Welcome to Gaia! ::

United Manokan Naval Command

Back to Guilds

The Manokan Military, where we ceaselessly seek to defend our country. 

Tags: Army, Infantry, Combat, Industry, Battle 

Reply - Archive
Basics of Warfare

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Suicidesoldier#1
Captain

Fanatical Zealot

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 11:46 am


BASICS OF WARFARE

(Sun Tzu Art of War)




Warfare is a state of being in which an established behavior pattern is in a certain state of organized, violent conflict that is typically engaged in between two or more separate social entities. According to Sun Tzu, " The art of war is of vital importance to the State. It is a matter of life and death, a road either to safety or to ruin. Hence it is a subject of inquiry which can on no account be neglected." Sun Tzu, of course, quite literally wrote the book on the "Art of War"; which in that sense, war is truly an art, and truthfully not an exact science despite the extensive research, testing, and technology typically used and exploited in it's execution.

In the modern era, world wars and countless other major conflicts have changed the employment of the militaries beyond recognition to their ancient participants. Empires have come and gone; states have grown and declined. Enormous social changes have been wrought, and military power continues to dominate international relations. The role of the military today is as central to global societies as it ever was.

The manners and execution of such wars have drastically changed over the centuries; but their central theme and importance have not. Quite literally, any state that has not engaged in active warfare or defense in some form or another has either been destroyed, assimilated, or continuously protected by and external force, of which it is usually directly associated with. The reason for the global and wide-spread exploitation of warfare is primarily due to it's destructive nature; as such, most nations or states which haven't conducted in some aspect or another of warfare or armed defense have most likely been destroyed or already eliminated by the destructive aspects of war, meaning that most the remaining states, as a result of war, must have been war driven at some point in order to survive in modern day existence.

A a very good book to read in understanding, re-approaching, or generalizing basic aspects of the "Art of War", is of course, the Art of War by Sun Tzu. It teaches the basic concepts of the Art of War, and many lessons explained can still be applied today- mostly due to it's theoretical approach at situations, rather than blatant statements. For instance, when Sun Tzu talks of different kinds of Terrain, he doesn't merely speak of different environments, as environments can change and have continued to change historically; rather he talks of types of terrain, based on certain effects of the terrain, rather than the terrain itself. In this manner, and through broad generalization, Sun Tzu's "Art of War" serves as a very effective guide for the Art of War, in all aspects occupying all types of terrain and different kind of scenarios. The "Art of War" is so effective at being an applied system, rather than a simple guide to conventional warfare, that businesses, sports professionals, and people in many different kinds of competitive scenarios have learned to adapt the philosophies and ideas of the Art of War to their specific scenarios; even when their form of "warfare" is entirely abstract in nature. Sun Tzu's concepts, theories, and philosophies are based more so on objective qualities rather than subjective qualities, and adhere to certain fundamental truths that describe events that occur in a particular manner rather than the events themselves.

In addition, to those of which who seek odd forms of "Leadership", wish to have an objective viewpoint in terms of the abstract concept of power, or whom merely want to explore and read more material centered around concepts of war, the Prince by Niccolò Machiavelli is another good read. While not necessarily entirely about war, the read has more to do with power and the ways to maintain power (at the time, in warring states) and helps to emphasize events in leadership and "power". What is unique about the Prince is it's strict obedience to objective criteria rather than subjective criteria, and seeks to constantly achieve a goal based on reliable, in some cases somewhat consistently true information, and very truthfully "Machiavellin" approach; that is an approach to situations that disregards all other variables other than that of which will achieve the projected goal, sometimes the means to the end directly inflicting what would normally be considered "Great Evil" upon people. While not necessarily the most important read or something that should form the base criteria or philosophy of a leader, it does provide several key insights in leading and in terms of of exploiting, executing and maintaining power, serving as an objective set of criteria for leadership and power in general.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 4:51 am


Things to Consider




There are many things to consider when planning and engaging in warfare. Of course, Sun Tzu is a great read for understanding these things. In accordance with this guild, and for self creation purposes, that is something that is purely unique to this guild, I have devised a rather simple system intent on making decision making and planning a relatively easy and systematic thing to do. While not necessarily the most detailed, instructive, or truthfully full-filling guide, it hopefully will be something unique to the Manokan Guild.





MOST



Mission

Objective

Strategy

Tactics




MOST, or M, O, S, T, is an acronym for Mission, Objective, Strategy, and Tactics. Remember to always try to make the Most, of your situation. M is of course, for mission. The mission, and the objective, or the Mission Objective are one in the same; the objective, directly following mission, is a direct follow up and sub-unit of the mission itself. While a mission and objective are directly related, the Objective quite literally being a "Mission Objective", or MO, the Objective is such an important and integral part to any mission that it is considered important enough to be a separate entity. As it follows Mission, or M, it is a direct sub-unit of it, and Mo is standard for the Same concept of the objective and mission objective itself. The difference between a mission and an objective is such that a mission defines, lists, and exacerbates all important, relevant, and even random information associated with a mission, where as the objective is the primary goal. Were as a mission is in all actuality technically an objective, the Objective, or Mission Objective, specifically clarifies the objective of the mission in a short, concise and otherwise packed and loaded few statements, as a quick and constant reminder of what the unit's duty actually is.


S is for Strategy, and T is for Tactics, with Tactics being a direct sub-unit of Strategy, forming the Acronym "ST". Tactics, in that Regard, are in reality "Strategical Tactics", that is a Tactic is part of a Strategy. While a Strategy and Tactics are directly related, Tactics are considered important and integral enough to be considered their own separate entity, and thus form the "T" in MS (Mission Strategy), or MoSt, as objective forms the "O". The difference between Strategy and between Tactics is that a Strategy ideally encompasses a plan for an entire Mission Parameter, were as a tactic is a unit in achieving the said strategy. While different tactics can influence a strategy, and vice versa, they are slightly different in application and in use. Were as a strategy is solely a plan of action, a tactic may be a specific kind of weapon or skill used in the execution of such a strategy. For instance, using machine guns rather than machetes can be a tactical advantage, were as a strategic advantage may be troop size (say, 6,000 versus 300). A good example of the difference between something strategically important and something tactically important would instead be something like a suicide mission. Strategically, a suicide mission drains a military of soldiers, units, and resources, infringing on the wide-spread campaign of a military, were as tactically suicide missions often have a very high rate of success, and many particular activities can be achieved effectively by a unit "Giving themselves up"; such as in a suicide bombing, in were as person rushes an enemy so fast they are incapable of responding, and shooting the suicide bomber has little to no effect as their bomb explodes anyways and can potentially remove a wide range of enemies. An example of this kind of activity could be noted in WWII, in which Kamikaze war planes would dive bomb into enemy ships, promoting significant amounts of pinpoint damage very effectively in a short time period, but effectively reducing the number of well trained and very brave pilots in the war. As well, by not preserving their own pilots, they eventually wore out their out Navy and Airforce reserve, effectively depleting themselves of many useful soldiers. Another example of this is of course in the middle east, in which suicide bombers constantly barrage enemy strongholds in self destructive manners; being very hard to combat, but after a 3-4 war campaign, the effective number of units dropping by nearly 250%. While Strategies and Tactics are directly related, due to their slight differentiations which can change the course of battle, both are considered equally important, and form the "ST" part of "MOST".





Basic Definition




Mission- The mission is the total description of all the parameters present in a specific scenario or series of events, and the objective of the primary Manokan Forces, or your objective in general or specifically. The Mission is basically the entire event taken up, summarized, and given in direct context. Basic Intel, information from reconnaissance, and extraneous forms of information will be considered, weighed, and given to you for assessment and understanding, and is part of a mission. The mission of course, includes all the various details of the event and any relevant, despite how irrelevant, information present; and usually more. A mission only exists as a result of an objective, and vice versa, and typically a Mission Objective and a Mission go hand in hand.

Objective- This is usually a quick, concise, and charged Mission Objective or "MO", or in other words, a "Mission Statement". While not necessarily a Mission Statement in the way it is used colloquially and usually, the central aspects of the Mission Objective are simply a Mission Statement. Whether concise or not, the Mission Objective is the series of actions needed to be preformed by the unit receiving the Mission, and more or less serves as a finite goal by the end of the Mission; I.E. disable the Reactor, Eliminate all enemy troops, or Gather Intel. Why not necessarily detailed, an Objective specifically outlines the goals wished to be achieved by the end of a mission, or as an end result- in other words it serves as a guide for all the actions preformed by a unit, and all the strategies developed. Conversely, if things haywire or not according to plan, the mission objective keeps the duties of such units in the correct perspective.

Strategy- Strategy, a word of military origin, refers to a plan of action designed to achieve a particular goal. In military usage strategy is distinct from tactics, which are concerned with the conduct of an engagement, while strategy is concerned with how different engagements are linked. How a battle is fought is a matter of tactics: the terms and conditions that it is fought on and whether it should be fought at all is a matter of strategy, which is part of the four levels of warfare: political goals or grand strategy, strategy, operations, and tactics. A strategy also involves a full fledged goal or action in which an entire party will be clinging to, were as tactics are usually the execution or ways in execution of said strategy.

Tactics- Military tactics, the art of organizing an army, are the techniques for using weapons or military units in combination for engaging and defeating an enemy in battle. Changes in philosophy and technology over time have been reflected in changes to military tactics. They basically involve the plans for the actual execution of said strategy- such as using a nuclear bomb or giving a specific area to target. Tactics also involve smaller movements, such as a Squad engaging in Guerrilla warfare of shock tactics or preforming specific maneuvers. An example of a used tactic would be "Blitzkrieg", or lightning war, a tactic in which Hitler used to try to use sudden, "Shock Force" to surprise and overwhelm the enemy before they could mount a defense. The strategy of course, was to use this tactic to take several key strong holds of the enemy and capture ports, political centers, and cities in order to force their enemies into some form of stand still and to gather new territory and "workers". The difference between a strategy and a tactic is very thin, however, given the importance of both, both are included in the MOST acronym.

Suicidesoldier#1
Captain

Fanatical Zealot


Suicidesoldier#1
Captain

Fanatical Zealot

PostPosted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 9:09 pm


Specific Tactics


T.A.C.T.I.C.S.




No, there isn't an acronym for tactics, but I really tried. Instead, I developed the five T's! Which, Tactic starts with a T, and has another t, so it should be fairly easily to remember. Also, as there are a lot of useful military words that start with a T pertaining to Tactics, which were I got lost and began to be unable to form an acronym. So instead I give you this! The Five T's of Tactics!

These are, in effect, things to keep in mind while creating tactics, not tactical advantages of their own, per say. While integral to tactics, they are not complete, not are they guides to tactics. They are merely things to keep in mind when considering tactics, what tactical maneuvers to use, and when developing strategies.




Terrain- (As in the Sun Tzu Art of War)

Technology

Training

Timing

Troops- (As in the Sun Tzu Art of War)
Reply
- Archive

 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum