|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 9:13 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 11:06 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 11:29 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 1:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 7:15 pm
Fender.. even thou they both suck sweatdrop
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 11:59 pm
and they say there is no such thing as a stupid question...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 11:39 am
Fender doesn't suck. Neither does Yamaha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 12:12 pm
I'd be semi-inclined to go with Yamaha.
Only because of some of the very talented players that have made their whole empire on mostly a Yamaha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 12:41 pm
Yamaha has some spectacular mid-to-high range stuff. Their set neck LP-style guitars are fantastic. And there's not much argument that the midrange (lowest range for Fender) guitars from Fender (standards) leave something to be desired, but the American series still retains the Fender quality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 1:02 pm
hmmmmmm
If semi-hollowbody or hollowbody then yamaha but if regular guitar then fender. I hate both but their are some certain guitars they have that I love alot. But anyway my first sentence is what you should be focusing on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 6:29 pm
Fender, if it weren't for them there probably wouldn't be a Yamaha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 7:14 pm
Sorry, but can't you make any other intelligible topics than one's that involve picking between two choices?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 10:34 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
