|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 6:56 pm
Before we begin: a lot of people like to refer to the building that Jesus was born in as a manger, however, this is incorrect. The manger is the feedbox that he had to lay in, since obviously no one keeps their crib in a barn.
I helped build a barn today. It was pretty simple, and small, just a 2'x4' frame with some old boards nailed to it for a roof and walls and an open front so you can see the plastic light up Mary, Joseph, and baby Jesus inside. It looks pretty nice. The old wood makes it look rustic and stuff. And when it was done, and I sat there admiring our handiwork, I thought: Jesus, the Lord of lords, king of kings, God himself, was born in a barn. A barn! There was no room for the king of all creation in decent housing, so they turned him away and stuck him out back with the animals. There was no elaborate palace with many adoring nobles like other kings, just a simple, humble stable, with some shepherds to greet him. But in some strange way, it makes sense that Jesus was born in a barn. He is a lamb, after all, and you never see a lamb born in an inn. And his birthplace forshadows his whole life; it foretells how he would be turned away, and speaks of his humbleness and his insistance to do things according to the ways of God, not man.
This Christmas, let's continue to remember the lowly, humble stable, and the immense treasure that was born into it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 6:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:38 am
I wish I read this during Christmas. But I guess you can remember the birth of Jesus no matter what day of the year it is.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:47 am
Wasn't Jesus born in a house, then put in a manger?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 10:40 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:57 am
Luke says something about an "Inn," though it's a bad translation. It was supposed to be translated as "house" or something, but there's no mention of Jesus being born in a stable.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 3:16 pm
Spike Zantren Luke says something about an "Inn," though it's a bad translation. It was supposed to be translated as "house" or something, but there's no mention of Jesus being born in a stable.nooo Jesus was born in a stable
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 6:46 pm
Luke 2:1-7 1And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be taxed. 2(And this taxing was first made when Cyrenius was governor of Syria.) 3And all went to be taxed, every one into his own city. 4And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth, into Judaea, unto the city of David, which is called Bethlehem; (because he was of the house and lineage of David smile 5To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child. 6And so it was, that, while they were there, the days were accomplished that she should be delivered. 7And she brought forth her firstborn son, and wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger; because there was no room for them in the inn. No mention of exactly where in Bethlehem Jesus was born. So you really can't say that He was born in a manger, because it merely says that Mary put Him in a manger because there was no room in the Inn (house). We can't really say he was born IN a manger or stable, because the Bible doesn't say that.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 1:07 pm
Someone once told me that an 'INN' properly translated meant he went to one of Joseph's relatives house and that people usually lived on the first floor, leaving the ground floor as a stable for their animals.
But like i say, someone told me it so it might not be true but it doesn't sound out of the question.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 1:49 pm
nippa! Someone once told me that an 'INN' properly translated meant he went to one of Joseph's relatives house and that people usually lived on the first floor, leaving the ground floor as a stable for their animals. I think someone told me that too. But anyway, it doesn't really matter where He was born, it mattered what He did.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 2:28 pm
I've read that somewhere on the net. It makes sense, but it's discouraging when people act so dogmatic on something when it doesn't really mention it, such as people always calling the wise men the "Three Wise Men," even though the Bible doesn't number them. That's why I don't learn my doctrine from television and traditions.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 2:52 pm
Yeah, the Bible only numbers the gifts. And then there's the thing about the fourth wise man who got lost, which is a load of rubbish, because for all we know, there might have been four. And then, the wise men didn't even go to Jesus when He was at the stable, or inn or whatever. They found Him later, I think.
That's very wise, not learning your doctrine from TV or traditions.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 3:04 pm
I think they went to Jerusalem, then to Bethlehem. A trek that far on foot would take too long for them to be there right after the birth of Christ.
I advise every Christian to read the Bible for what it really says instead of believing everything you see on TV. There's plenty of snakes in the media who twist and distort the Bible to make it seem false. If you hear a verse on TV, check out your Bible and read it in context so you don't get misled.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 2:48 am
Although, it doesn't really matter. Whether He was born in a stable, an inn or even in a hot air balloon, He still died on a cross, and that's what matters.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 4:19 am
Voldemort point two ...He still died on a cross, and that's what matters. So did many Christian martyrs, but I'm not going to worship them. What matters is that Christ is the perfect, sinless Son of God who rose from the dead.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|