What are your opinions on this?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/evolution/7550033/Missing-link-between-man-and-apes-found.html
Personally, I'm not sure what to make of it. They've claimed to have found one of these before, but it ended up being a false alarm. Could this really be it?
Here are a few of the comments to the article.
"Good grief, these scientists sure are desperate or the media just doesn't get it. First off, if evolution on a macro scale even turns out to be true, there isn't just one missing link but many intermediate fossils. Secondly, what is up with the fake picture? Where is the picture of the fossil? Notice where it says most of what they have are just teeth? WHat a house of cards..."
"'Missing link between man and apes found'
2ND PARAGRAPH: "Scientists believe the almost-complete fossilised skeleton belonged to a previously-unknown type of early human ancestor that MAY have been a intermediate stage as ape-men evolved into the first species of advanced humans, Homo habilis."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/evolution/7550033/Missing-link-between-man-and-apes-found.html
Personally, I'm not sure what to make of it. They've claimed to have found one of these before, but it ended up being a false alarm. Could this really be it?
Here are a few of the comments to the article.
"Good grief, these scientists sure are desperate or the media just doesn't get it. First off, if evolution on a macro scale even turns out to be true, there isn't just one missing link but many intermediate fossils. Secondly, what is up with the fake picture? Where is the picture of the fossil? Notice where it says most of what they have are just teeth? WHat a house of cards..."
"'Missing link between man and apes found'
2ND PARAGRAPH: "Scientists believe the almost-complete fossilised skeleton belonged to a previously-unknown type of early human ancestor that MAY have been a intermediate stage as ape-men evolved into the first species of advanced humans, Homo habilis."