|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:28 am
Recently one of my threads was deleted. Whatever.
My point is, pro-lifers, why should we go out of our way to be nice, cordial, and civil with pro-choicers when it's rare that they do it with us?
This board notwithstanding, even though there are few on here that fit the above description (not naming any names), why do we have to take the high road?
Now, it might sound like I'm whining because I like to be mean. I'm not: I know in real life you have to do that because life is one big compromise and it's the measure of a man (and woman) to, you know, not stoop down to people's level.
But this ain't real life, and that's not the situation.
I don't know everyone here beyond correspondence on the boards, but I'd assume everyone has their hearts in the right place. We all convey our message with subtle differences, but I say we stop taking such a collectively compromising tone and be honest about how we feel. We can't win every argument trying to out-mature the other side, and I'd say most of the pro-choicers see us all as one-in-the-same, regardless if it's me and my angry nonsense, or some of you others who try to be nice, or mature, or intelligent, or articulate, or any of that s**t.
To them, we all taste the same (ew). So why bother bridling ourselves? They sure as hell don't do it for us.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:43 am
I think you've generalized way too much.
There was a time I felt like you. Now I don't. Now there is not "They" as you have said. There is "All of them who fit the title," but they all act quite differently towards me.
For that reason alone, I cannot agree with you. If you're nice to me, I will be nice to you. That much I firmly believe and I have reason to act nicely to a few prominent ones.
EDIT:
Furthermore, the lockeroom mentality will kill any attempt at intellectualism. Fast.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:43 am
Why bother saying that one of your threads was deleted? Unless it's because it got real nasty between lifers and choicers, it has no relevance. There is not some great pro-choice conspiracy against your threads.
I expect people to be passionate about their views. I know I am. The only thing I dislike about debating is when I think people are being deliberately pigheaded or aren't considering their views. It's something that annoys me about religion a lot - people just don't question enough. I'm aware that most of the lifers here have put a lot of thought into their views, so it doesn't bother me. I might still think they're wrong, but I've put a lot of thought into my views too and with every single scrap of information I know I think about them more and more. I wish my side were nicer, because being nasty just reinforces the angry feminist stereotype. I used to get angry more than I do now. I try to view every point as valid. I know it's not an easy thing for people to do. Pro-choicers don't have a monopoly on nastiness any more than pro-lifers have a monopoly on niceness.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:17 am
kp is dcvi I think you've generalized way too much. There was a time I felt like you. Now I don't. Now there is not "They" as you have said. There is "All of them who fit the title," but they all act quite differently towards me. For that reason alone, I cannot agree with you. If you're nice to me, I will be nice to you. That much I firmly believe and I have reason to act nicely to a few prominent ones. EDIT: Furthermore, the lockeroom mentality will kill any attempt at intellectualism. Fast. Who is "they all", kp? How do they "treat" you differently? And I don't think I've generalized "too much", at all. I've seen and been around this debate (especially on here) enough to know, it really really doesn't matter. You're pro-life, so you're pretty much everything I am, to them. This is, of course, speaking in extremes. Nicely telling pro-choicers that abortion is wrong, unfortunately, comes across the same way as meanly telling them abortion is wrong. I don't see why we should be nice about it, if we don't want to be, if it's nothing to solve anything. I'm not proposing this guild become a locker room, but I don't believe pro-lifers should parse their views on abortion and pro-choicers because they're afraid of looking unintelligent. I just think we've wound up circling the block with this entire debate.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:19 am
Again you direct your thread at Pro-Lifers. Why even post this in the PC/PL subforum? You're not talking to Pro-Choicers, you're not interested in what Pro-Choicers have to say. If you posted this in the main forum, it would make much more sense.
As far as the content of your post, Fran Salaska's right. It getting deleted had nothing to do with nasty Pro-Choicers. And as for being nice, well, before I even go into the real reasons to be nice, there's the "Be Civil" rule. If you want a guild to go and be nasty to Pro-Choicers in, make your own. You won't get many Pro-Choice joiners.
Real reasons? This may not be "real life," but everyone here is still a human being. Everyone here has feelings just like any Pro-Lifer. Do you like it when Pro-Choicers treat us like that? Because I don't. It's why I don't go to the abortion debate thread. I don't like to deal with Pro-Choicers who aren't going to change their opinion no matter what is said, and are going to reply to every comment with viciousness and bile. It makes me physically ill to take part in that kind of debate.
We're not compromising either, by the way. You can be honest about how you feel. As long as you're not a d**k. Your last thread wasn't deleted because it was honest. It wasn't deleted because the Pro-Choice mod didn't like it. It was deleted because it had no purpose other than to get Pro-Choicers mad. There was no relevant point to the debate.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:22 am
BeautifulDick I've seen and been around this debate (especially on here) enough to know, it really really doesn't matter. You're pro-life, so you're pretty much everything I am, to them. This is, of course, speaking in extremes. Nicely telling pro-choicers that abortion is wrong, unfortunately, comes across the same way as meanly telling them abortion is wrong. I don't see why we should be nice about it, if we don't want to be, if it's nothing to solve anything. ...If being nice has the same effect as being mean, why be mean? You know what, though, there is a different effect. No, you're not likely to turn a Pro-Choicer either way. But if you're mean, you make an enemy. If you're nice, you'll find that some of these Pro-Choicers are actual human beings and can be friends. Quote: I'm not proposing this guild become a locker room, but I don't believe pro-lifers should parse their views on abortion and pro-choicers because they're afraid of looking unintelligent. I just think we've wound up circling the block with this entire debate. ...Seriously, there's a main subforum, where "parsing your views" on Pro-Choicers is fine. Why do you have to do it in here?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:24 am
Fran Salaska Why bother saying that one of your threads was deleted? Unless it's because it got real nasty between lifers and choicers, it has no relevance. There is not some great pro-choice conspiracy against your threads. Did I say it was? Where did I say that? Quote: I expect people to be passionate about their views. I know I am. The only thing I dislike about debating is when I think people are being deliberately pigheaded or aren't considering their views. It's something that annoys me about religion a lot - people just don't question enough. I'm aware that most of the lifers here have put a lot of thought into their views, so it doesn't bother me. I might still think they're wrong, but I've put a lot of thought into my views too and with every single scrap of information I know I think about them more and more. I wish my side were nicer, because being nasty just reinforces the angry feminist stereotype. I used to get angry more than I do now. I try to view every point as valid. I know it's not an easy thing for people to do. Pro-choicers don't have a monopoly on nastiness any more than pro-lifers have a monopoly on niceness. Pro-choicers don't have a monopoly on nastiness, but they are complicit in those on their side who are, whereas I can't say that for us. At least, not always At least, on Gaia.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:55 am
In here, at least, no one is forced to be nice, but everyone is required to "Be Civil". Just about anything on this SubForum that is deleted or changed by Mods is done for violation of the "Be Civil" rule.
Personally, I try to be as nice as I can, because I don't like being mean. When I am mean to people, I feel bad about it later. I don't like feeling bad, so I try to be nice to people. And, often, one finds that being nice to people often encourages them to be nicer to others as well. I like holding the door for people, I try to smile and say, "please" and "thank you". I try to be nice to people in general, because I hope that I help other people have just a little bit nicer day.
When it comes to debating I don't try to be nice, but I do try to be open minded, understanding, and not tread on others feet. I attempt to remain civil and logical if at all possible. And I try to admit when I am wrong, or when someone has changed my views about something. I have found that this allows me to learn so very much about things I didn't understand before. In fact, this approach allowed me to learn so much about this very issue, and led to the opening of this very SubForum.
Now I appreciate that you have made an effort to address your point in a way that conforms to the rules of this SubForum. I think that shows a great effort on your part. But I would like to echo I.Am in questioning why you chose to bring this up in the SubForum but only addressed your post to Pro-Lifers? You would certainly get a much larger response from Pro-Lifers had you posted this in the Main Pro-Life Guild Forum, since not everyone chooses to come in here. I can only assume that you also wanted Pro-Choicers to respond.
As a Pro-Choicer, I certainly appreciate it when Pro-Lifers are nice to me. I try to be nice to them, and respectful even though we don't agree on this issue. I know that there are certainly people on the Pro-Choice side of this issue who don't want to be nice about it. It is such an emotional issue that it isn't easy to be nice, or even civil about it.
Personally, I think that making the effort to be civil (and, for me, to be nice) is worth it. It allows me to debate and discuss an issue that I care deeply about (and many other issues) without it degrading into childish name calling.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:57 am
@Fran: He mentioned his deleted thread because of the reason it was deleted. There was no reason to his last thread, other than starting s**t. So, under the "Be civil" rule, it was deleted.
So he mentions it as the catalyst for creating this thread.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 3:43 pm
Because we don't want to look bad and seem like we are all just crazy. If we are mean, it will just hurt ourside.
If we were rude and keep making generalisations then they are going to think that all pro-lifers are like that and they would keep making generalisations back. Basically we would get nowhere.
You like it when pro-choicers are nice and civil to you, right? As Waters said, they like it when we are nice to them.
I found that people listen to and respect you more when you don't bash their side or be rude. Don't have to agree and you still need facts but debates are much more fun and go more smoothly when people are civil to one other. If you are angry or frustrated, then I suggest you take a break and try to cool down.
I hate it when people are rude to me, it makes it seem like they are negative and not wanting to bother to debate.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:41 pm
BeautifulDick kp is dcvi I think you've generalized way too much. There was a time I felt like you. Now I don't. Now there is not "They" as you have said. There is "All of them who fit the title," but they all act quite differently towards me. For that reason alone, I cannot agree with you. If you're nice to me, I will be nice to you. That much I firmly believe and I have reason to act nicely to a few prominent ones. EDIT: Furthermore, the lockeroom mentality will kill any attempt at intellectualism. Fast. Who is "they all", kp? How do they "treat" you differently? And I don't think I've generalized "too much", at all. I've seen and been around this debate (especially on here) enough to know, it really really doesn't matter. You're pro-life, so you're pretty much everything I am, to them. This is, of course, speaking in extremes. Nicely telling pro-choicers that abortion is wrong, unfortunately, comes across the same way as meanly telling them abortion is wrong. I don't see why we should be nice about it, if we don't want to be, if it's nothing to solve anything. I'm not proposing this guild become a locker room, but I don't believe pro-lifers should parse their views on abortion and pro-choicers because they're afraid of looking unintelligent. I just think we've wound up circling the block with this entire debate. "They all" are those who do not treat me in the way that you are referring to. Pro-choice Individuals who are... nice. Who are pleasant. Or who are so far removed from emotion, they are about as factual as they come. Now, obviously, yes, people do get their emotions into this. They do make us out to be venonmous leeches on the bottom of their shoes. "They" being those that actually do treat us poorly. Am I going to snap at them? Hopefully not, but I have. But for what's it's forth; those that are nice to me don't deserve that same behavior. It's basic logic. If A, then B. I'm not going to be unkind to someone that simply doesn't deserive it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 9:39 pm
I.Am Again you direct your thread at Pro-Lifers. Why even post this in the PC/PL subforum? You're not talking to Pro-Choicers, you're not interested in what Pro-Choicers have to say. If you posted this in the main forum, it would make much more sense. I am interested in what they have to do say...which is why I posted it here. Quote: As far as the content of your post, Fran Salaska's right. It getting deleted had nothing to do with nasty Pro-Choicers. And as for being nice, well, before I even go into the real reasons to be nice, there's the "Be Civil" rule. If you want a guild to go and be nasty to Pro-Choicers in, make your own. You won't get many Pro-Choice joiners. One line of my post was about that post. You can "Be Civil" without rimming your dissenters. And I didn't say anything about being "nasty". I said why go out of our way to be nice and cordial, when they're not that way with us. There's no point. Quote: Real reasons? This may not be "real life," but everyone here is still a human being. Everyone here has feelings just like any Pro-Lifer. Do you like it when Pro-Choicers treat us like that? Because I don't. It's why I don't go to the abortion debate thread. I don't like to deal with Pro-Choicers who aren't going to change their opinion no matter what is said, and are going to reply to every comment with viciousness and bile. It makes me physically ill to take part in that kind of debate. I don't like it, but I'm over it. I don't get any brownie points for handling a*****e behavior well, so I will when I need to. Quote: We're not compromising either, by the way. You can be honest about how you feel. As long as you're not a d**k. Your last thread wasn't deleted because it was honest. It wasn't deleted because the Pro-Choice mod didn't like it. It was deleted because it had no purpose other than to get Pro-Choicers mad. There was no relevant point to the debate. I don't care why it was deleted. To be honest, I barely even remember what I said in it. I think a lot it is false compromise, because they don't do it with us, why do it with them? It might sound petty, but I do think we waste time compromising with people who don't want to compromise.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 9:40 pm
I.Am BeautifulDick I've seen and been around this debate (especially on here) enough to know, it really really doesn't matter. You're pro-life, so you're pretty much everything I am, to them. This is, of course, speaking in extremes. Nicely telling pro-choicers that abortion is wrong, unfortunately, comes across the same way as meanly telling them abortion is wrong. I don't see why we should be nice about it, if we don't want to be, if it's nothing to solve anything. ...If being nice has the same effect as being mean, why be mean? You know what, though, there is a different effect. No, you're not likely to turn a Pro-Choicer either way. But if you're mean, you make an enemy. If you're nice, you'll find that some of these Pro-Choicers are actual human beings and can be friends. I'm not saying be mean at the outset. If you go, "um, how about women start with abstaining from sex until a more advantageous occasion?" and they go "oh, so you're just pro-punishment! You're a misogynist! You just hate sex! We're not all sluts!" The appropriate response to that is, "uh, no dumbass. It's just you're the ones who want to avoid parenthood at all costs, and never creating a life is one way of doing that, and it costs less than an abortion, both in money and in lives lost." Perhaps you've shielded yourself from some of the realities of the people we're dealing with... THE FACT THAT YOU ARE PRO-LIFE MAKES YOU AN ENEMY. To many, not all. Quote: Quote: I'm not proposing this guild become a locker room, but I don't believe pro-lifers should parse their views on abortion and pro-choicers because they're afraid of looking unintelligent. I just think we've wound up circling the block with this entire debate. ...Seriously, there's a main subforum, where "parsing your views" on Pro-Choicers is fine. Why do you have to do it in here? Why are you so worried about maybe offending pro-choicers? I mean, damn. It's not like I've suggested spamming their Inbox with offensive crap. The PCG doesn't even have a section for us, and they usually take pride in insulting us. Here, you're afraid of them taking even the most mundane suggestion to heart. They're not the ones hurting for a voice here. We are.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 9:41 pm
WatersMoon110 As a Pro-Choicer, I certainly appreciate it when Pro-Lifers are nice to me. I try to be nice to them, and respectful even though we don't agree on this issue. I know that there are certainly people on the Pro-Choice side of this issue who don't want to be nice about it. It is such an emotional issue that it isn't easy to be nice, or even civil about it. Personally, I think that making the effort to be civil (and, for me, to be nice) is worth it. It allows me to debate and discuss an issue that I care deeply about (and many other issues) without it degrading into childish name calling. I get what you're saying, but I don't think we're talking about the same thing. When pro-choicers are nice, it just seems as though they're not douchebags about their opinions, and it's a refreshing change of pace. When we're "nice", we just seem like push-overs, or we compromise getting our point across because we're so worried about delivery. The problem is, to most of us, the pro-choice position isn't innately offensive. That IS NOT the case for many pro-choices when it comes to pro-life's positions. So when you're dealing with people who already find you offensive, they take advantage of your modesty. They just view you as an easier situation to assert control over. At least if you assert your own right to speak, you don't come away feeling like you've allowed them to run you and the debate. It's easy for that to happen (even if it's not always intentional) because of the ratio of pro-choicers to pro-lifers.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 9:42 pm
I.Am @Fran: He mentioned his deleted thread because of the reason it was deleted. There was no reason to his last thread, other than starting s**t. So, under the "Be civil" rule, it was deleted. So he mentions it as the catalyst for creating this thread. Kind of. I wasn't trying to "start s**t", and it's interesting you're talking about "Be Civil".
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|