|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 12:17 am
So I replaced it with a cute doggie instead. heart
But I still miss the old one. XD I was getting so many comments on it!
At the same time, I feel kind of proud that I had a signature worthy of being disabled. xd
Have you ever had your sig disabled before? What kind of rules did it break?
Mine was "inappropriate for younger viewers." D:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 12:22 am
I would like to request that you change the topic to "Disabled sigs," or "Sig graveyard." We will still discuss all of the things you propose, but I for one love that sig and it isn't showing anything that could be considered pornographic. I further request that you post it here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:49 am
Here is what was previously in my "inappropriate" sig.  I saved it and put it in my sig because she has a tummy. As some of you may have seen from my pictures, I'm not exactly thin, and while I wouldn't look this good in that outfit, the picture inspired me nonetheless. Thus, I was really happy that a lot of people liked it! And most of the ones who PM'd me about it or commented on it were from the GD, and you know how it can be there. :p
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:57 am
Little Rachael Here is what was previously in my "inappropriate" sig. I saved it and put it in my sig because she has a tummy. As some of you may have seen from my pictures, I'm not exactly thin, and while I wouldn't look this good in that outfit, the picture inspired me nonetheless. Thus, I was really happy that a lot of people liked it! And most of the ones who PM'd me about it or commented on it were from the GD, and you know how it can be there. :p I was among those that love it. Granted, your signature is posted everywhere, so it could be a problem, but in a little guild like this, I doubt that it will be cause for any sort of problem. My suggestion to you is that if you really like it as a sig, you should take it to photoshop and make the suit just a little bigger so that it covers just a touch more, and eliminate some of the crotch detail. If you like, you could use a cheaper program...Hell, if you're committed enough to spend an hour, you could even do a half-decent job in MS Paint. As for her being heavy-set, or even chubby, yes, she is. It's rather funny in my opinion. Anime is often degraded for idealizing women. She certainly deviates from that, aesthetically, but not in terms of idea. She is simply an idealized chubby woman. Sure, she has thicker limbs than most and indeed they even dared to draw a line that suggested a belly and supported it with shading at the navel to show depth. No girl that weighed what this girl probably does would look as good, though and the reason is one thing above all...Waist. Look how cinched and tiny her waist is, despite her body type...And breasts, while explicable are still generously proportioned to say the least. It may tell lies about women but granted it does beautify a body type that is often ignored or treated much less kindly. When I look at...materials with the express intent of arousal, however, I like a good bit of variety. I liked the build idealized or not but in any case, I am with you in finding this picture quite appealing. I have and still do like it quite a lot. And that is a very cute dog.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 3:50 am
You see, I noticed your sig as well (and saved it, for the exact same reason you posted it up incidentally), and I think it's rather pretty. I agree, it is inspiring, not least because I look a little like that too (I wonder how many people will make that claim before this thread is out- but seriously, I'm a 32GG with a 25" waist, so I'm seeing the resemblance razz ).
Maybe I'm desensitized or whatever to porn and nudity and inappropriateness, but personally, I don't think that picture's any worse than... oh, Alruna's rose, to quote the first example that comes to mind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 4:04 am
Mistress Procellifer You see, I noticed your sig as well (and saved it, for the exact same reason you posted it up incidentally), and I think it's rather pretty. I agree, it is inspiring, not least because I look a little like that too (I wonder how many people will make that claim before this thread is out- but seriously, I'm a 32GG with a 25" waist, so I'm seeing the resemblance razz ). Maybe I'm desensitized or whatever to porn and nudity and inappropriateness, but personally, I don't think that picture's any worse than... oh, Alruna's rose, to quote the first example that comes to mind. But she is a succubus. They are literally made for sex and therefor it makes sense to cater as strongly as possible to male fantasies and idealizations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 4:22 am
Matasoga But she is a succubus. They are literally made for sex and therefor it makes sense to cater as strongly as possible to male fantasies and idealizations. It's more about the picture itself, because in my opinion it's hypocritical of Gaia to ban that signature and yet promote the Alruna's rose item at the same time. They're both equally sexualized- perhaps Alruna's rose more so, as she's intended to be a succubus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:24 am
Mistress Procellifer Matasoga But she is a succubus. They are literally made for sex and therefor it makes sense to cater as strongly as possible to male fantasies and idealizations. It's more about the picture itself, because in my opinion it's hypocritical of Gaia to ban that signature and yet promote the Alruna's rose item at the same time. They're both equally sexualized- perhaps Alruna's rose more so, as she's intended to be a succubus. Oh, Alruna far more so, but anyone that thinks Gaia is fair, arbitrary, or objective clearly hasn't been on it for very long.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 11:54 am
Matasoga As for her being heavy-set, or even chubby, yes, she is. It's rather funny in my opinion. Anime is often degraded for idealizing women. She certainly deviates from that, aesthetically, but not in terms of idea. She is simply an idealized chubby woman. Sure, she has thicker limbs than most and indeed they even dared to draw a line that suggested a belly and supported it with shading at the navel to show depth. No girl that weighed what this girl probably does would look as good, though and the reason is one thing above all...Waist. Look how cinched and tiny her waist is, despite her body type...And breasts, while explicable are still generously proportioned to say the least. It may tell lies about women but granted it does beautify a body type that is often ignored or treated much less kindly. When I look at...materials with the express intent of arousal, however, I like a good bit of variety. I liked the build idealized or not but in any case, I am with you in finding this picture quite appealing. I have and still do like it quite a lot. Now, I would have to disagree, Josh. I've met women with a comparable body shape as her. xD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 12:07 pm
Sweet Lovely Death Matasoga As for her being heavy-set, or even chubby, yes, she is. It's rather funny in my opinion. Anime is often degraded for idealizing women. She certainly deviates from that, aesthetically, but not in terms of idea. She is simply an idealized chubby woman. Sure, she has thicker limbs than most and indeed they even dared to draw a line that suggested a belly and supported it with shading at the navel to show depth. No girl that weighed what this girl probably does would look as good, though and the reason is one thing above all...Waist. Look how cinched and tiny her waist is, despite her body type...And breasts, while explicable are still generously proportioned to say the least. It may tell lies about women but granted it does beautify a body type that is often ignored or treated much less kindly. When I look at...materials with the express intent of arousal, however, I like a good bit of variety. I liked the build idealized or not but in any case, I am with you in finding this picture quite appealing. I have and still do like it quite a lot. Now, I would have to disagree, Josh. I've met women with a comparable body shape as her. xD It's not an impossible body type, but rare in that it isn't quite a logical way for a woman to fill out, lovely as it may be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:49 pm
Matasoga I was among those that love it. Granted, your signature is posted everywhere, so it could be a problem, but in a little guild like this, I doubt that it will be cause for any sort of problem. My suggestion to you is that if you really like it as a sig, you should take it to photoshop and make the suit just a little bigger so that it covers just a touch more, and eliminate some of the crotch detail. If you like, you could use a cheaper program...Hell, if you're committed enough to spend an hour, you could even do a half-decent job in MS Paint. As for her being heavy-set, or even chubby, yes, she is. It's rather funny in my opinion. Anime is often degraded for idealizing women. She certainly deviates from that, aesthetically, but not in terms of idea. She is simply an idealized chubby woman. Sure, she has thicker limbs than most and indeed they even dared to draw a line that suggested a belly and supported it with shading at the navel to show depth. No girl that weighed what this girl probably does would look as good, though and the reason is one thing above all...Waist. Look how cinched and tiny her waist is, despite her body type...And breasts, while explicable are still generously proportioned to say the least. It may tell lies about women but granted it does beautify a body type that is often ignored or treated much less kindly. When I look at...materials with the express intent of arousal, however, I like a good bit of variety. I liked the build idealized or not but in any case, I am with you in finding this picture quite appealing. I have and still do like it quite a lot. And that is a very cute dog. I don't mind idealized women in anime or porn or whatever. It only really bothers me when people expect their sexual partner to be like the man/woman of their dreams. It's one thing if they want their partner to be good-looking--most people do. But when I hear someone complaining because a woman's breasts aren't symmetrical, or a guy has a bit of a gut, I feel kind of irritated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 11:54 pm
Little Rachael Matasoga I was among those that love it. Granted, your signature is posted everywhere, so it could be a problem, but in a little guild like this, I doubt that it will be cause for any sort of problem. My suggestion to you is that if you really like it as a sig, you should take it to photoshop and make the suit just a little bigger so that it covers just a touch more, and eliminate some of the crotch detail. If you like, you could use a cheaper program...Hell, if you're committed enough to spend an hour, you could even do a half-decent job in MS Paint. As for her being heavy-set, or even chubby, yes, she is. It's rather funny in my opinion. Anime is often degraded for idealizing women. She certainly deviates from that, aesthetically, but not in terms of idea. She is simply an idealized chubby woman. Sure, she has thicker limbs than most and indeed they even dared to draw a line that suggested a belly and supported it with shading at the navel to show depth. No girl that weighed what this girl probably does would look as good, though and the reason is one thing above all...Waist. Look how cinched and tiny her waist is, despite her body type...And breasts, while explicable are still generously proportioned to say the least. It may tell lies about women but granted it does beautify a body type that is often ignored or treated much less kindly. When I look at...materials with the express intent of arousal, however, I like a good bit of variety. I liked the build idealized or not but in any case, I am with you in finding this picture quite appealing. I have and still do like it quite a lot. And that is a very cute dog. I don't mind idealized women in anime or porn or whatever. It only really bothers me when people expect their sexual partner to be like the man/woman of their dreams. It's one thing if they want their partner to be good-looking--most people do. But when I hear someone complaining because a woman's breasts aren't symmetrical, or a guy has a bit of a gut, I feel kind of irritated. I've never heard people complaining that their partner isn't picture perfect. It seems like a lot of people I know like some of the quirks their partner has, actually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:57 pm
The only time my siggy ever got disabled was when I put lyrics from an Adam Lambert song in them...
That was forever ago though....
And again! I'm surprised this thread doesn't have more replies..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
