|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:08 am
What do you guys think about sequels to movies? And not like planned trilogies, but rather sequels after the fact.
This came to mind as my daughter is watching Peter Pan II: Return to Neverland. All in all its not a bad sequel
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:37 pm
If they aren't planned sequels. They sometimes stray from how the original story felt. But a lot of sequels are pretty good.
When it comes to a third movie tho.. well usually they try to hard to make it cool and it's lame compared to the first 2.
Blade 3? sucks lol
Spiderman 3? not as cool as the first 2.
etc
I don't know why they still make Saw movies. I only liked the 1st. 2nd was ok.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 11:18 am
J Lone Wolf If they aren't planned sequels. They sometimes stray from how the original story felt. But a lot of sequels are pretty good. When it comes to a third movie tho.. well usually they try to hard to make it cool and it's lame compared to the first 2. Blade 3? sucks lol Spiderman 3? not as cool as the first 2. etc I don't know why they still make Saw movies. I only liked the 1st. 2nd was ok. Nuuuuu wolfy, Blade 3 was better than the 2nd, but your right about Spiderman and I thought that Saw 3 was the perfect way to end the trilogy. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 5:09 pm
blastilicious machine J Lone Wolf If they aren't planned sequels. They sometimes stray from how the original story felt. But a lot of sequels are pretty good. When it comes to a third movie tho.. well usually they try to hard to make it cool and it's lame compared to the first 2. Blade 3? sucks lol Spiderman 3? not as cool as the first 2. etc I don't know why they still make Saw movies. I only liked the 1st. 2nd was ok. Nuuuuu wolfy, Blade 3 was better than the 2nd, but your right about Spiderman and I thought that Saw 3 was the perfect way to end the trilogy. 3nodding It was funnier but more cheesy XP Saw ended...until they made a 4th, and soon a 5th and 6th ((@(_@))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:09 pm
J Lone Wolf blastilicious machine J Lone Wolf If they aren't planned sequels. They sometimes stray from how the original story felt. But a lot of sequels are pretty good. When it comes to a third movie tho.. well usually they try to hard to make it cool and it's lame compared to the first 2. Blade 3? sucks lol Spiderman 3? not as cool as the first 2. etc I don't know why they still make Saw movies. I only liked the 1st. 2nd was ok. Nuuuuu wolfy, Blade 3 was better than the 2nd, but your right about Spiderman and I thought that Saw 3 was the perfect way to end the trilogy. 3nodding It was funnier but more cheesy XP Saw ended...until they made a 4th, and soon a 5th and 6th ((@(_@)) Oh my gosh, noooo that would kill it. gonk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 4:01 am
Oh it's dying!
I watched 4 the other night and was just like "uhh..ok"
5 is supposed to be out in October.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
