Welcome to Gaia! ::

RoseSoul Tribe

Back to Guilds

this guild will be a community of RPing, Debate/Discussion, Art/Litterature, Contests and Fellowship. 

Tags: roleplaying, fantasy, contests, music, occult 

Reply Discussion & Debate District
Twi's Theory of Evolution Goto Page: 1 2 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Chieftain Twilight
Captain

Loyal Rogue

14,550 Points
  • Full closet 200
  • Tested Practitioner 250
  • Elocutionist 200
PostPosted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 4:07 am


i noticed that the topic of Evolution vs. Creationism came up in the Mandatory Thread on my way to posting something more personal to discuss, and felt invited to share this Theory of mine that i love to talk about about! ^.^

you see, i definately believe in Evolution, however... looking about the world i discovered that i simply cannot believe in it all having been completely random and accidental. there is just too much symbiosis, too much symmetry, too much systematics for that to be the case.

look around. everywhere we go we see ecosystems, in which everything living, non-living and even once-living works together in unison. the Trees produce Oxygen, which we Humans and other Animals breathe in. we exhale Carbon Dioxide, which the Trees absorb to repeat the process. it's a constant cycle.

the Plants grow Flowers which depend on Animals to pollinate so that they can reproduce. some of these Flowers are designed to attract certain specific Insects that other Animals eat. the Insects pollinate the Flower that the Animal would otherwise eat, but when the Animal eats the Insect it pollinates the Flower in the Insect's place.

everywhere we look, individual species have Evolved specificaly to work together with eachother as individual species. that can't happen randomly.

now this got me thinking, if it's not random, than what is it? what could direct this? it couldn't be spontaneous, that just doesn't add up. i remembered a belief that was spoken in many different ways across many different cultures and religions. the general idea that everything functions in both a Microcosm and in a Macrocosm, and that the two are interrelated. "as Above, so Below" is one version of it.

i took a look at it that way. all things are made up of Atoms. Atoms combine to make Elements. Elements combine to make Molecules. Molecules combine to make Cells. Cells combine to make Organs and Muscles and Bones and Bark and Leaves and all kinds of stuff. these varying components combine to make Organism both living and non-living. these Organisms combine to make Ecosystems. Ecosystems combine to make Planets. Planets combine to make Galaxies. it goes on and on and on.

so, with this new point of view in mind i began to think. and i came to an interesting possibility. what if the individual Cells choose their own Evolutionary path? after all, the first living things were Unicellular Organisms. all Evolution began with them. though this theory has of course been argues, i have yet to find any evidence that would suggest a flaw in it. in fact, i've found some interesting supporting evidence. did you know that Cells actually respond to outside stimulous, almost as though they had some sort of nervous system? they might not have thoughts, but we can't prove it, or that they don't have something at least akin to thoughts. if anything, there is evidence that they have some kind of capacity for making decisions.

anywho, feel free to discuss.
PostPosted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 4:34 pm


I'm only going to say that cells respond to outside stimuli because that's how they communicate with each other, whether they be in an organism, or a solitary cell.
The body's nervous cells don't connect to every other part of the body, they rely instead on intercell communication via chemical messaging across gap junctions, and synaptic distances. They can then respond via activation of set intracellular messenging systems...which are long, complicated, and I'm not going to go into. Any desicions they make are based on hard-wired intracellular messanging pathways, which are often tested within the organism. Not always successfully, which leads to immunological diseases like lupus, and chron's.
With uni-cellular organisms they have a protein on their membrane surface which senses a particular chemical. When this chemical reaches a certain concentration within the cells environment it can cause it to activate a new set of genes (Cholera bacteria do this before producing cholera toxin), when based on cells producing the chemical they test for it's called quorum sensing. They're also able to follow 'trails' of chemicals using this sensing device, so they're better able to find sources of nutrition.


...I personally don't think we were designed, or guided, because there are so many flaws in our physiology. If anyone had a say in this lot, I dare say we wouldn't have our air-way so low, and so well connected to the entrance to our digestive tract.
Random mutations make so much more sense to me, of course, my scientific education could have brain-washed me ;D

Catharia


Chieftain Twilight
Captain

Loyal Rogue

14,550 Points
  • Full closet 200
  • Tested Practitioner 250
  • Elocutionist 200
PostPosted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 4:59 pm


well, it realy doesn't convince me that i'm wrong about this to hear that. if anything, i think it supports my theory. see, if this is truely the way that they communicate, then it accounts for the method in which evolution takes (that is, in responce to outside stimulus, causing a slow adaptive mutation in the organism while it is still alive, and surviving hereditarily through DNA).

it makes perfect sense to me. i just can't believe in randomness anymore, not when i see all of this definite patterning and biosynergy. ya know?
PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:50 pm


"I am sorry, I don't understand this Idea of creationism..I think all is random and it would have happened sooner or later. Sorry!!"

Ura the rainbow King

Tipsy Trafficker

11,250 Points
  • Marathon 300
  • Partygoer 500
  • Perfect Attendance 400

Chieftain Twilight
Captain

Loyal Rogue

14,550 Points
  • Full closet 200
  • Tested Practitioner 250
  • Elocutionist 200
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:35 pm


1.) you don't have to be sorry. never appologize for believing something. it's your belief. it only matters to you, it only matters what you think of it.

2.) this isn't creationism. at all. i would apreciate it if you actually payed attention to what was written, realy listened to it, instead of shrugging it off as being the opposite of what you believe in just cause it isn't the thing you believe in. the world isn't cut in half Ura.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:19 pm


Chieftain Twilight
1.) you don't have to be sorry. never appologize for believing something. it's your belief. it only matters to you, it only matters what you think of it.

2.) this isn't creationism. at all. i would apreciate it if you actually payed attention to what was written, realy listened to it, instead of shrugging it off as being the opposite of what you believe in just cause it isn't the thing you believe in. the world isn't cut in half Ura.

"sorry!! I read it all this time..But I don't understand!!"

Ura the rainbow King

Tipsy Trafficker

11,250 Points
  • Marathon 300
  • Partygoer 500
  • Perfect Attendance 400

Chieftain Twilight
Captain

Loyal Rogue

14,550 Points
  • Full closet 200
  • Tested Practitioner 250
  • Elocutionist 200
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:43 pm


Ura the rainbow King
Chieftain Twilight
1.) you don't have to be sorry. never appologize for believing something. it's your belief. it only matters to you, it only matters what you think of it.

2.) this isn't creationism. at all. i would apreciate it if you actually payed attention to what was written, realy listened to it, instead of shrugging it off as being the opposite of what you believe in just cause it isn't the thing you believe in. the world isn't cut in half Ura.

"sorry!! I read it all this time..But I don't understand!!"


that's ok, if you don't understand then you don't understand. smile if you like, i can try to clarify what i mean. just tell me wht about it you don't understand?
PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:00 am


Cells choose their own Evolutionary path? after all, the first living things were Unicellular Organisms. all Evolution began with them. though this theory has of course been argues, i have yet to find any evidence that would suggest a flaw in it. in fact, i've found some interesting supporting evidence. did you know that Cells actually respond to outside stimulous, almost as though they had some sort of nervous system? they might not have thoughts, but we can't prove it, or that they don't have something at least akin to thoughts. if anything, there is evidence that they have some kind of capacity for making decisions.



"i don't understand this part".

Ura the rainbow King

Tipsy Trafficker

11,250 Points
  • Marathon 300
  • Partygoer 500
  • Perfect Attendance 400

Chieftain Twilight
Captain

Loyal Rogue

14,550 Points
  • Full closet 200
  • Tested Practitioner 250
  • Elocutionist 200
PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:00 am


ah. well, what i am saying is that cells will make attempts to retreat from some harmful thing they come into contact with, or such. it's an example of them actually responding to something that effects them.
PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:23 am


"Ohh!! so they make their own chooses!?"

Ura the rainbow King

Tipsy Trafficker

11,250 Points
  • Marathon 300
  • Partygoer 500
  • Perfect Attendance 400

Underworld Priestess

PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 10:53 am


My thought is, whether it be through creation or evolution we had to come from something. It is hard to imagine that the universe has always been there without a real start. I do have mixed feelings on the subject, I could go either way. I think many of our flaws have been through genetic mutation over thousands of years. I mean when you look through history there is a lot of incest going on. Even if you look at the Bible stories of Adam and Eve and then Noah (just as an example, nothing more). The kids were basically marrying each other.
PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:30 pm


according to the way that story goes, they would kind of have to. if all humans came from the same stock, we'd all have the same genetic ancestors. they didn't split up until ******** knows when, and then started in-breeding in even smaller tighter groups, that would have eventually adpated their own individual racial qualities for the areas they were in. but see, while humans did this under the idea that a pure bloodline made one stronger or more fit, the fact of the matter is that this much inbreeding weakens us. we are meant to mate with other races, because we are meant to aquire as much evolutionary advantage as we can.

now, personally, i don't think humanity started with just one set of humans. i am thoroughly convinced in evolution, and i think that a few different lines lead to humanity. what i am saying is, that homo sapiens sapiens (our species) comes from more than one line. i think that there were perhaps 3 or 4 human races that each evolved from something, and then these races of humans spread out and populated more of the earth.

Chieftain Twilight
Captain

Loyal Rogue

14,550 Points
  • Full closet 200
  • Tested Practitioner 250
  • Elocutionist 200

Underworld Priestess

PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 10:39 pm


Chieftain Twilight
according to the way that story goes, they would kind of have to. if all humans came from the same stock, we'd all have the same genetic ancestors. they didn't split up until ******** knows when, and then started in-breeding in even smaller tighter groups, that would have eventually adpated their own individual racial qualities for the areas they were in. but see, while humans did this under the idea that a pure bloodline made one stronger or more fit, the fact of the matter is that this much inbreeding weakens us. we are meant to mate with other races, because we are meant to aquire as much evolutionary advantage as we can.

now, personally, i don't think humanity started with just one set of humans. i am thoroughly convinced in evolution, and i think that a few different lines lead to humanity. what i am saying is, that homo sapiens sapiens (our species) comes from more than one line. i think that there were perhaps 3 or 4 human races that each evolved from something, and then these races of humans spread out and populated more of the earth.


I could buy your theory, I bet you could make money off of it if you wrote a book. You are right about the bloodline thing. I love reading about medieval European royalty and they were all about marrying their cousins in order to ensure that their children would be of the finest bloodline.
PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 10:47 pm


shadowflameguardian
Chieftain Twilight
according to the way that story goes, they would kind of have to. if all humans came from the same stock, we'd all have the same genetic ancestors. they didn't split up until ******** knows when, and then started in-breeding in even smaller tighter groups, that would have eventually adpated their own individual racial qualities for the areas they were in. but see, while humans did this under the idea that a pure bloodline made one stronger or more fit, the fact of the matter is that this much inbreeding weakens us. we are meant to mate with other races, because we are meant to aquire as much evolutionary advantage as we can.

now, personally, i don't think humanity started with just one set of humans. i am thoroughly convinced in evolution, and i think that a few different lines lead to humanity. what i am saying is, that homo sapiens sapiens (our species) comes from more than one line. i think that there were perhaps 3 or 4 human races that each evolved from something, and then these races of humans spread out and populated more of the earth.


I could buy your theory, I bet you could make money off of it if you wrote a book. You are right about the bloodline thing. I love reading about medieval European royalty and they were all about marrying their cousins in order to ensure that their children would be of the finest bloodline.


heh. ya never know. sweatdrop i suppose i should try, but see i've never been very good at writing very large works. maybe wen i get my novels written, and have the practice ad skill under my belt, i'll take a whack at it. 3nodding

Chieftain Twilight
Captain

Loyal Rogue

14,550 Points
  • Full closet 200
  • Tested Practitioner 250
  • Elocutionist 200

Catharia

PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 4:59 pm


Research into mtDNA (that is, mitchondrial DNA), which is passed down by your maternal side alone shows that there are about 7 sisters from which humanity descended (note: not all seven were around at the same time). They're usually called the daughters of eve.
You can even get your mtDNA analysed to see which sister you're descended from. Unfortunately when they did mine, my mtDNA had too many unusual mutations to show which sister I'm descended from (I have trouble with all DNA analysis, apparently my DNA is screwed up enough to not be standard human, but not enough to make me non-human xd ). Some people use that sort of thing as justification they've got fae/vulcan/timelord blood in them somewhere along the line...I'm tempted, but I don't bleed green.

Information for the curious:
Book
The Clans

((I'm not really here to debate, just add information, because it's fun 3nodding ))
Reply
Discussion & Debate District

Goto Page: 1 2 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum