|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 22, 2009 11:55 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 12:36 am
I still prefer the Steyr AUG. razz
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 12:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 1:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 1:56 pm
Yeah... Not my cup of tea. That's a really long gun, it looks quite uncomfortable.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 2:05 pm
Ok Deagle aside what's so bad about Israeli weapons?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 2:43 pm
I still prefer the QBZ 97.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 4:29 pm
I'm gonna shoot you in the back of the head.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 8:39 pm
Desert_Fox_Rommel Ok Deagle aside what's so bad about Israeli weapons? They're ********?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 3:12 pm
Fresnel Desert_Fox_Rommel Ok Deagle aside what's so bad about Israeli weapons? They're ******** class="clear"> I happen to like how the 941 looks, and the micro Galil doesn't look too bad.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 3:37 pm
Fresnel Desert_Fox_Rommel Ok Deagle aside what's so bad about Israeli weapons? They're ******** class="clear"> I've seen worse, and besides I meant performance wise.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 6:39 pm
I'm so sorry but WANT WANT WANT WANT WANT
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 8:51 pm
Desert_Fox_Rommel Fresnel Desert_Fox_Rommel Ok Deagle aside what's so bad about Israeli weapons? They're ******** class="clear"> I've seen worse, and besides I meant performance wise. Sure there's worse, but there's no brand that's CONSISTENTLY produced ******** guns so well as IWI. They're not so bad internally, for the most part, but DAMN is they ugleh.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 9:01 pm
I thought it was IMI. Israeli Military Industries. Anyway I don't think they look too bad. I might just be too easy to please but I think the galil is pretty good looking while guns like Nambu type 14 are ugly as sin.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 9:08 pm
Desert_Fox_Rommel I thought it was IMI. Israeli Military Industries. Anyway I don't think they look too bad. I might just be too easy to please but I think the galil is pretty good looking while guns like Nambu type 14 are ugly as sin. I forget what the difference is... maybe IWI (weapon industries) sells to civvies, and IMI sells to military. Either way, I don't like the looks of a single gun they've ever made, with the POSSIBLE exception of the UZI, but only because it's a classic. You have a point though... Japan had a lot of butt-ugly guns too. Maybe they tie.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|