|
|
Do you have any morals? |
My morals are for the betterment of other people |
|
15% |
[ 7 ] |
My morals make me a better person |
|
67% |
[ 31 ] |
My morals dont really exsist... |
|
17% |
[ 8 ] |
|
Total Votes : 46 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 10:40 am
Has anyone else noticed that their are twelve year olds talking about "sex" and "drugs" like its no big deal at all.
The other day I went to the skate park and I saw like three 12 year old kids talking about how much "sex" they've had. It makes me sick.
Is it rare to find people with their virginity still in tact? Now in this generation, Its weird if you haven't had sex... But in my parents time, if people had sex before marriage, they were shunned.
What exactly is happening to change all of these morals, and values that people have, to almost nothing?
Why is it rare to find a 12 year old that just wants to learn? I don't know, which is why I'm asking y'all. what do y'all think?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:04 pm
I think if I answer your question, it will be byist because I am a young teenager that does still have her virginity. But I do know people [girls] who fool around with other people [boys] just for a reaction. No one I talk to has yet lost theirs though.
ninja But I am one of the only "cool" people in my school that actually has a plan to go to colledge. ninja
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:11 pm
I think the really imoralous persons are those idiots in the entertainment industry, who always wear the believer to outside, but sell their product with sex. Their usual words when they take awards are "I would like to thank my mom, my dad, and god!"
People who reach the masses have somekind of reliability, equal to what they do and what they say. It's something like one snowflake causing an avalanche.
My opinion is let them simply talk, especially when they are young, they know nothing and are influenced by that massmedia crap.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:49 pm
Nurge I think the really imoralous persons are those idiots in the entertainment industry, who always wear the believer to outside, but sell their product with sex. Their usual words when they take awards are "I would like to thank my mom, my dad, and god!" People who reach the masses have somekind of reliability, equal to what they do and what they say. It's something like one snowflake causing an avalanche. My opinion is let them simply talk, especially when they are young, they know nothing and are influenced by that massmedia crap. yes it is all thanks to the media, also anouther thing is this rap and hiphop crap emphizes drugs and sex, and the crowds love it. but the old style 70's rock type didnt do so as much
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 4:42 pm
dreams into nights yami Nurge I think the really imoralous persons are those idiots in the entertainment industry, who always wear the believer to outside, but sell their product with sex. Their usual words when they take awards are "I would like to thank my mom, my dad, and god!" People who reach the masses have somekind of reliability, equal to what they do and what they say. It's something like one snowflake causing an avalanche. My opinion is let them simply talk, especially when they are young, they know nothing and are influenced by that massmedia crap. yes it is all thanks to the media, also anouther thing is this rap and hiphop crap emphizes drugs and sex, and the crowds love it. but the old style 70's rock type didnt do so as much Another thing though... if we let children 'act' wont they start doing things as a cry for attention?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 5:05 pm
I feel this is something that is happening with each generation. Personal values and morals are fast escaping our teenagers in replacement of new trends and popularity.
Morals, family values and personal beliefs are no longer considered important, along with respect and dignity. It is a shame to see this happening as younger kids today see this behaviour as normal.
I do believe that morals have to be started in the home. My parents taught me about self respect and it is something I have always kept with my growing up and experiencing life.
Not until we are ready to have respect for older people do we discover respect for ourselves and those around us.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 5:51 pm
While I do dislike the gratuitous sex that is so often seen in the more popular movies these days, sex is a part of human life and thus I don't believe it should be completely screened from our culture. Sex, sexuality, and sensuality can be beautiful.
I think a lot of those kids who start doing that kind of thing at such young ages will end up not accomplishing anything, being unhappy, and probably not terribly intelligent (not that sex leads to stupidity, obviously, but rather the less intelligent among do tend to act less intelligently).
----------
However, I have to say that I don't think it's logical or wise to judge someone's morality or lack thereof based solely on whether or not they've had sex or their ideas about sex.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 11:34 pm
i think its amazing whenever i meet someone whos saving themselves for marriage. its so rare nowadays to find poeple who respect their bodies enough not to fritter them on meaningless unions. though i agree that senuality and sexuality can be beautiful, i think it should be saved for an eternal union between two people, not just a random hook-up you know? and as far as young'uns go...i'm a little disturbed. a survey at my middle school waaaaaaayyyy back in.....'02/'03 (i think, haha) said that almost half of the population there (6th, 7th, & 8th graders) had already had sex of some kind, wether it be penetrative or oral. it disturbed me then, and things have only gotten worse since. it makes me wonder what people are letting their kids watch/read/do. having a strong family unit with high morals is important to me, and in my family it has resulted in some very happy & successful virgins until marriage.
i've ranted a bit much huh?
nk(c-v)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 8:30 am
Personally, I feel the cause is a combination of things. For one, at least here in the US, we have become TOO SOFT. We aren't allowed to dicipline our children without fear of getting sued or arrested. One lady got arrested for slapping her son on the hand because he was trying to shoplift. Also, criminals are actually getting support from the justice system. One guy tried to break in to someone's house, fell through the roof, fell on a kitchen knife, sued the family he was trying to rob and won. Not to mention what happened with the two boarder guards who were persecuted for doing thier job, and the courts were willing to give full protection to the illegal immigrant/drug runner. Too much corruption, too much soft-heartedness, and too much sueing for the most rediculous of reasons. Also, many parents are not willing to take responsabilities for raising thier children, instead letting the TV become the babysitter. And then when thier kid does something wrong, they blame animes, music, video games, etc, instead of taking time to look at themselves.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 1:47 pm
dreams into nights yami Nurge I think the really imoralous persons are those idiots in the entertainment industry, who always wear the believer to outside, but sell their product with sex. Their usual words when they take awards are "I would like to thank my mom, my dad, and god!" People who reach the masses have somekind of reliability, equal to what they do and what they say. It's something like one snowflake causing an avalanche. My opinion is let them simply talk, especially when they are young, they know nothing and are influenced by that massmedia crap. yes it is all thanks to the media, also anouther thing is this rap and hiphop crap emphizes drugs and sex, and the crowds love it. but the old style 70's rock type didnt do so as much But the 70's rockstars weren't better, though. They took drugs and sang about ********, too. But they handled the sex topic more subversive and better metaphors, than the rappers do today. Also I wouldn't blame it all on the rappers, there are also a lot who rap about sex, but not in a relation with power. I just want to refer to Cypress Hills "What's your name" where they rap about a one night stand with a girl who got tricked with lies. There are still socially responsible musicians, especially those who appear immoralous are still leaving a point of truth to their lyrics. For example Al Jourgensen of Ministry was on heroine for a long time, maybe he doesn't sing about feelings and such things, but he has the guts as a musician to vent his anger about politics, he also closed the drug chapter of his life with the album "Dark side of the Spoon" signing a mark of morals in my eyes. There is still a "Kids, don't do drugs I know what I talk about"-message in my view on it. I respect such a thing, because it's hard for a musician not to get raped by major labels and go another way beyond the "mass compatibility", making the single artists fall into the deep pit like many others did.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 3:57 pm
dvn -camilla price-
ninja But I am one of the only "cool" people in my school that actually has a plan to go to colledge. ninja
no offense meant, i'm sure. but i'm eighteen and i lost my virginity at fifteen with every intent to do so. i'm currently about to graduate from college with my first degree and plan to go for my second, third and real estate license. i have no moral issues against sex, pre-marital or otherwise. i think it's a lovely, natural, human thing.
while i do think it's wrong for the younger generation who really haven't reached puberty, or have but don't fully understand the change, to be engaging in sex. i don't agree that we should be against sex like we are.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 9:06 pm
Taboo changes from generation to generation. Just think, the 60's were a major revolution for sex and drugs with free love and all (which didn't mean more sex...not to everyone, it was open to interpretation).
Essentially what happens is that the world changes, and people become more exposed to things that earlier generations wouldn't. A lot of this comes down to the media as well as parents. Media will show the most risque things that they can in order to attract more viewers, by showing things that we see as taboo that are changing, they really do a great job of this. And a lot of parents these days are too caught up in other things to really become involved in their children's lives and they don't take the time to make sure that their kids are making good decisions.
But morals have been seriously degraded as well as what people see as right or wrong. If you look at the degradation of things in the past 50 years, you can see how bad they'll be in another 50 years; it's just something that is inevitable.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 2:11 pm
Skizlersan Is it rare to find people with their virginity still in tact? Now in this generation, Its weird if you haven't had sex... But in my parents time, if people had sex before marriage, they were shunned. Yes, the good old days or so I've heard. When sex actually meant "I love you" instead of being used for entertainment.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 7:25 pm
I understand about these children they are too young, in my point of view, to even know of these things. I know puberty its a frustrating time in a person's life but we must controle ourselves. These children are not just controled by the media but older teens who only think of currupting the minds of the children. Note I say children for they have not reached puberty or their teenaged years yet. Face it, our world today is all about exploiting people it always has and always will unless we start to do something and I believe that D.A.R.E. doesn't do much. I think they reach kids at a too young of an age. They went to my school once I was in the fourth grade. I was nine for goodness sake.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 10:10 am
The problem with measuring morality is that it is fairly relative and mercurial.
300 years ago a woman who knew how to swim could be judged as an immoral witch and sentenced to death. 100 years ago it was immoral for White people to have sexual relationships with Black people. Some people think it is immoral to grant abortions, while others think it is immoral to take away a woman's right to chose for herself.
Who decides what is moral and what is immoral? Younger generations will always do some things differently than their parents did--it's part of social evolution--but that doesn't mean that the changes are bad, or wrong, or immoral. We don't hang witches, condone slavery, or treat women like babymaking house cleaners anymore. Does that mean our morals are devolving? Or is it just that morals change with the times?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|