|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 4:47 pm
Ok so I hope I can actually make a topic cause if I can here is the debate.
There are two major ways to play a good rpg.
Tabletop: Involves an imagination, luck with some dice and a small to large group of friends. Little to no physical activity whatsoever, & can be played at any time, pretty much anywhere.
Live-Action: Involves an imagination, some physical endurance and a large gathering of people; and a bit of money. Lots of physical activity, and ability to be outside for a weekend or more, but it costs more money and can only be played in certain locations, certain times of the year.
Ok so here is the starting question: Which do you consider better and why?
Also, if you need more info on either, I suggest asking or going to wikipedia or something.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 4:49 pm
I will be on both sides of the debate, as I participate and love both. So I am a netural party here. I am like Sweden, only with more goth clothing.
rofl ninja heart biggrin
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:39 pm
Well, if I could ever get up enough money. I shall be buying a cosplay suit. It shall be the captain's haori and shinigami uniform of squad 3. 
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:38 pm
I larp. It's pretty fun. We've been able to get areas around the year, though some people have been a bit scared of our games (we do World of Darkness). I've done tabletop too, but usually only to test things before throwing them in the larp.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 7:00 pm
I would have to say that tabletop is the best. Its like maybe your doing a fight sequence and someone gets hurt, but in tabletop you can hack and cut at eachother by imagination and no one gets hurt.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|