X-Yami-no-Ko-X
Sanguina Cruenta
There's not a lot. There's the House of Net or whatever, but apparently that place is soooper creepy once you actually get into it and they're not recon after all, despite implying it. But if it looks like your thing, there's that.
There's not much otherwise. You have to dig deep for recon stuff other than lore.
Do you mean House of Net'jer?
Anywhere's a start. I've always liked the mythology and I've felt like Thoth and Bast have been calling. That's why I was hoping to find some decent sources on the recon.
Though another question: if I can't really find a whole lot on the religion is there a problem with trying to find my own why to worship the Kemetic pantheon?
There's only a few Kemetic religions I know of, anyway, which is pretty much just HoN, the Fellowship of Isis, Thelema, and reconstructionism. They're more modern than ancient in nature. The lore is there, but it's hard to apply to modern life a lot of the time, and some of it's really hard to apply outside the Nile valley of Egypt. Maintaining ritual purity seems to be the main theme that remains through most people's practices, and making sure that the Gods and ancestors are kept well, and are fed. But mileage may vary.
Most of the Kemetic pagans I know are HoN. HoN goes out of their way to blanket the internet with their presence, despite claiming to be non-proselytizing. They do make it look, if you're searching the internet, that they're the only game in town. I don't know whether that's intentional or not.
It is nominally a reconstructionist religion, but really...there's a lot less there than people think. It is, in the end, very much a modern neo-pagan organization. I can't give you a lot about Thelema, other than it's ceremonial magic and was Crowley's baby. The FOI is all over the damn place - a mishmash of ecclectic Goddess worship, that started in Ireland.
Frankly, like San, the House of Netjer bugs the hell outta me. I can't get around the fact that it's really a cult of personality built around their 'Nisut' - some of them are more into it than others, but there's no getting around the fact that if you practice that path, you end in acknowledging that a white woman from Illinois is the reincarnation of the Kingly Ka. That doesn't bother some people, and is the dealbreaker for others.
They also believe that all the gods of Egypt are one - Netjer - and that each individual god is just a facet. It's not really something that's got any historical evidence, and I feel like perhaps it's an attempt to explain why there are multiple deities of the same 'portfolio' - rather than looking at Egypt as a series of shifting centrality and dynasties, whose deities changed with the ruling families and their locations over thousands of years. I guess in some ways it makes it easier to deal with the issue of older vs. newer deities in the pantheon, but at the same time HoN's Kemeticism becomes a form of soft polytheism - which is not nescessarily how the ancients viewed the world and their gods. I guess it all depends on whether you're comfortable with them crossing the line from henotheism into monotheism.
A lot of people also go into HoN already possessing relationships with Kemetic deities. But when one becomes a Shemsu, and is Divined, basically you have to accept the divination of your 'Parent' and 'Beloved' Gods - the Gods who created your 'ba', and those who may care for you. If the divination disagrees with the Gods you feel have called you, you still have to accept it if you want to remain with HoN. I've been told by the shemsu I know that rarely does the divination contradict people's relationships, and that few people leave because of it...but I really don't know.
The faith does have a lower level, called Remetj - basically people who want to hang out without joining in full - but it means 'Royal Subjects'. Again, you may or may not be comfortable with having to acknowledge the Nisut.
There's nothing wrong with you making your own path to Kemet, if you do it respectfully and well. Reconstructionism is just that - a reconstruction. It doesn't (or shouldn't) make you an absolute slave to lore or history. If a practice has no context and makes no sense in modern life, it makes sense to change it enough to give it relevance, or to discard it entirely.
Reply
