|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:30 pm
I wanna hear your opinions!
Oh yeah, PRE-Fender-Takeover for Jackson.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 4:45 am
thats a close call because I'm in complete love with my (ESP) LTD DV8-R, but my dream guitar is a Jackson King Kelly. I can only afford a regualr kelly tho...I'll say ESP because Jackson needs to make a cheaper King Kelly and stop making so many bolt on neck guitars. Also Jackson you need to hook up with EMG or Seymore like ESP did and make those humbuckers stock. ESP and Jackson should just merge...that would be epic!
(forgive me Jackson...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 5:52 pm
jackson, hands down.
ehh ESP's just feel fake.
besides there are jacksons sold on the shelf that are prepared with duncans and or emgs. so yah. besides anything above $900 made by jackson has a neck thru.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 5:54 pm
I'll go with ESP. Jackson made some grand guitars but you can't overlook the fact that now they are far from amazeing. They need to recontinue their 7 - string modles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 9:12 pm
ESP
no contest.
ESPs looks good, jacksons look hideous, ESPs come with nicer pickups, even on their cheaper models they win big. Better hardware, too. ESP wins in every category - every desirable one anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 12:57 am
Gazlowe ESP no contest. ESPs looks good, jacksons look hideous, ESPs come with nicer pickups, even on their cheaper models they win big. Better hardware, too. ESP wins in every category - every desirable one anyway. oh ok, it looks nice it MUST be better lol rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 4:24 pm
osgood_schloter_boi Gazlowe ESP no contest. ESPs looks good, jacksons look hideous, ESPs come with nicer pickups, even on their cheaper models they win big. Better hardware, too. ESP wins in every category - every desirable one anyway. oh ok, it looks nice it MUST be better lol rofl yeah because thats totally the only thing i said stare stare i said nothing at all about the hardware and pickups being better as well as anything else desireable. better off listening to me than someone who cant read 2 lines of text to prevent making a fool of himself. rolleyes i take it you like jacksons, may i ask why you would possibly prefer a clearly inferior product? confused
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 4:35 pm
Gazlowe osgood_schloter_boi Gazlowe ESP no contest. ESPs looks good, jacksons look hideous, ESPs come with nicer pickups, even on their cheaper models they win big. Better hardware, too. ESP wins in every category - every desirable one anyway. oh ok, it looks nice it MUST be better lol rofl i take it you like jacksons, may i ask why you would possibly prefer a clearly inferior product? confused Probably for the same reason people like Line6. xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 10:35 pm
>.>
Ehhh, as I said, PRE FENDER Jacksons smile
though Fender did take over, the quality of the more expensive models
hasn't suffered, and their custom shop is still as amazing as ever.
ALSO, How can you not love a good Soloist?
It beats out alot of ESPs, besides, ESP is expensive as hell
(5,000+) for a basic custom guitar x.x
I do like both, and wouldnt mind an older ESP LTD V.
Just the
King V nostalgia, and my favorite guitar, the Kelly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 3:38 am
Is a basic custom Jackson any cheaper? or the same?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 12:57 am
Eh, The basic Custom shop models are like half the price.
What I mean is, the same thing with jackson, with the same quality is MUCH cheaper.
It's just that a lot of the top names in guitar have moved to ESP, making their label expensive, thus in turn, their guitars overpriced.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
