rmcdra
Samuels Fourth Call
I usually see it as a cop out term to justify an argument or a theological reasoning you hold, whenever someone states that something makes no sense, or is illogical, or cruel or against perceived aspects of God, people smack back with "You are using man's reasoning" which is nothing but the ultimate get out clause of "God is right, so there"
By simply stating something is correct because you attribute it to God is falicous and a horrific example of special pleading.
Exactly. Maybe you might be able to provide some insight but why do you think this cop-out is accepted? I'm completely at a lost on this.
It's accepted mostly out of fear or inabbility to logical disprove it.
By Definition we give God (Usually loosely defined) attributes such Omniscience and Omnipotence, which define him as All Knowing and All powerful, along with these comes the fact that he would know the best possible outcome , reason and course of action for every perciable event or thought.
This put's us obviously at a mental disadvantage, because however smart we may be , God is smarter, however perplexing or logically unfeesable a concept may be, God can understand it.
So when we dont understand something or "God Forbid"
disagreewith something, well...bless our little socks, it's allright you just dont understand God, because your only thinking "With Man's reasoning" which is inferior in every way.
Who are we to question the innefable YHVH?
Reply
