|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:11 pm
If your a girl under the age of 12 and your high on marijuana...
for or against gay marriage?
...don't ride your bike.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:55 am
For it. Love is love, no matter if you're the opposite sex or the same sex. People should marry for love, not because you're a girl and the other person is a guy, or vice versa.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:58 pm
Lets see....
The Right of a human to love another human does not have to mean that
they are of the opposite gender.
So.. by this.
A man and a man and a woman and a woman should have the right to marry one another.
yes , this coming from a straight person.
If only people could understand what others really felt.
some people will never get it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 12:12 pm
If your a girl under the age of 12 and your high on marijuana...
I know right?
...don't ride your bike.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 6:26 pm
OD_on_Sugar If your a girl under the age of 12 and your high on marijuana...I know right? ...don't ride your bike.
yeah.
i guess your right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 9:35 am
Obscure Raven Lets see....
The Right of a human to love another human does not have to mean that
they are of the opposite gender.
So.. by this.
A man and a man and a woman and a woman should have the right to marry one another.
yes , this coming from a straight person.
If only people could understand what others really felt.
some people will never get it.
Of that's the case, then why can't a 12 year old marry a 43 year old? If they love each other, then why not? What about an animal and a man. Isn't it the same? The saying is "love is love" after all.
For the record, I'm for it. Haha. I just figured this needs some actual controversy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dfsdfgr563453sddghuj5y3sa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 2:54 pm
[Appley Goodness] Obscure Raven Lets see....
The Right of a human to love another human does not have to mean that
they are of the opposite gender.
So.. by this.
A man and a man and a woman and a woman should have the right to marry one another.
yes , this coming from a straight person.
If only people could understand what others really felt.
some people will never get it.
Of that's the case, then why can't a 12 year old marry a 43 year old? If they love each other, then why not? What about an animal and a man. Isn't it the same? The saying is "love is love" after all.
For the record, I'm for it. Haha. I just figured this needs some actual controversy. Well appley.... Lets get 1 thing clear. If i actually wanted to type out the "whole" thing... it would take to long. oh and.. xDDD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 7:29 pm
1. Barring gay marriage privileges certain sects and religions over others. I do not see why the catholic Church should be favored over Reform Judaism or why Baptists should prevent unitarians and Quakers from having rights. Its a fundamental violation of freedom of religion. I do not grasp why two consenting adults should be barred from civil marriage or marriage within the religions that allow it. As no one is proposing forcing churches that don't agree with it to perform same sex marriages, I do not see why their objections should prevent others from doing it.
2. Disallowing gay marriage threatens families as it means that in some states visitation and custody rights can be denied a non-biological parent even if that parent raised those children in cases of death or divorce. this is deeply unfair to the non-biological parent and apt to be traumatic for the children. Imagine a small child forced to deal with the loss of two parents after the death of one.
3. Same sex marriage being allowed simplifies the law as regards transfolk. Currently, different states and even counties allow or bar marriage for transfolk seemingly at random. if same sex marriage is adopted the legal tangle disappears.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:08 pm
I'm against marriage... too many people nowadays sit there... and... don't HONOR THEIR PARTNER like they SHOULD... so... if you're over 18... will you be my concubine? I'm for gay concubines!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 8:01 am
for gay marriage
the rights that come along with it should be respected and there is no reason why they shouldnt be able to. morality is relative and changes from person to person so exacting one standard of morality as superior to others is rediculous.
i think that marriage as a whole is against our evolutionary instincts but i do plan on getting married (probably)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 5:22 am
For 3nodding
I don't see why people think it's 'against the sanctity of marriage' - marriage is about love and devotion, not which bits you've got.
A cheating partner is more of a threat to the 'sanctity of marriage' than two men or two women marrying. Why don't they go and outlaw that instead?
Note: I'm not saying that there should be jail terms for adulterers or some such, just trying to show how silly it is to say that gay marriage is 'against the sanctity of marriage'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 5:54 pm
 Dogs Are Angels...no offensive but im against it i dont think its right. but hey people can do what they want, its just that gays & lesbians take things to far, they want to make theirselves known in public by portesting or holding gay rights stuff, when helllooooo nobodys stopping gay people from doing daily stuff >_>
they have more rights then they think they do...With FUR!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 10:49 pm
But fewer rights than you have, which would be why they are protesting. Are you also angry about the protests to end Jim crow in the south in the 60's?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
