|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 5:03 pm
What type of cards are the touhes in the game magic before Samurai other cards in the game.Any others good cards but these are the best.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 5:30 pm
slivers and dragons can both be pretty nasty . Dragons are evil in a mana acceleration deck - I have a deck that gets a 10/5 out by 3rd turn .
Slivers can be nasty as well , especially if used with straegy . too many people make rainbow sliver decks without realizing that with some thinking and the right enchantments you can make a fairly usefull two color deck with them .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 6:02 pm
it all depends on the sorceries, instants, and enchantments of a deck before pickign a stongest creature.
if your using green only mana acceleration, really expensive beasts are murderous
if your using quick red burn, some goblins and some elementals are vicious
if your using counterspells, the smallest blue creature is deadly
if your using creature destruction. anything is evil.
if your using coma (pacafism, stasis that type) anything small is deadly.
(just the absolutely most basic color strategies)
so there isn't one, if your trying to find one, you need to look at the deck that type is run in. Angels are deadly, but only if they are in a good deck. same with dragons, and just about any other creature type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 12:11 am
How come I don't see wurms on the list 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 1:14 am
GreenRose25 How come I don't see wurms on the list My answer to that: A better wurm would be: My pick for a tough creature though would be:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 11:42 am
The Lady Giyan GreenRose25 How come I don't see wurms on the list My answer to that: A better wurm would be: My pick for a tough creature though would be: but seriously, if the deck is investing in Fat, it should at least protect them from spot removals. oh, and the thread is about "tough? creatures" and not "how to deal with them". i think either Dragons or Wurms (over elementals) have the highest average p/t (no calculation, just a look-over) i just think Dragons are more iconic and got my vote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 3:18 pm
wait if you mean biggest. Beast comes with some pretty nasty stuff. along with Dragon and Wurm.
so if you mean biggest card (P+T) then it's probably one of those three creature types.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 9:02 pm
Leviathan's are pretty tough, considering there are only three of them.
Seriously though, the toughest creatures , without using the Firebreathing ability a lot of dragons have, have to belong to green. He isn't sure whether to go with Wurms or Beasts though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 11:08 am
Albern Leviathan's are pretty tough, considering there are only three of them.
Seriously though, the toughest creatures , without using the Firebreathing ability a lot of dragons have, have to belong to green. He isn't sure whether to go with Wurms or Beasts though. more beasts then wurms, but the power is more spread out, you get little beasts and really big beasts. but wurms come in only a few sizes (1/1 in blue, 9/14 in green and then everywhere in between)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 8:11 pm
wellwisher Albern Leviathan's are pretty tough, considering there are only three of them.
Seriously though, the toughest creatures , without using the Firebreathing ability a lot of dragons have, have to belong to green. He isn't sure whether to go with Wurms or Beasts though. more beasts then wurms, but the power is more spread out, you get little beasts and really big beasts. but wurms come in only a few sizes (1/1 in blue, 9/14 in green and then everywhere in between) technically thats WG not just green my 2 cents? dragons.. flying and kinda big
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 4:33 am
The toughest creature is BFM.......99/99.....and can't be blocked by fewer then 3 creatures...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:00 am
I love my thorn elementals. One of many cards that can kill my opponent in my deck. mrgreen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 5:20 pm
wombats,if used right,in about 6-8 turns you can get a 50/10 ish double life gain,pro creatures,vigilence that cant be the target of spells or abilities but as a single creature i would have to say solarion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 9:03 pm
Solarion is nice. Any creature, even BoP can be big with pumps. But creatures that are big on their own, and cost effective, I would have to say the convoke fatties are nice. Also, Phytohydra, Vinelasher Kudzu, and Rootkin Ally are nice if used right.
Other potential fatties are Scion of the Wild, Squirrel Mobb (Gang rape!), and Molimo, Maro Sorcerer.
But as for for creatures that are hard to get rid of, I'd say anything with toughness higher than 5, black, and can't be targeted by spells or abilities. Yup yup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 3:52 am
In all honesty.. I'd have to say Angels... Just for Akroma, Angel of Wrath and Pristine Angel... I have a semi-angel deck, and between Akroma, Pristine and Desolation Angel with the kicker, my foe is pretty much screwed. >>;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
