|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:30 am
Who here has seen Underworld 1 or 2
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 5:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 4:31 pm
I've seen them both. THEY ROCK.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 7:49 am
i've seen the first and the werewolves looked so cool!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 5:52 pm
I wish they had more furr....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 12:38 pm
I've seen both the movies, and i hate them both.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 12:41 pm
They angered me when they showed the vampires all cheerful, and they made the werewolves savage, but it should be the other way around neutral smile I know werewolves aren't savage, because i spent time studying shamanism and i found out that the wolf is my spiritual brother.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 9:55 am
I saw them bot hand loved them! Mostly due to Selene and Michael's sexyness... 3nodding
But the werewolves were structures nicely, just portrayed a bit off. Fighting and guns and all that... who needs guns?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:06 pm
Seen Both, loved 'em. Oh, Hi by the way!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:13 pm
Seen both, liked them for the most part, but I think the fight with William in the second one could have used a little more work. I think they kinda made the werewolf race look a little more wimpy having William getting beaten so easily...but that's my opinion! 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Angelic Werewolfgrl Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 8:24 pm
One question about #2: what the hell was up with Marcus? He's a vampire lord-guy and all totally badass, then they say he's a hybrid like Micheal. WTF? what is he?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 7:10 am
I totally don't know 'cuz he didn't look like micheal. My theory is that because he was vampire first unlike micheal who was a werewolf first and then bitten by a vampire. That could have made the affect different on him. OH AND BY THE WAY!!! EVERYONE SHOULD CHECK OUT THE QUEST IDEAS TOPIC!! YOU'LL BE SURPRISED!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Angelic Werewolfgrl Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hudine Wolfspirit Captain
|
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:57 pm
I seen the first one ages ago, just seen the second today. Loved them both.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 12:13 am
I have seen both, and I have answers for your questions reguarding them. Marcus was the first vampire. His bloodline spawned all the others, and to kill him would kill all those he sired, thus destroying all vampires. Michael, on the other hand, is a hybrid of both species. Effectivly, he is the first of his own race, one with the strengths of both races, and the weaknesses of none. William was portraied poorly, in my opinion, as his character looked like nothing more then a man wearing an over-sized wolf mask. Considering the budget for the movie and the level of detail given to almost every other aspect, you would have expected them to have given William more realism.... But again, that is only my view on these movies, and overall I enjoyed them a great deal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hudine Wolfspirit Captain
|
Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 1:35 am
I agree on you about William. But it's the plot I enjoyed the most.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
