Welcome to Gaia! ::

Pro Wrestling Guild

Back to Guilds

Lets talk about professional wrestling. 

Tags: Wrestling, World Wrestling Entertainment, Impact, NJPW, Ring of Honor 

Reply The Pro Wrestling Guild
no more Chyna in TNA...

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

grandkinglink

PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 2:27 pm


so word going around wrestlezone.com is saying that TNA told chyna if her porn movie came out they would not have her comeback..... lets think for a second your name is TNA.... which could be called tits and a**.... and a person doing porn is a bad thing???? i mean i won't watch it but someone will and who knows maybe if she ...never mind im not justifiying this lol
PostPosted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 7:11 pm


TNA wants to do everything WWE does, and WWE's gone PG. This doesn't surprise me.

The Millenium Walken

Eloquent Humorist

11,675 Points
  • Mark Twain 100
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Tycoon 200

black_wing_angel

Blessed Rogue

10,775 Points
  • Megathread 100
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Mega Tipsy 100
PostPosted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 3:07 am


And this is coming from the same company that prides itself on being "edgy" (don't make me laugh), and adult-oriented?

Oh the ******** irony...
PostPosted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 4:33 am


They've got female characters that dry hump the ring ropes. WTF.

Archon of Aegis

Elder


BoloBoffin

5,000 Points
  • Junior Trader 100
  • Wall Street 200
  • Voter 100
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:56 pm


I'm sorry but I'm on TNA's side on this one.
I'm reminded of that line from Pulp Fiction "Do you see a sign on the front of my house that says dead ****** storage?" because at the end of the day porn isn't the business TNA is in. I know WWE does movies and has had divas in Playboy. Here's the difference though. WWE made deals with playboy and made there own studio. So with each playboy issues sold and each movie WWE got some kind of revenue. So she goes to do a porn on her own A) TNA gains nothing (financially) for it and B) Can loss a noticeable chunk of there viewers because of over protective parents.

Here's some food for thought, in the 60's (because of over protective parents) hearings over the "evils" of Rock music were held. Is it really a stretch to believe that people are going to stop watching and stop there kids from watching just because one of the knockouts did a porn. I don't blame TNA for this ruling one bit.
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:29 pm


At the end of the day, Chyna's proven that she'll basically do anything for money. Isn't that the kind of wrestler that any federation wants under contract?

The Millenium Walken

Eloquent Humorist

11,675 Points
  • Mark Twain 100
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Tycoon 200

Archon of Aegis

Elder

PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 3:50 pm


BoloBoffin
I'm sorry but I'm on TNA's side on this one.
I'm reminded of that line from Pulp Fiction "Do you see a sign on the front of my house that says dead ****** storage?" because at the end of the day porn isn't the business TNA is in. I know WWE does movies and has had divas in Playboy. Here's the difference though. WWE made deals with playboy and made there own studio. So with each playboy issues sold and each movie WWE got some kind of revenue. So she goes to do a porn on her own A) TNA gains nothing (financially) for it and B) Can loss a noticeable chunk of there viewers because of over protective parents.

Here's some food for thought, in the 60's (because of over protective parents) hearings over the "evils" of Rock music were held. Is it really a stretch to believe that people are going to stop watching and stop there kids from watching just because one of the knockouts did a porn. I don't blame TNA for this ruling one bit.
Clearly you aren't watching TNA cause edgy sexual content is what they've been all about alot of the time. They've advertised themselves as the mature audiences promotion since WWE doesn't do any of the things you put forward and hasn't for years.

You are correct though that they still do movies, but look at the new crop of movies they've put out, comedies and inspirational dramas. This is the same company that years ago brought you action and horror films until they switches modes to family friendly.
PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 11:52 pm


Archon of Aegis
BoloBoffin
I'm sorry but I'm on TNA's side on this one.
I'm reminded of that line from Pulp Fiction "Do you see a sign on the front of my house that says dead ****** storage?" because at the end of the day porn isn't the business TNA is in. I know WWE does movies and has had divas in Playboy. Here's the difference though. WWE made deals with playboy and made there own studio. So with each playboy issues sold and each movie WWE got some kind of revenue. So she goes to do a porn on her own A) TNA gains nothing (financially) for it and B) Can loss a noticeable chunk of there viewers because of over protective parents.

Here's some food for thought, in the 60's (because of over protective parents) hearings over the "evils" of Rock music were held. Is it really a stretch to believe that people are going to stop watching and stop there kids from watching just because one of the knockouts did a porn. I don't blame TNA for this ruling one bit.
Clearly you aren't watching TNA cause edgy sexual content is what they've been all about alot of the time. They've advertised themselves as the mature audiences promotion since WWE doesn't do any of the things you put forward and hasn't for years.

You are correct though that they still do movies, but look at the new crop of movies they've put out, comedies and inspirational dramas. This is the same company that years ago brought you action and horror films until they switches modes to family friendly.


Clearly you missed the point of what I was saying. The bottom line here is about 2 thing for TNA business and covering there own a**. As I said before they gain no money from this. Also just because they are aiming for a mature demographic doesn't stop stupid people from complaining. I mean to use my previous comparison guns and roses and Metallica aren't exactly aimed at kids either but that didn't stop parents from complaining about them.

Side note: I'm assuming your talking about the Marine and See No Evil. Both those movies were made after WWE went family friendly. In fact I was there at Raw in Anaheim, when WWE premiered See No Evil for the audience after the taping of Raw. The family friendly thing was well under way then and that was some years ago.

BoloBoffin

5,000 Points
  • Junior Trader 100
  • Wall Street 200
  • Voter 100
Reply
The Pro Wrestling Guild

 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum