|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:27 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 7:02 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shelcombakasfire Vice Captain
|
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 2:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 4:32 pm
I don't like the man personally, because aside from the energy issue I hate everything he says.
However, on this one point, I couldn't agree more with him. It's possible to go off foreign oil- Norway is. WITHOUT using up their reserves, I might add. A combination of hydroelectric, geothermal, wind, and natural gas. Very little oil being used over here compared to the US, even when you consider that Norway's population is like... a fiftieth of America's.
However. I don't think wind energy is the only solution. America is too big for a single solution. Wind is the solution for central America. In other places it's solar. In others, hydroelectric and even geothermal (yeah, Hawaii, I'm looking at you).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 6:09 am
Bacillus Anthracis I don't like the man personally, because aside from the energy issue I hate everything he says. However, on this one point, I couldn't agree more with him. It's possible to go off foreign oil- Norway is. WITHOUT using up their reserves, I might add. A combination of hydroelectric, geothermal, wind, and natural gas. Very little oil being used over here compared to the US, even when you consider that Norway's population is like... a fiftieth of America's. However. I don't think wind energy is the only solution. America is too big for a single solution. Wind is the solution for central America. In other places it's solar. In others, hydroelectric and even geothermal (yeah, Hawaii, I'm looking at you). Wind energy wasn't his only solution...It's just his immediate solution. It's the thing he is trying to work on first. Working on one kind of renewable energy is much better than working on none.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 4:10 am
Bacillus Anthracis I don't like the man personally, because aside from the energy issue I hate everything he says. However, on this one point, I couldn't agree more with him. It's possible to go off foreign oil- Norway is. WITHOUT using up their reserves, I might add. A combination of hydroelectric, geothermal, wind, and natural gas. Very little oil being used over here compared to the US, even when you consider that Norway's population is like... a fiftieth of America's. However. I don't think wind energy is the only solution. America is too big for a single solution. Wind is the solution for central America. In other places it's solar. In others, hydroelectric and even geothermal (yeah, Hawaii, I'm looking at you). teehee xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 11:13 am
xsparklersx Bacillus Anthracis I don't like the man personally, because aside from the energy issue I hate everything he says. However, on this one point, I couldn't agree more with him. It's possible to go off foreign oil- Norway is. WITHOUT using up their reserves, I might add. A combination of hydroelectric, geothermal, wind, and natural gas. Very little oil being used over here compared to the US, even when you consider that Norway's population is like... a fiftieth of America's. However. I don't think wind energy is the only solution. America is too big for a single solution. Wind is the solution for central America. In other places it's solar. In others, hydroelectric and even geothermal (yeah, Hawaii, I'm looking at you). teehee xd Seriously. Because Hawaii is a volcanic area, the crust is especially thin. And that's where geothermal energy is most efficiently produced.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
