|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:40 am
*Semi Rant*
My fellow guilders, I'm am sick. So utterly sick. So god awfully, nauseatingly, ******** SICK of seeing retarded Twitards prancing around DA. For you see, lately these twits have fallen into the trend of using their crappy Photoshop skills to make famous people 'zomg like a Sparklepire!!!!'
Seriously it PISSES me off so much. What's worse is these idiots seem to think it's perfectly fine to grab random photos they've snatched randomly off the web, edit them without permission (by which I mean usually changing the eyes to gold and dragging the contrast down a few filters. Ooooo artistic!), and slap them up on DA oozing on and on about how fantastic their work is and how 'sexy' that celeb would be as a Twilight character.
This. Is. Against. The. Deviant Rules. Images of celebrities are not 'stock' photos (photos designed for photoshop artists to edit). Nor should they be treated as such.
The main thorn in my side is this little cow:
http://edwardsbabii414.deviantart.com/art/Hugh-Freaking-Jackman-0-0-129923894
who insists she had permission to 'edit' sparklepire an image of Hugh Jackman. Which is total and utter s**t considering the photograph is clearly professionally taken, looks as though it is either a movie still, or meant for an article or magazine ad, and I highly doubt a professional photographer would allow an air headed teenager permission to make THEIR work into something so craptastic. She also seems to imply in her authors comment that she saw the photo and changed it, which supports the case that it's stolen.
I am currently trying to find an original version of the image as I feel I should call her on her bullshit. I don't like people who upload stuff onto art sites that isn't theirs. If anyone can help me I'd love a hand.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:36 am
That makes me nauseous. That's even worse than recolours of Sonic screenshots. I really want to get the original image and a knife, run up to her house and start screaming at her and rubbing the image in her own face.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:52 am
Sorry, I really don't know where to find a picture... Have you tried googling it...?
I think you can report her for general art theft either way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:01 am
Those plagiarist swine must be taught a lesson! And since I do have a DA account, just like with She Promised You Cookies, it'll be epic when we report the swine!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 8:51 am
>< Twitards= living proof twilight destroys brain cells. Do drugs, kiddies, not twilight.
But the lil idiot does claim she had permission and that she knew it wasn't a stock photo. I'm interpreting that as Twidard-ese for "I give myself permission to steal this photo and change it to OMG HAWT SPARKLEPIRE!!111!!" stare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 8:55 am
Damn and here I was thinking of going back to DA. I'm not sure I want to if I have to look at loads of that s**t! How dare they do that to tasteful actors! stressed stressed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:54 am
Crystal Kyuketsuki Sorry, I really don't know where to find a picture... Have you tried googling it...? I think you can report her for general art theft either way. I have tried googling it with no luck so far. But I feel like I /have/ seen that image before and I am not giving up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:59 am
Metallithrasha Damn and here I was thinking of going back to DA. I'm not sure I want to if I have to look at loads of that s**t! How dare they do that to tasteful actors! stressed stressed *sarcasm* But Hugh Jackman ish hawt and Twilight ish hawt. :O *End sarcasm* On a side note I find it hilarious that they've all jumped the Hugh Jackman bandwagon only after Wolverine in spite of the fact that he's been playing the said character for quite a few years beforehand and was frowned upon by 65% of his retarded fangirls in the past as being 'scruffy' and 'ugly'. -_-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 11:23 am
Ugh.
I hate how they think they can submit movie stills and posters, saying it's AAAARRTTT!11!!!!
Sure, it's art. If you're a blind ******** monkey.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 1:33 pm
Report her.
That's a copyrighted picture, and no one said she had permission to edit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:30 pm
So you'd need to find the original as in, what it was used for?
I found that picture a couple of times over the internet but I don't know if they would be useful in reporting art theft.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:36 pm
twilight_is_for_idiots Metallithrasha Damn and here I was thinking of going back to DA. I'm not sure I want to if I have to look at loads of that s**t! How dare they do that to tasteful actors! stressed stressed *sarcasm* But Hugh Jackman ish hawt and Twilight ish hawt. :O *End sarcasm* On a side note I find it hilarious that they've all jumped the Hugh Jackman bandwagon only after Wolverine in spite of the fact that he's been playing the said character for quite a few years beforehand and was frowned upon by 65% of his retarded fangirls in the past as being 'scruffy' and 'ugly'. -_- Yeah he's only been in four X Men movies now. Just because of that they think "he's sooo hawt!!!!1111!!!!". If he wasn't in that they wouldn't have even heard of him. I should try to find that picture, I'd like to shove it in that person's face and say "You stole that!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:50 pm
I got around to reporting it as General Art Theft. If they think it's stolen they'll remove it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:08 pm
Try looking up his portfolio or his website
It looks like it belongs there because of the style and the way he's standing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
