BoloBoffin
I'm sorry but I'm on TNA's side on this one.
I'm reminded of that line from
Pulp Fiction "Do you see a sign on the front of my house that says dead ****** storage?" because at the end of the day porn isn't the business TNA is in. I know WWE does movies and has had divas in Playboy. Here's the difference though. WWE made deals with playboy and made there own studio. So with each playboy issues sold and each movie WWE got some kind of revenue. So she goes to do a porn on her own A) TNA gains nothing (financially) for it and B) Can loss a noticeable chunk of there viewers because of over protective parents.
Here's some food for thought, in the 60's (because of over protective parents) hearings over the "evils" of Rock music were held. Is it really a stretch to believe that people are going to stop watching and stop there kids from watching just because one of the knockouts did a porn. I don't blame TNA for this ruling one bit.
Clearly you aren't watching TNA cause edgy sexual content is what they've been all about alot of the time. They've advertised themselves as the mature audiences promotion since WWE doesn't do any of the things you put forward and hasn't for years.
You are correct though that they still do movies, but look at the new crop of movies they've put out, comedies and inspirational dramas. This is the same company that years ago brought you action and horror films until they switches modes to family friendly.