|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:10 am
Ask me a question about communism that you need clearing up on.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:34 am
If Communism was a fruit drink flavor, what flavor would it be?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:14 am
Comrade Rob If Communism was a fruit drink flavor, what flavor would it be? I don't know, but there'd certainly be an abundance of flavour! Har har.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:32 am
Comrade Rob If Communism was a fruit drink flavor, what flavor would it be? 4 parts orange juice 1 part pineapple juice will get you the flavour, though I am yet to hear a name for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:42 am
Orange-Juche!? roflroflrofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:10 pm
Comrade Rob Orange-Juche!? roflroflrofl Definitly ^.^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:12 pm
SoViEtTaNkT34 Comrade Rob Orange-Juche!? roflroflrofl Definitly ^.^ I lol'd...but you should add food coloring to make it red.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:27 pm
Comrade Rob Orange-Juche!? roflroflrofl But that ignores the pineapple...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:23 pm
Pomegranate and black cherry juice. Two and a half shots of vodka. Shake with ice and pour. Garnish with orange slice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 3:15 pm
Gracchvs why do your views fail so hard?
Additionally but not Communism related. Why are you so lame?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 5:52 pm
Comrade Mann Gracchvs why do your views fail so hard? This is a trick your location has played on your perception. See, you are a Mandelite who outright rejects Trotskyism. Even Mandel didn't. But then, he really doesn't matter at all does he? I mean, with the long-wave theory of capitalism what does he come up with? In the 60's: We are in a wave of growth. Because of this, the labour aristocracy can be bought off. Our tasks, according to Mandel therefore do not include revolution. The workers are just too well bribed to come over We need to 'radicalise them.' In the 90's(in fact, since the crash in the 70's), and I assume now: We are in a wave of decline. There will be a mass of layoffs and such. Our tasks according to Mandel therefore do not include revolution. The workers need jobs in order to hold the bourgeoisie hostage after all so we need to fight for employment and other nice things. So yeah, from you perspective within the marsh, everything looks like fail to you. The moment you reject the non-marxist theories of Mandel you will be open to a whole new world of awesome. I hope to see you here one day. Comrade Mann Additionally but not Communism related. Why are you so lame? You must have some serious issues that you are projecting, constantly, onto me. Is there something you need to get off your chest? Some untold failure maybe? Maybe you have failed to rise to the occasion, and you no longer feel worthy? If so, It is okay, she is still into you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 6:17 pm
Louis-Auguste Robespierre Comrade Mann Gracchvs why do your views fail so hard? This is a trick your location has played on your perception. See, you are a Mandelite who outright rejects Trotskyism. Even Mandel didn't. But then, he really doesn't matter at all does he? I mean, with the long-wave theory of capitalism what does he come up with? In the 60's: We are in a wave of growth. Because of this, the labour aristocracy can be bought off. Our tasks, according to Mandel therefore do not include revolution. The workers are just too well bribed to come over We need to 'radicalise them.' In the 90's(in fact, since the crash in the 70's), and I assume now: We are in a wave of decline. There will be a mass of layoffs and such. Our tasks according to Mandel therefore do not include revolution. The workers need jobs in order to hold the bourgeoisie hostage after all so we need to fight for employment and other nice things. So yeah, from you perspective within the marsh, everything looks like fail to you. The moment you reject the non-marxist theories of Mandel you will be open to a whole new world of awesome. I hope to see you here one day. Comrade Mann Additionally but not Communism related. Why are you so lame? You must have some serious issues that you are projecting, constantly, onto me. Is there something you need to get off your chest? Some untold failure maybe? Maybe you have failed to rise to the occasion, and you no longer feel worthy? If so, It is okay, she is still into you!You are evil, Gracchvs. Just like Hello Kitty. Not lame... you don't get to be cool like FDR razz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 6:19 pm
Oh, and the fact that Mike is largely without interwebs means that I am his stand-in to kill you. Beware. mrgreen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:03 pm
Lady Merewyn Louis-Auguste Robespierre Comrade Mann Gracchvs why do your views fail so hard? This is a trick your location has played on your perception. See, you are a Mandelite who outright rejects Trotskyism. Even Mandel didn't. But then, he really doesn't matter at all does he? I mean, with the long-wave theory of capitalism what does he come up with? In the 60's: We are in a wave of growth. Because of this, the labour aristocracy can be bought off. Our tasks, according to Mandel therefore do not include revolution. The workers are just too well bribed to come over We need to 'radicalise them.' In the 90's(in fact, since the crash in the 70's), and I assume now: We are in a wave of decline. There will be a mass of layoffs and such. Our tasks according to Mandel therefore do not include revolution. The workers need jobs in order to hold the bourgeoisie hostage after all so we need to fight for employment and other nice things. So yeah, from you perspective within the marsh, everything looks like fail to you. The moment you reject the non-marxist theories of Mandel you will be open to a whole new world of awesome. I hope to see you here one day. Comrade Mann Additionally but not Communism related. Why are you so lame? You must have some serious issues that you are projecting, constantly, onto me. Is there something you need to get off your chest? Some untold failure maybe? Maybe you have failed to rise to the occasion, and you no longer feel worthy? If so, It is okay, she is still into you!You are evil, Gracchvs. Just like Hello Kitty. Not lame... you don't get to be cool like FDR razz Or like Mann, eh. Except unlike FDR, his lameness isn't in the legs. Well, maybe one leg... It is nice of you to be so understanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:05 pm
Gracchvs Lady Merewyn Louis-Auguste Robespierre Comrade Mann Gracchvs why do your views fail so hard? This is a trick your location has played on your perception. See, you are a Mandelite who outright rejects Trotskyism. Even Mandel didn't. But then, he really doesn't matter at all does he? I mean, with the long-wave theory of capitalism what does he come up with? In the 60's: We are in a wave of growth. Because of this, the labour aristocracy can be bought off. Our tasks, according to Mandel therefore do not include revolution. The workers are just too well bribed to come over We need to 'radicalise them.' In the 90's(in fact, since the crash in the 70's), and I assume now: We are in a wave of decline. There will be a mass of layoffs and such. Our tasks according to Mandel therefore do not include revolution. The workers need jobs in order to hold the bourgeoisie hostage after all so we need to fight for employment and other nice things. So yeah, from you perspective within the marsh, everything looks like fail to you. The moment you reject the non-marxist theories of Mandel you will be open to a whole new world of awesome. I hope to see you here one day. Comrade Mann Additionally but not Communism related. Why are you so lame? You must have some serious issues that you are projecting, constantly, onto me. Is there something you need to get off your chest? Some untold failure maybe? Maybe you have failed to rise to the occasion, and you no longer feel worthy? If so, It is okay, she is still into you!You are evil, Gracchvs. Just like Hello Kitty. Not lame... you don't get to be cool like FDR razz Or like Mann, eh. Except unlike FDR, his lameness isn't in the legs. Well, maybe one leg... It is nice of you to be so understanding. If we accept your statement as true (even it is not, not by a long shot), then I have a simple question for you--how would you know? Is there something you aren't telling us? eek You can't have him. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
