|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 2:52 pm
What do you guys think then?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 2:53 pm
my brain almost imploded near the end.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 3:45 pm
The Angels moved! I disliked that part. I thought they were only stone when looked at, which meant that they couldn't be killed but as a drawback they also couldn't move. So when she had her eyes closed, why were they stone, and why could they move?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 3:53 pm
I cant tell what you're upset about from your post. Is it because they were still stone when Amy had her eyes closed; because they were stone while they were moving; just because they were moving; or some other reason entirely?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 6:37 pm
HAHAHAHAA I loved Amy was coming on to him XD
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 7:06 pm
Ambril Tyler Smith HAHAHAHAA I loved Amy was coming on to him XD *shhhhvvvvvwp* yeah. you hear that sound? that would be my brain imploding.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 8:55 pm
I liked, at the end, actually seeing the Angels move. Before we only saw it in sort of a strobe effect, kind of jerky. But to see them actually moving and turning their heads was cool [and creepy]
SO, so curious to find out more about River Song, what she did, who she killed [and why?]
Now, I can totally understand Amy getting all "up" on the Doctor, being a Lord of Time is wicked sexy...but that seemed SO out of character. Like she suddenly had a concussion that made her horny. Makes me want to know more about what's going on in her head [split personality?], and in that crack.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 1:48 am
SaphiraStar I cant tell what you're upset about from your post. Is it because they were still stone when Amy had her eyes closed; because they were stone while they were moving; just because they were moving; or some other reason entirely? All three. It seems to completely contradict what was said in "Blink".
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 2:20 am
I enjoyed it alot, its my fav epd of this season. The ending had me in fits of giggles. I think it was kinda obvious that she wanted to jump his bones from the start to me. He was all befuddled and cute.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 2:23 am
knightofthe21stcentury SaphiraStar I cant tell what you're upset about from your post. Is it because they were still stone when Amy had her eyes closed; because they were stone while they were moving; just because they were moving; or some other reason entirely? All three. It seems to completely contradict what was said in "Blink". I thought it was because the angels were so busy worrying about the crack, that thought she could see and thus turn into stone in defense. But when they realized she had her eyes closed they could move, hence why we saw them move.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 3:02 am
It's supposed to be built into their DNA isn't it? so they can only stop if looked at because it is built into their DNA. It's not a mental effect that makes them believe they have to stop, weather they believed she was looking at them or not, they would still be able to move and then know she wasn't looking at them. You know, like when Sally and her bf kept them on the spot and looked deep into their eyes and did not get effected at all.
Besides, I would be more worried with how the doctor had his coat stolen but when he bends down to tell Amy that she needs to remember, he is wearing it again but then seems to have lost it again, 1 scene later.
I would be worried about many other things harder to get my head round than just a few angels who couldn't move.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 7:27 am
I noticed that. And We complained about RTD's plot holes. That one just takes the cake. XD
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 10:04 am
That's the thing, isn't it? RTD's could easily be explained away but you can't do that with a SM episode. I remember all the people saying "I can't wait till SM comes along and fixes everything" and I find myself loling in a very guilty way.
I guess he did fix everything though (If anything was wrong), because he un-wrote the stolen earth history so who knows what else is gone and now never existed. Journeys End is a bit of a problem because if it didn't exist, what happened to Donna and the Meta 10th? I am hoping just because an event didn't exist it doesn't mean it never happened because if that is true, Donna wouldn't have lost her memory, Rose would still be alone and many other things could now be gone. Rose may still be in that same old flat, or living with Mickey and if that is true, it's the worst plot hole in DW history. The Dr could be immune to these changes because the Tardis protects him but you can't explain why Donna wouldn't still be with him if the event never happened because she isn't protected and can't help but still be in the Tardis. The crack could easily re-write the Dr's history, too from what he hints at when he was going to give himself up so it seems like Wilf would never have killed the 10th and if so........ you get the idea. The only way we're gonna know if the event never happened is if something comes back that should be gone thus pointing out it never happened. And like I say, if the event's didn't happen then we are left with the problems above. And even if it does get fixed later on and the crack gets filled in, (if) things never happened it still wouldn't explain why a few things would not have existed, like Daleks stealing earth and Donna not being with him and no one rememebring this stuff, (Time flows back around and shows effects) Example of just 1 thing: if it does get fixed then Amy would have knows about the Daleks. If fixed, things in this series would never have happened thus causing more problems. *Some episodes I have of future shows have missing scenes so I can't say for sure how this gets fixed and if it fixes plot holes* I would seriously be a lot more worried with that then a few Angels, though.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 12:52 pm
God, what a shambles.
Moffat's fallen even more in love with his creations than Russel ever did with the Slitheen.
So River's going to come back and kill the doctor and somehow that means he's going to love her forever and ever because of it.
Unless he decides to love Amy, or something equally banal.
I honestly couldn't care less at this point how it all works out. The whole episode was tedious in the extreme and some of the dialogue was appalling.
New Who has yet to excite me amidst all the gaudy CGI flimflammery and uber-pseudo-science. If there was a story somewhere in Flesh and Stone that's likely what you'll find it buried under.
Disappointing :/
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 2:35 pm
I am pointing out 2 main problems.
1st. How the hell did those angels move while looking at eachother? in blink this made them stand still forever. so theyre saying blink was wrong?
2nd .They say that even those broken angels can use the image trick so the ones from blink should have too because they where obviously stronger than broken angels. i stoppd watching half way through it was just s**t.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|