|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 10:22 am
Many people say that the Big Bang is just a bunch of bull s**t when in reallity they know almost nothing about it.
Acording to the therory [or at least one version of it], the universe origonally exsisted in manny diffrent dimentions but was unstable so it just broke into smaller universes, our's being one of them. There are manny diffrent ideas as to what exacly happened but this one is more widely accepted.
Whether that version is correct or not doesn't matter much because raidio astronimers found the back-ground microwave radiation from the big bang itself, the equivilence of its "echo".
I belive the theory, and for the people who don't, there's no part of it that says God doesn't exist...
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:19 pm
Any one have any thing to say?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 6:02 am
i totally believe in the big bang xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 7:46 pm
I belive that god created the universe. I don't know about the big bang. It might have happened. It might have not. Either way, I like chili. And that's all this is really about right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 1:00 pm
The Big Bang Theory is just that. A theory. Whether to believe it or not is simply a question of whether or not it appeals to ones logic.
To clear it up, The Big Bang Theory states that, at the beginning of the universe, there was one, incredibly dense... force (for lack of a better term) that was what the universe was to become. This ball of force (approximately the size of an atom) contained all of the mass and energy in the universe. Those of you familiar with the theory of relativity know that, as it states, all forces in nature are related to one another. Light, gravity, mass, etc are all relative to one another. When the universe was in this state, all of these forces found themselves squeezed together into what seemed like one mass of force. When the universe begain to expand (or when these forces split from one another), mass, gravity, light, etc all became their own entity. After a few million years, hydrogen atoms began being formed (since the heat had previously prevented this from happening), and from there the universe slowly became what we know today (Which is a surprisingly small amount) 26 billion years later.
That's the theory in a nutshell. There is alot more to it than that, but I don't feel like explaining it. sweatdrop
Anyway, I believe this. Though, I also believe that, in order for it to be true, that time would have had to reversed itself (as a force of nature) just before the big bang. Considering the state of the universe at time 0, I severely doubt that the universe could have stayed that way for any longer than an infinitely small length of time. Essentiall at all. So, as the universe expands, it will eventually contract again (back to its original state) only to bounce out again. Though, since time is a force of nature also relative to all other forces, time would only repeat itself over again. But then that gets into my theory of how time works, so (for simplicity sake) I will leave it where I have it. If anyone has any questions, corrections, or anything else, let me know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 3:37 pm
Okken The Big Bang Theory is just that. A theory. Whether to believe it or not is simply a question of whether or not it appeals to ones logic. To clear it up, The Big Bang Theory states that, at the beginning of the universe, there was one, incredibly dense... force (for lack of a better term) that was what the universe was to become. This ball of force (approximately the size of an atom) contained all of the mass and energy in the universe. Those of you familiar with the theory of relativity know that, as it states, all forces in nature are related to one another. Light, gravity, mass, etc are all relative to one another. When the universe was in this state, all of these forces found themselves squeezed together into what seemed like one mass of force. When the universe begain to expand (or when these forces split from one another), mass, gravity, light, etc all became their own entity. After a few million years, hydrogen atoms began being formed (since the heat had previously prevented this from happening), and from there the universe slowly became what we know today (Which is a surprisingly small amount) 26 billion years later. That's the theory in a nutshell. There is alot more to it than that, but I don't feel like explaining it. sweatdrop Anyway, I believe this. Though, I also believe that, in order for it to be true, that time would have had to reversed itself (as a force of nature) just before the big bang. Considering the state of the universe at time 0, I severely doubt that the universe could have stayed that way for any longer than an infinitely small length of time. Essentiall at all. So, as the universe expands, it will eventually contract again (back to its original state) only to bounce out again. Though, since time is a force of nature also relative to all other forces, time would only repeat itself over again. But then that gets into my theory of how time works, so (for simplicity sake) I will leave it where I have it. If anyone has any questions, corrections, or anything else, let me know. You are very smart. It really all depends on what you believe and want to believe. If you don't want to believe in God, then you have a reason to think that the Big Bang Theory is true. And vice versa. Oh, but then you have to somehow prove it true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 9:11 am
mystikal_waters Okken The Big Bang Theory is just that. A theory. Whether to believe it or not is simply a question of whether or not it appeals to ones logic. To clear it up, The Big Bang Theory states that, at the beginning of the universe, there was one, incredibly dense... force (for lack of a better term) that was what the universe was to become. This ball of force (approximately the size of an atom) contained all of the mass and energy in the universe. Those of you familiar with the theory of relativity know that, as it states, all forces in nature are related to one another. Light, gravity, mass, etc are all relative to one another. When the universe was in this state, all of these forces found themselves squeezed together into what seemed like one mass of force. When the universe begain to expand (or when these forces split from one another), mass, gravity, light, etc all became their own entity. After a few million years, hydrogen atoms began being formed (since the heat had previously prevented this from happening), and from there the universe slowly became what we know today (Which is a surprisingly small amount) 26 billion years later. That's the theory in a nutshell. There is alot more to it than that, but I don't feel like explaining it. sweatdrop Anyway, I believe this. Though, I also believe that, in order for it to be true, that time would have had to reversed itself (as a force of nature) just before the big bang. Considering the state of the universe at time 0, I severely doubt that the universe could have stayed that way for any longer than an infinitely small length of time. Essentiall at all. So, as the universe expands, it will eventually contract again (back to its original state) only to bounce out again. Though, since time is a force of nature also relative to all other forces, time would only repeat itself over again. But then that gets into my theory of how time works, so (for simplicity sake) I will leave it where I have it. If anyone has any questions, corrections, or anything else, let me know. You are very smart. It really all depends on what you believe and want to believe. If you don't want to believe in God, then you have a reason to think that the Big Bang Theory is true. And vice versa. Oh, but then you have to somehow prove it true. belief in god and acceptance of big bang theory are not mutually exclusive. there are plenty of theistic scientists that do accept it. So, what evidence do we have for big bang theory? Large-scale homogeneity Hubble Diagram Abundances of light elements Existence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) Fluctuations in the CMBR Large-scale structure of the universe Age of stars Evolution of galaxies Time dilation in supernova brightness curves Tolman tests Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect Dark Matter Dark Energy Consistency and what evidence do we have for a god creating the universe? [end of list]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 10:02 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 2:43 pm
As the others have said, it's all a theory. Even if it is the best idea science has come up with yet, it's not set in stone.
As it is now, I believe it. Everything I've read about it seems to point further out that this is the most reliable theory, or the one I find most reliable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 6:15 pm
Zagachan As the others have said, it's all a theory. Even if it is the best idea science has come up with yet, it's not set in stone. As it is now, I believe it. Everything I've read about it seems to point further out that this is the most reliable theory, or the one I find most reliable. it seems like you don't understand what the word 'theory' means when used in a scientific context. in science, a theory isn't a guess or an idea that isn't to be taken seriously. theories are the ultimate goal in science and are the highest level of certainty besides math. to put it in perspective, here are some other things that are also theories: theory of gravitation theory of electricity atomic theory heliocentric model of the solar system germ theory of disease cell theory of life sex theory theory of tides to achieve the level of theory, it must be a comprehensive explanation for some natural phenomenon, be well supported by evidence, be in accordance with all the relevant facts while not being contradicted by any, be in accordance with the correspondence principle, make testable predictions, and be potentially falsifiable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 7:11 pm
God created the universe. What else would a Catholic like me say ? xD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:17 am
I believe god created the universe as others have said I see no problem with it, god creating the universe on the first day in Genesis could have been through the big bang, its a belief, the only thing I don't like about it and evolution and what not is it is taught in schools as a possibility but you aren't allowed to speak of religion, that is my only real issue with the idea, if your going to educate the masses ether side of the argument you have to as well teach them the counter argument or they will not be able to choose for themselves, and the same is for many Christian families.
Oh and I hate it when people say, "So where did god come from?" or "Where did the big bang come from?" We don't know, thats the beauty of humanity, the ability to say "I don't know" and the ability to explore the ideas, the fact that i can explain that we can explain things with such depth and intellectuality thought. Or the ability to put all your faith into a single thing, its amazing and fascinating.
(off topic)
that is why i want to be a psychologist, to study the inner workings of the human mind. To try to understand the idea of ignorance, of right and wrong, of faith, of choice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 12:57 pm
My Post Means No Offense to Anyone; It's Entirely my Opinion
Additionally, I'm Religiously Handicapped, so if I Miss Any Facts, Don't Blame Me
I agree with some posters before me; the Big Bang Theory is just a theory. I think it's like the theory of gravity. Even though everyone has accepted that gravity is some sort of unknown force that causes people to fall towards the earth, none of it is proven yet. No matter how many times scientists attempt to test or experiment anything, nothing is certain or absolute unless someone builds a time machine waaay back or talks with God, if someone like him exists.
I used to believe in the Big Bang theory, because I didn't scientifically believe that God existed. Although many people claim that they receive visions from God, it's not like we have anything to prove it with. (We don't have anything that can look into their minds and see if their claims are real.) I wrote a report about God before, and I remember: God is almighty and all knowing, forever benevolent. If God is almighty, then that means he can do whatever he wants; nothing is impossible for him. But God cannot create a wall so tall that he can't leap over; he can't create a boulder so heavy or strong that even he can't break or carry. Another point is that if he is so benevolent, why did he allow so many humans to be evil or go down the wrong path? If he has no control over people, then he either did not create us, he doesn't exist, he is not as benevolent as we think, or he is not almighty enough to control us. And if God exists, who created him?
It's the same thing for the Big Bang. If it created the universe, what created the Big Bang?
On the topic of God, I'm wondering why people chose God's appearance as it is. Who said he has to be male? Who said he opposes gays and Atheists? Heck, who said he's human?
Everything we believe are in actually, beliefs. Something that I believe is that nothing in this world is 100% correct, because everything I know is logic/common sense passed on and on and on. Mathematics and language aren't things that God or the Big Bang directly created (if they exist[ed]). They were ideas that people back then created and now, we study and learn them.
[Clears throat for dramatic closure]
The end.
xD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
