|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 10:23 am
People claim to have seen this monster that lives in enormous lakes.
I do believe in the lochness, and I also believe in Big foot.. Mainly because a friend of mine came back from a trip and told me about stuff he heard there and saw during the nights.
People dedicate themselves to try to find these beasts of nature... And they never do.. Why is this? Maybe the creatures are just shy, and don't want to be seen.. And when they are seen, it's by a small piece of luck for the person.
Is it a waste to try to find these monsters? Or should we go more into it to see what we can ACTUALLY find out... I mean, if there are creatures like this that can somehow hide themselves from the world. What else is there that is on Earth that we don't know about. And how much could we learn if one was caught or found dead? Obviously a lot....
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 3:25 pm
I think it's possible for these creatures to be out there. Just look at the panda. That animal was thought to be a mythical creature for centuries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 3:45 pm
I recall hearing that every lake on that line of latitude has a beast of similar nature in it.
confused
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 6:09 pm
Actually, the Loch Ness Monster refers specifically to a sea monster of sorts that lives in Loch Ness, which incidentally is in Scotland, and has additionally been pretty definitively proven to be nonexistent.
I do not believe in the existence of Nessie, of Bigfoot, of the Mothman, or any other such creature. I do believe that there are creatures out there that we have yet to discover, some of which may seem fantastic in comparison to those which we have already discovered, but the ones which are frequently mentioned? No, I can't say that I believe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:56 pm
I don't believe in them, though I am fine with people who are believers. But people who spend all their money and time searching for these things, in my opinion, are ridiculous. I just don't quite understand what they mean to do if they do find something. Maybe get some money, maybe become slightly famous. There's really no reason to search for them. And I doubt it would alter everyday lives if bigfoot was found.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 6:34 am
I don't believe in them on the term that no matter how magnificent they appear to be they'd have to mate in order to keep their species going on and if there was a large enough number to sustain them and considering where they have been seen they would have been formally discovered long ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:41 am
I will always believe Landshark exists... somewhere *looks out rainy window*
it could be a possibility that a hord of creatures could live deep enough in a watery body to be temporarily undetectable for now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 8:20 am
CH0Z0 I will always believe Landshark exists... somewhere *looks out rainy window* it could be a possibility that a hord of creatures could live deep enough in a watery body to be temporarily undetectable for now. We've mapped the ocean floor using sonar. It doesn't get much deeper than that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:05 am
Tabihito CH0Z0 I will always believe Landshark exists... somewhere *looks out rainy window* it could be a possibility that a hord of creatures could live deep enough in a watery body to be temporarily undetectable for now. We've mapped the ocean floor using sonar. It doesn't get much deeper than that. Sonar can't see inside awkwardly positioned caves though, or about any cave for that matter without coming back funky.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 11:43 am
CH0Z0 Tabihito CH0Z0 I will always believe Landshark exists... somewhere *looks out rainy window* it could be a possibility that a hord of creatures could live deep enough in a watery body to be temporarily undetectable for now. We've mapped the ocean floor using sonar. It doesn't get much deeper than that. Sonar can't see inside awkwardly positioned caves though, or about any cave for that matter without coming back funky. Nor is it 100% reliable in detecting what lies below. Tab, you give humans to much credit. The fact is there is a lot we don't know about the natural world or the animals in it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 11:48 am
Vajapocalypse CH0Z0 Tabihito CH0Z0 I will always believe Landshark exists... somewhere *looks out rainy window* it could be a possibility that a hord of creatures could live deep enough in a watery body to be temporarily undetectable for now. We've mapped the ocean floor using sonar. It doesn't get much deeper than that. Sonar can't see inside awkwardly positioned caves though, or about any cave for that matter without coming back funky. Nor is it 100% reliable in detecting what lies below. Tab, you give humans to much credit. The fact is there is a lot we don't know about the natural world or the animals in it. Exactly, we're still finding animals and new species.. So there is possibilities of these things to actually live. Chozo- If a landshark is ever found... Wow just wow @.@ Divine- Yeah, plenty of large lakes have been said to have something similar to the lochness monster in it. (It's possible) Tabahito- o>O mothman?! *Googles it* .. Vaja- I remember when the Panda "didn't" exist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 11:54 am
The Rise Against song "The Strength to go on" wisely states: "What we are is the sum of a thousand lies, what we know is almost nothing at all."
I believe that there are many things we still don't know. If we haven't discovered all the species in rainforests yet, how could we find some possibly non-existent creature in who-knows-where?
Also, I believe that there may be intelligent life on other planets. That's just my opinion. How could Earth be the ONLY planet that can support life? What are the odds of that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 12:00 pm
Vajapocalypse CH0Z0 Tabihito CH0Z0 I will always believe Landshark exists... somewhere *looks out rainy window* it could be a possibility that a hord of creatures could live deep enough in a watery body to be temporarily undetectable for now. We've mapped the ocean floor using sonar. It doesn't get much deeper than that. Sonar can't see inside awkwardly positioned caves though, or about any cave for that matter without coming back funky. Nor is it 100% reliable in detecting what lies below. Tab, you give humans to much credit. The fact is there is a lot we don't know about the natural world or the animals in it. it's pretty accurate, but I wouldn't want to be the guy who writes down in the lab "ocean floor officially charted blah blah blah a date". Since we don't know hardly anything about this planet, seeing as they say landshark doesn't exist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 12:12 pm
CH0Z0 Vajapocalypse CH0Z0 Tabihito CH0Z0 I will always believe Landshark exists... somewhere *looks out rainy window* it could be a possibility that a hord of creatures could live deep enough in a watery body to be temporarily undetectable for now. We've mapped the ocean floor using sonar. It doesn't get much deeper than that. Sonar can't see inside awkwardly positioned caves though, or about any cave for that matter without coming back funky. Nor is it 100% reliable in detecting what lies below. Tab, you give humans to much credit. The fact is there is a lot we don't know about the natural world or the animals in it. it's pretty accurate, but I wouldn't want to be the guy who writes down in the lab "ocean floor officially charted blah blah blah a date". Since we don't know hardly anything about this planet, seeing as they say landshark doesn't exist. I'd place my bets on megalodon still roaming the seas over the existence of the landshark. A lot of it is up to interpretation. We can only guess what it is we are seeing without solid proof. Even then we aren't searching the same areas 24/7 so you can't say for certain what is there and what's not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 12:37 pm
Well..... I don't particularly believe in those creatures....
But Nessie.. idk. I've seen pictures of those huuuuuuuge water snakes, so, why not?
As to Bigfoot and such.... hrm not sure. I doubt it...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
