So, this is a question I like to bring up every now and again with different people, the question of what makes a "good book" good and a "bad book" bad?
Is it the author's narrative style?
Is it the subject they're writing about?
Is it the relative complexity or simplicity of their subject?
Is it their grammar and/or word usage?
Their character development?
How many sub-plots they incorporate?
How "original" the work is?
How "deep" the work is?
Or, is it simply whether or not the reader enjoys the work that makes it a "good book"?
What is your take on the matter?
Is it the author's narrative style?
Is it the subject they're writing about?
Is it the relative complexity or simplicity of their subject?
Is it their grammar and/or word usage?
Their character development?
How many sub-plots they incorporate?
How "original" the work is?
How "deep" the work is?
Or, is it simply whether or not the reader enjoys the work that makes it a "good book"?
What is your take on the matter?
... could kick your a** !!
