|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 10:15 pm
So how do you guys feel about the Rumble having 40 participants instead of the traditional 30?
Will this make the rumble too long? Will it be filled with bland jobbers? Can any good come from having 10 more wrestlers? Will Vince stick with 40 from now on, or is this a one time deal?
Discuss!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 1:11 pm
I think it's overkill, it is going to be overly long and really all they're probably going to do is have more guest star and jobbers. 30 is plenty and I hope this is just a one time experiment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thorax_The_Impaler Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 1:20 pm
I agree with Thorax, I don't see any significances of having 10 more wrestlers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 6:20 pm
10 more sexy men in spandex tights dabess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thorax_The_Impaler Captain
|
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:17 pm
Generation Prince 10 more sexy men in spandex tights dabess. Um...... eek eek eek eek eek eek eek What?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thorax_The_Impaler Captain
|
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:07 pm
Then either your hiding something from us or you've been hacked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2011 4:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
