Hey. I'm new, but I figured it would be good to get involved early on, so I want to ask your opinion on something. I had an argument with someone a few days ago with someone about John Dillenger (I'm glad I don't have to go through the process of explaining who that guy is and what he has to do with Johnny!!!) about whether or not the guy was a so-called "good" criminal, as in a criminal that commits crimes for the good of the public and not just for personal gain (i.e., Robin Hood). What do you think???
I think that Dillenger was a "good" criminal, NOT saying that I approve of anything that he did, but just putting out the fact that he gave much of what he took from banks to the public and that he sympathized with civilians. Not to mention that Dillenger gained popularity with the general community for his generosity and humanity.
(sorry, do I sound uptight?
sweatdrop ? Haha. . . I get like that sometimes. .. . maybe I'm taking this Guild too seriously. . .
redface