|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 10:25 am
Anyone need another character for your campaign.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 10:54 am
2nd!? holy crap thats old school! I don't even know how to play 2nd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 10:56 am
join my campaign, ECL 10 3.5 forgotten realms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 5:23 pm
2nd is way different then the rest and at first it was confusing but its not that bad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 9:05 am
i've read some stuff on 2nd edition, but never learned the rules. it seems interesting, but confusing. all these caps, and wierd backward variables...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 12:03 pm
ya the most confusing thing for me was the way they do the AC and check rolls which are opposite of 3rd and up. the lower you roll the better on checks and the lower your AC the better
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 12:12 pm
i think it was supposed to be a way of preventing anything getting better than a certain amount. so that 0 was the lowest, and therefore you couldn't be any harder to hit than that, and the lowest you could attack with is 0 so you couldn't hit any more accurate than the hardest to hit AC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 12:17 pm
ya but there were ways you could get a neg AC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 12:22 pm
you could break the 0 cap for AC to a max of -10. but you couldn't get -10 attack score without some kind of super epic items.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
geko87 rolled 1 20-sided dice:
19
Total: 19 (1-20)
|
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:06 pm
just trying to figure out how to use the dice roller
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
