|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:25 am
Here we can talk about things.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:41 am
Icho Hirushima What about people who don't submit for the rounds? Should we just eliminate them? That would help too. I hate to do it, but it's not really fair to everyone else who HAS submitted for that round that they get to move on. yeah if you're talking about uchia, then just do it! he was a brat anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:23 pm
Alright than from now on if they don't submit they are out. gotcha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:58 pm
well if they have a valid exuse thats one thing but if they say " i was doing something else, or oops i was watching tv" then of coarse they're out but if you have to work the graveyard shift and have three kids at home with you sick grandfather staying at your house thates a noted exuse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 2:42 pm
okay so who is the top scores and who are the bottom scores as of so far?
we can ignore the topic i made for discussing this if you prefer to talk about it in here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:04 pm
So far for: Overall it's -Le Chien Chat- at 286 and for Round it's tied with -Le Chien Chat- and - S a r a L a n g - at 99
For bottom it's Nintendo Sixty Whore for lowest ROUND at 81 and for lowest overall it's tied with DanJF and ivy the pixie at 254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:34 pm
wel frankly we shouldent be judging on over all because thats just unfair, we judged the last rounds already so we dont need to judge them again, if nintendo sixty whore is the lowest this round then i supose she's out as for the tie who do you think deserves to win more?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:40 pm
okay i just realized after looking back we do not have enough information to decide who wins and who loses right now, theres a whole page of entrys that no one has added up, Since we have biz for some of the entrys and not dee this time i think we should count everyones votes. just to make it easier on everyone. we really dont have enough information to decide a winner though.
im doing like thirty seven things at once right now literally i have to finish three books in less then a week and do reports on all three and i really dont have alot of time for this s**t right now. so i'll be back later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:49 pm
Alright I can do that and I'll PM Dee and tell her to judge the contestants with ?? above them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:25 am
graycat185 wel frankly we shouldent be judging on over all because thats just unfair, we judged the last rounds already so we dont need to judge them again, if nintendo sixty whore is the lowest this round then i supose she's out as for the tie who do you think deserves to win more? It's unfaiir if we DON'T judge them overall though in the later rounds because one person could have done really good the last round but sucked on the next. It would be unfair to eliminate them just liek that. Especially if most of the time that person did better than the person who won that round or something. I dunno.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:29 am
HEIDee1-2-3 graycat185 wel frankly we shouldent be judging on over all because thats just unfair, we judged the last rounds already so we dont need to judge them again, if nintendo sixty whore is the lowest this round then i supose she's out as for the tie who do you think deserves to win more? It's unfaiir if we DON'T judge them overall though in the later rounds because one person could have done really good the last round but sucked on the next. It would be unfair to eliminate them just liek that. Especially if most of the time that person did better than the person who won that round or something. I dunno. thats why im saying we shouldent just say "khey you're out" and we shouldent go around the owners back and stab a few times either-_-" we should discuss things and decide "well this person did this... and we should give them on more chance because... i think the over all worst was...." but we cant be soft, and eliminating two diffrent people wont solve the problem it will just get rid of one more person that didint really lose. also why should someone who doesnt diserve to win, win anyway its too much
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:34 am
graycat185 HEIDee1-2-3 graycat185 wel frankly we shouldent be judging on over all because thats just unfair, we judged the last rounds already so we dont need to judge them again, if nintendo sixty whore is the lowest this round then i supose she's out as for the tie who do you think deserves to win more? It's unfaiir if we DON'T judge them overall though in the later rounds because one person could have done really good the last round but sucked on the next. It would be unfair to eliminate them just liek that. Especially if most of the time that person did better than the person who won that round or something. I dunno. thats why im saying we shouldent just say "khey you're out" and we shouldent go around the owners back and stab a few times either-_-" we should discuss things and decide "well this person did this... and we should give them on more chance because... i think the over all worst was...." but we cant be soft, and eliminating two diffrent people wont solve the problem it will just get rid of one more person that didint really lose. also why should someone who doesnt diserve to win, win anyway its too much Hmm. So how should we do it? (: Yeh. I know what you mean. Sorry. But uhm. xD I forgot what I was going to say... D:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:51 am
well welook at the highest and lowest scores for the ROUND and we discuss who's going to win and who's going to lose becuase you're right it sucks if someone who wont three rounds does one bad entry they shouldent be kicked out but we are not suposed to be friends with the contestants we need to be strict and fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:03 pm
graycat185 well welook at the highest and lowest scores for the ROUND and we discuss who's going to win and who's going to lose becuase you're right it sucks if someone who wont three rounds does one bad entry they shouldent be kicked out but we are not suposed to be friends with the contestants we need to be strict and fair Okay. that works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:47 pm
so who do you think should be the winner out of the higher scores? and who do you think should be the loser, then i'll post my opinion and we can discuss it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
