|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2010 7:51 am
How has this already made it's way past the H.R. ? -_-
Source: http://foodfreedom.wordpress.com/2010/04/24/s-510-is-hissing-in-the-grass/#more-1828
“If accepted [S 510] would preclude the public’s right to grow, own, trade, transport, share, feed and eat each and every food that nature makes. It will become the most offensive authority against the cultivation, trade and consumption of food and agricultural products of one’s choice. It will be unconstitutional and contrary to natural law or, if you like, the will of God.” ~Dr. Shiv Chopra, Canada Health whistleblower
It is similar to what India faced with imposition of the salt tax during British rule, only S 510 extends control over all food in the US, violating the fundamental human right to food.
Monsanto says it has no interest in the bill and would not benefit from it, but Monsanto’s Michael Taylor who gave us rBGH and unregulated genetically modified (GM) organisms, appears to have designed it and is waiting as an appointed Food Czar to the FDA (a position unapproved by Congress) to administer the agency it would create — without judicial review — if it passes. S 510 would give Monsanto unlimited power over all US seed, food supplements, food and farming. History
In the 1990s, Bill Clinton introduced HACCP (Hazardous Analysis Critical Control Points) purportedly to deal with contamination in the meat industry. Clinton’s HACCP delighted the offending corporate (World Trade Organization “WTO”) meat packers since it allowed them to inspect themselves, eliminated thousands of local food processors (with no history of contamination), and centralized meat into their control. Monsanto promoted HACCP.
In 2008, Hillary Clinton, urged a powerful centralized food safety agency as part of her campaign for president. Her advisor was Mark Penn, CEO of Burson Marsteller*, a giant PR firm representing Monsanto. Clinton lost, but Clinton friends such as Rosa DeLauro, whose husband’s firm lists Monsanto as a progressive client and globalization as an area of expertise, introduced early versions of S 510. S 510 fails on moral, social, economic, political, constitutional, and human survival grounds.
1. It puts all US food and all US farms under Homeland Security and the Department of Defense, in the event of contamination or an ill-defined emergency. It resembles the Kissinger Plan.
2. It would end US sovereignty over its own food supply by insisting on compliance with the WTO, thus threatening national security. It would end the Uruguay Round Agreement Act of 1994, which put US sovereignty and US law under perfect protection. Instead, S 510 says:
COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS.
Nothing in this Act (or an amendment made by this Act) shall be construed in a manner inconsistent with the agreement establishing the World Trade Organization or any other treaty or international agreement to which the United States is a party.
3. It would allow the government, under Maritime Law, to define the introduction of any food into commerce (even direct sales between individuals) as smuggling into “the United States.” Since under that law, the US is a corporate entity and not a location, “entry of food into the US” covers food produced anywhere within the land mass of this country and “entering into” it by virtue of being produced.
4. It imposes Codex Alimentarius on the US, a global system of control over food. It allows the United Nations (UN), World Health Organization (WHO), UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and the WTO to take control of every food on earth and remove access to natural food supplements. Its bizarre history and its expected impact in limiting access to adequate nutrition (while mandating GM food, GM animals, pesticides, hormones, irradiation of food, etc.) threatens all safe and organic food and health itself, since the world knows now it needs vitamins to survive, not just to treat illnesses.
5. It would remove the right to clean, store and thus own seed in the US, putting control of seeds in the hands of Monsanto and other multinationals, threatening US security. See Seeds – How to criminalize them, for more details.
6. It includes NAIS, an animal traceability program that threatens all small farmers and ranchers raising animals. The UN is participating through the WHO, FAO, WTO, and World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) in allowing mass slaughter of even heritage breeds of animals and without proof of disease. Biodiversity in farm animals is being wiped out to substitute genetically engineered animals on which corporations hold patents. Animal diseases can be falsely declared. S 510 includes the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), despite its corrupt involvement in the H1N1 scandal, which is now said to have been concocted by the corporations.
7. It extends a failed and destructive HACCP to all food, thus threatening to do to all local food production and farming what HACCP did to meat production – put it in corporate hands and worsen food safety.
8. It deconstructs what is left of the American economy. It takes agriculture and food, which are the cornerstone of all economies, out of the hands of the citizenry, and puts them under the total control of multinational corporations influencing the UN, WHO, FAO and WTO, with HHS, and CDC, acting as agents, with Homeland Security as the enforcer. The chance to rebuild the economy based on farming, ranching, gardens, food production, natural health, and all the jobs, tools and connected occupations would be eliminated.
9. It would allow the government to mandate antibiotics, hormones, slaughterhouse waste, pesticides and GMOs. This would industrialize every farm in the US, eliminate local organic farming, greatly increase global warming from increased use of oil-based products and long-distance delivery of foods, and make food even more unsafe. The five items listed — the Five Pillars of Food Safety — are precisely the items in the food supply which are the primary source of its danger.
10. It uses food crimes as the entry into police state power and control. The bill postpones defining all the regulations to be imposed; postpones defining crimes to be punished, postpones defining penalties to be applied. It removes fundamental constitutional protections from all citizens in the country, making them subject to a corporate tribunal with unlimited power and penalties, and without judicial review. It is (similar to C-6 in Canada) the end of Rule of Law in the US.
For further information, watch these videos:
Food Laws – Forcing people to globalize http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ia-P4rL2IWc
State Imposed Violence … to snatch resources of ordinary people http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onw_PkVvpts&feature=related
Corporate Rule http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PwqUQ_HIlg&feature=related
Reclaiming Economies http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXoJHG-er7A&feature=related
Oak snake image at Alfred B. Maclay Gardens State Park, Florida http://snipurl.com/vrg6p
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2010 2:03 pm
I heard about this and Codex Alimentarius from some youtubers a few months ago, but I didn't know it had come this far! This is beyond ******** up. It's surreal. People need to wake the ******** up NOW. Regardless if the average American thinks it's too insane to be passed, "they" REALLY want to pass these laws. If we don't ALL stand up and voice our opinions against it, it could actually happen! Don't just think "oh someone else is going to stop it" cuz if you all think like that, then there wont be enough voices to stop it! This is scary s**t guys, real scary...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:51 pm
neutral I just want out of this country. sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 2:59 pm
FDA Says You Have No Right to Real Food Unless They Give You Permission First http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/05/29/fda-says-you-have-no-right-to-real-food-unless-they-give-you-permission-first.aspx
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:50 am
Codex Serves Up A Hearty Helping of Melamine! http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/06/10/codex-serves-up-a-hearty-helping-of-melamine.aspx
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:32 pm
It Section 101 it claims to exclude farms and restaurants?
=|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:08 pm
This will pass just like ACTA will pass. Even if people cared we have next to no control of the legislative process.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 11:36 pm
oh please if we dont try will will auto fail, we must try somthing new
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 7:28 pm
Hoshioni oh please if we dont try will will auto fail, we must try somthing new What do you propose be done? We protest in the streets and get bombed with teargas? Everyone knows protests don't really do s**t.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 2:24 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:29 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 11:46 am
it hasn't passed yet.... not from what I understand.
On November 17th "by a vote of 74 to 25 the U.S. Senate voted for cloture on S 510, the Food Safety Modernization Act, which means it must now be voted on in the full Senate within 60 days. All amendments to the controversial food control bill must be completed by that time."
..... 'food control bill' - no one should control food
I believe there is still time for those in the States to speak out against it. Even if just to gain more time in sharing with others so they may have a chance to read up on it before their RIGHTS are taken away.
(I'll post more on this later too)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 10:15 pm
ammaea it hasn't passed yet.... not from what I understand. On November 17th "by a vote of 74 to 25 the U.S. Senate voted for cloture on S 510, the Food Safety Modernization Act, which means it must now be voted on in the full Senate within 60 days. All amendments to the controversial food control bill must be completed by that time." ..... 'food control bill' - no one should control food I believe there is still time for those in the States to speak out against it. Even if just to gain more time in sharing with others so they may have a chance to read up on it before their RIGHTS are taken away. (I'll post more on this later too) Someone should be able to keep an eye on the food supply. All of the recent salmonella outbreaks are one reason. Imagine you or your family get seriously ill because of contaminated food and the government's only response is "We don't have anyone that handles that, sorry." That's why the FDA was established in the first place. You can't just let anyone sell anything they want.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 11:25 pm
I'm definitely not saying there shouldn't be standard practices to keep contamination down... Just sayin that most of the issues are caused by the FDA slacking off on routine checks and (almost it seems Allowing it to happen, not minimizing outbreaks by re-calling soon enough, ), and that the LEAST amount of issues are with smaller farms - especially organic dairy and meats...
'all the recent salmonella outbreaks' how many have there even been? how many people have died from it?
how many people are going to die in the next generation or two from an ever-increasing disease and immune deficiencies if all we are ALLOWED to buy and eat are foods tainted with chemicals and toxins and lack nutritional value...
The FDA may have been established to 'keep us safe' but it's doing a damn lousy job..
and the government should be stepping in.
oh but wait - they're in for the money too.
and being healthy doesn't rake in the money~
fact: bacteria is everywhere... running small farms out of business isn't gonna change that another fact: you body is made to deal with it when given the right fuel another fact (using the raw milk being banned thing): harmful bacteria has been found more in pasteurized milk causing more issues. AND pasteurizing it kills all the GOOD bacteria that HELP your immune system.
I've read many reports that speak of the FDA/whoever letting the egg scandal go on.. or about meat that wasn't good but they knew of it.... false flags.. etc.. getting the public to think it's a huge issue without giving them all the facts first.
The next step after pwning all the farms is to add a clause to the bill stating that also to keep our food safe that it must all be irradiated (already in the works!). It's disgusting.
please read more on the issue.
that's all I ask for really. stop the bill so that more people can hear about it first. rather than keeping it form the general public and passing it without anyone seeing.
No one will even know it happened....
k i'm done now. O_O;;
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|