|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 2:09 pm
Pretty standard.
I was wondering if there's anything I could do to fix the ratios to be sure I draw into some form of the Level Eater/Quickdraw combo...because about 30% of the time I end up needing to stall till I draw it and can go on the offensive.
Main end-move is Cold Wave + Road Warrior + 1 or 2 The Calculator + Junk Warrior; pretty standard.
Note: number of *'s = nuber of cards I need to sctually get the number I say
Tribute Monsters:
3 Quickdraw Synchron ***
Non-Tribute Monsters:
3 Junk Synchron
3 Marauding Captain
3 Level Eater ***
3 Tuningware ***
2 The Calculator * (pathetic, I know)
1 Dandylion *
1 Sangan
1 Quillbolt Hedgehog * (also pathetic)
Spells:
2 Tribute to the Doomed * (could have sworn I had them, must have lost one)
2 Enemy Controller **
2 Inferno Reckless Summon **
1 Lightning Vortex
1 Giant Trunade
1 Heavy Storm
1 Scapegoat
1 Cold Wave
1 Brain Control *
Traps:
3 Limit Reverse ***
2 Bottomless Trap Hole
1 Call of the Haunted
1 Mirror Force * (lost mah baby T crying T )
1 Solemn Judgment
Extra Deck:
3 Road Warrior
3 Nitro Warrior
3 Turbo Warrior
3 Junk Warrior
1 Stardust Dragon
1 Goyo Guardian
1 Armory Arm / Ally of Justice Catastor (probably Catastor since it's more available)
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:17 pm
..... neutral I really don't know what to say to this. Why NOT the calculator? Since road synchron is basically one of the mains cards I summon, it's an instant 2 monsters with 3000 attack. Hell, add in Junk synchron and you have a lineup up 3000, 4500, and 6800 Game over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:23 pm
lol yeah i think its an awsome idea. but i think take out the tributew to the doomed and put in two more lightning vortex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:28 pm
shrab lol yeah i think its an awsome idea. but i think take out the tributew to the doomed and put in two more lightning vortex. I considered trading one tribute for a lightning, but the trade off is that I wouldn't be able to clear the field if the opponent had a face-down. At least one tribute is staying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:34 pm
true but its still not much for discarding from your hand. well i guess late game maybe XD so have u tested it yet?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:52 pm
shrab true but its still not much for discarding from your hand. well i guess late game maybe XD so have u tested it yet? yes, with proxies hence where the 30% statistic of me not drawing into quickdraw comes in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:59 pm
hmmm maybe u can use flying kamakiri to bring him out a little faster. i mean it would be open ofcoarse but if u had something down to protect it then kamakiri wouldnt be a terrible idea.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:06 pm
Why no Foolish?
Why no Trag?
Why no De-Synchro's?
Tribute to the doomed could be made better trap versions.
Solemn and cold Wave are pretty lame right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:37 pm
Pheso ..... neutral I really don't know what to say to this. Why NOT the calculator? Since road synchron is basically one of the mains cards I summon, it's an instant 2 monsters with 3000 attack. Hell, add in Junk synchron and you have a lineup up 3000, 4500, and 6800 Game over. Ah, I see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:22 pm
armycat jockamoe Why no Foolish? Why no Trag? Why no De-Synchro's? Tribute to the doomed could be made better trap versions. Solemn and cold Wave are pretty lame right now. In order: Foolish isn't useful without something to combo it with. Trag is ******** expensive and I forgot to buy JUMP that month. Didn't think of De-Synchros...will find a place for them in case of destruction threat. What? They've always been staples for me. One could argue that Cold Wave sucks right now...but Solemn stays. I originally had Dark Bribes in place of the Bottomless Trap Holes...but all the bribes I could find were sold out and I don't feel like paying $10 a card (IE: Gemini structure deck).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:33 pm
Pheso armycat jockamoe Why no Foolish? Why no Trag? Why no De-Synchro's? Tribute to the doomed could be made better trap versions. Solemn and cold Wave are pretty lame right now. In order: Foolish isn't useful without something to combo it with. Trag is ******** expensive and I forgot to buy JUMP that month. Didn't think of De-Synchros...will find a place for them in case of destruction threat. What? They've always been staples for me. One could argue that Cold Wave sucks right now...but Solemn stays. I originally had Dark Bribes in place of the Bottomless Trap Holes...but all the bribes I could find were sold out and I don't feel like paying $10 a card (IE: Gemini structure deck). Foolish hits Bolts, Stealers, Treeborn, and Dandylion; all things worth running. Alright Trag is expensive I'll give you that. Sadly it's not a quickplay, but with tuningware it makes a draw engine and a quick method to change your monster from one to another. Alright Solemn is ok, I just don't like paying half for this kind of deck. I must say though Cold Wave is pretty meh right now, especially here. Bribe sucks, even more so when you would remove Bottomless for them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:45 pm
so, at this point
-2 Tributes
+2 Foolish
-1 Cold Wave
-1 Inferno
+2 De-Synchro
better?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:16 pm
Pheso so, at this point -2 Tributes +2 Foolish -1 Cold Wave -1 Inferno +2 De-Synchro better? Tributes are fine to drop. I'd say lightning V, or Trunade over Inferno.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:18 pm
armycat jockamoe Pheso so, at this point -2 Tributes +2 Foolish -1 Cold Wave -1 Inferno +2 De-Synchro better? Tributes are fine to drop. I'd say lightning V, or Trunade over Inferno. agrees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
