|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 12:25 am
What do you think?
Personally I like more TNA it's more for the guys unlike WWE where's it's for the kids now. I miss attitude era wwe or wwf sad
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 9:14 am
TNA is boring and poorly managed. I watch it every so often for a laugh. They used to be pretty good but now it's just old WWE skits with old WWE superstars.I watch WWE because in the rare occasion they do something right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Warrior Zolaga Ramora
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:26 pm
Zolaga Ramora TNA is boring and poorly managed. I watch it every so often for a laugh. They used to be pretty good but now it's just old WWE skits with old WWE superstars.I watch WWE because in the rare occasion they do something right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:23 pm
I don't even watch TNA that much... Just catching the odd video on DailyMotion doesn't count... xD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 5:58 pm
if i wanna watch TNA ill just go back and watch WCW at least that was entertaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:38 pm
I prefer TNA, they may use old storylines. But it's better than using the same storylines since 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:54 pm
A couple of years back I would say TNA because it seemed everyone had a chance to shine and it was all about the X Division. Now its just relying on old people (MEM?) to get ratings and they look like mere shadows of their former selves. Plus everybody is joining a heel faction thats there's almost no one to really look up to. It seems the faces just get squash at every turn.
At least in WWE the ECW is a brand where young stars could shine and Smackdown is the place to be to see some great talent (except Batista). RAW is becoming better but mostly due to Legacy and some of the mid-carders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 4:11 pm
I use to like WWE and TNA the same when TNA first started, but once TNA hit Spike TV it just got boring and lame.
TNA feels like a bad atempt at WCW/ECW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 4:16 pm
Lumina Cross A couple of years back I would say TNA because it seemed everyone had a chance to shine and it was all about the X Division. Now its just relying on old people (MEM?) to get ratings and they look like mere shadows of their former selves. Plus everybody is joining a heel faction thats there's almost no one to really look up to. It seems the faces just get squash at every turn. At least in WWE the ECW is a brand where young stars could shine and Smackdown is the place to be to see some great talent (except Batista). RAW is becoming better but mostly due to Legacy and some of the mid-carders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:09 am
Yuke of XV Lumina Cross A couple of years back I would say TNA because it seemed everyone had a chance to shine and it was all about the X Division. Now its just relying on old people (MEM?) to get ratings and they look like mere shadows of their former selves. Plus everybody is joining a heel faction thats there's almost no one to really look up to. It seems the faces just get squash at every turn. At least in WWE the ECW is a brand where young stars could shine and Smackdown is the place to be to see some great talent (except Batista). RAW is becoming better but mostly due to Legacy and some of the mid-carders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:10 pm
Harli the Pervy Sage Yuke of XV Lumina Cross A couple of years back I would say TNA because it seemed everyone had a chance to shine and it was all about the X Division. Now its just relying on old people (MEM?) to get ratings and they look like mere shadows of their former selves. Plus everybody is joining a heel faction thats there's almost no one to really look up to. It seems the faces just get squash at every turn. At least in WWE the ECW is a brand where young stars could shine and Smackdown is the place to be to see some great talent (except Batista). RAW is becoming better but mostly due to Legacy and some of the mid-carders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:27 pm
Valen The Blade Harli the Pervy Sage Yuke of XV Lumina Cross A couple of years back I would say TNA because it seemed everyone had a chance to shine and it was all about the X Division. Now its just relying on old people (MEM?) to get ratings and they look like mere shadows of their former selves. Plus everybody is joining a heel faction thats there's almost no one to really look up to. It seems the faces just get squash at every turn. At least in WWE the ECW is a brand where young stars could shine and Smackdown is the place to be to see some great talent (except Batista). RAW is becoming better but mostly due to Legacy and some of the mid-carders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 1:37 pm
hard to pick between those two...they are both so amazing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:21 pm
Yea but WWE has hotter chicks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:51 pm
rudeboy719 What do you think? Personally I like more TNA it's more for the guys unlike WWE where's it's for the kids now. I miss attitude era wwe or wwf sad i agree with the missing wwf/wwe attitude era TNA is just terrible for TNA impact they ALWAYS have it on florida unlike WWE they go very where and its more enterining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
