|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 3:20 am
Fred's art is amusing, but far from impressive. The script is interesting, I admit, but the art is FAR FROM IMPRESSIVE. But people still love it. I mean, the script can't be THAT good. Than again, it's one of those more popular Webcomics, so perhaps it is, because the art is far from impressive.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 2:15 pm
it's kind of like that snowball effect thing. It's been around for a while now, and way back near it's beginning, a few people found it who liked it, they spread the word, more people find out about it from other people and sites of fans recomending it and the more time goes by, it keeps growing exponentialy, plus on top of that, it's got a printed version to that draws in people who don't normaly read web comics. 3nodding
also, I've always found that whole quality of not being over the top a sort of comfy thing, like it's not to draining on you to read it. It's nice and relaxing in a strange sort of way.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:51 pm
plus if it was all about the art and and no story line, it would be well drawn but incredibly boring or incredibly confusing....
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 5:12 pm
or both! gonk I think story line is first priority any way in a comic, or it won't matter that i IS a comic, nobody will read it, just look at the pictures and leave, most people probably never coming back or buying any more of the printed version. That sort of thing is really insulting to the creator I'd think to have people totaly ignore your effort at a comic and just look at the pictures. Think of it like this- a video game won't be played for graphics alone either if the game sucks, people will like a lesser quality graphics game if the game play is better. 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:14 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 6:40 am
well, in an odd way it is outside anime and manga. For it is about people who are *outside* anime and manga.
One aspect here - 1. otaku
It's the story of an otaku...for some of us obsessives, he's a lot like us. I always find it oddly creepy how many of the personality traits I share. Piro is shown with many flaws... and for me, there is somthing oddly encoraging in that.
We obsessives aren't being mad fun of. Nor are we being called under the impressesion that we are really great.
I like seeing an otaku not being made a cliche and laughed at as so often happens.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 6:49 am
Aspect 2.- missing 'Cliche' on the dartboardEveryone of the characters have their place in cliche. Piro - otakuLargo - comic reliefkimiko - sad girlPing - urber shojo/innocentYuki - schoolgirlHOWEVER, Fred plays his story to narrowly avoid most cliche twists, telling the story in a far more realistic way. Each of the characters have their flaws.... very important. human flaws <--- important. These feel like real people. And so Piro - no confidence, with many of the flaws and problems (low-self esteem) of obsessivesLargo - even he has to deal with the police....ok, I admit, there not that much realitykimiko - her attitude is pretty self-destructive sometimesPing - she can be a pain in the butt. now urber shojo normally doesn't make a habbit of thatYuki - this one should be obviouischiche comes from somewhere, a stereotype that comes from....reality. Fred taps into this 'reality'. ------ F34R FR3DZ R34L1TY - It's just like mine... heart
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 6:59 am
Aspect 3. Friends (extention of number 2)
Piro and Kimiko - the problem two have friends. ----- Just as, you and I have friends. However, it is not always easy to talk to them. Kimiko feels bad about putting her problems onto Erika, and Piro....well, he and Largo aren't on the same wave-length
again, reality. Piro and Largo are both otaku in their own way. However, they really have very little to say to each other
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 7:14 am
Aspect 4. - It's background
Megatokyo's appeal perhaps falls partly into how many people it reached in it's early days.
As it started as a one-shot laugh a day type of story. It brought it many people who wanted to read somthing like that.
However, as Fred gave up that format, the story appealed to a different type of crowd. However, many of the original fans wanted to know what happened to the characters, and so....stuck around also.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 7:15 am
and those posts illistrate what i think -
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 12:35 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 2:43 pm
Thanks Bluecherry! hmm...I feel strongest personal feeling for the aspect in my first post though. I really think it's very important that Piro is not made a more sympathetic character. -poor guy. What is it that draws Megatokyo to you the most?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 2:49 pm
William C. Wonka Fred's art is amusing, but far from impressive. The script is interesting, I admit, but the art is FAR FROM IMPRESSIVE. But people still love it. I mean, the script can't be THAT good. Than again, it's one of those more popular Webcomics, so perhaps it is, because the art is far from impressive. Such is the fate of works of writing, Wonka. (i'll speak about novel writing here, as there is still not much 'history' in webcomicry) There are many works that aren't well written... However, that oft is dismissed if the work introduces a unique or interesting idea. For example, Antony Burgess's 'A Clockwork Orange' was critisised for not being very well written, as was the 'Battle Royale' novel. However, that didn't make a difference to just about everbody of the time/place knowing these titles. I found it very irksome that you felt it somehow nessesary to write 'far from impressive' three times. I've been reading Megatokyo since the early days and it really does seem rather rude.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 4:37 pm
Most of my friends read Megatokyo almost solely for Largo. I meantioned something he did once and they wanted an explaination. I even got a l33t hater to wind up speaking l33+ within 2 months just from reading it.
Without getting analitical about it all, if you don't read for the insanity and violence (Largo side), you read for the quirky relationships and delimmas that the characters face. Heck, even Largo was recent faced with one of those. Something to the tune of "Your game is yours. I am not forced to play, nor will I be. Go find someone willing to play." In translation it's something like "Your life is your own. Leave me out of it."
Basically, violence or self-inquzitiveness. Insanity or emotion. (Choose wisely.) Anything that can be composed of both of those factors at once is sure to have a large following. In anime it can be represented as something like Fullmetal Alchemist.
Personally, I find that fans that love somthing purely because of the images and pictures are shallow. Story's what counts.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 4:45 am
alicelights William C. Wonka Fred's art is amusing, but far from impressive. The script is interesting, I admit, but the art is FAR FROM IMPRESSIVE. But people still love it. I mean, the script can't be THAT good. Than again, it's one of those more popular Webcomics, so perhaps it is, because the art is far from impressive. Such is the fate of works of writing, Wonka. (i'll speak about novel writing here, as there is still not much 'history' in webcomicry) There are many works that aren't well written... However, that oft is dismissed if the work introduces a unique or interesting idea. For example, Antony Burgess's 'A Clockwork Orange' was critisised for not being very well written, as was the 'Battle Royale' novel. However, that didn't make a difference to just about everbody of the time/place knowing these titles. I found it very irksome that you felt it somehow nessesary to write 'far from impressive' three times. I've been reading Megatokyo since the early days and it really does seem rather rude. - Edited slightly -
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|