This list was done by
the_terrible on LJ, who is friends only but at least I'm giving them credit. Posted in the TMNT community.
Reasons the third movie is better than the second.1. The second movie has no real plot to speak of; merely a series of related events that either spend time explaining things or presenting fights, and hardly anything else. The third movie, at least, has an actual plot.
2. However contrived the humor in the third movie might be to some people, the ridiculousness of the second film is far worse and gets annoying very quickly. The Turtles goof around in both movies, but in the third they come across more like real teenagers while in the second film they come across as 3D toons.
3. The fight scenes in the second film are not very imaginatively choreographed and don't even allow the Turtles use of their weapons in most cases; the third film tries harder and presents fights that are more interesting to watch.
4. The second film essentially ruins the first film's ending by taking back the Shredder's death and turning him from a smart, tough crime boss into a one-track minded crime boss without much fighting ability. The third film gives us a new villain and an entirely different setting and at least makes an attempt to do something different.
5. The second movie has Vanilla Ice. The third does not. 'Nuff said.
6. I know not a lot of people agree with me on this one, but I stand by what I wrote before: the third film follows in the first film's footsteps by providing actual character development in addition to character history. The second film indulges itself in character history and what little character development IS there is forgotten rather quickly. Okay, Raph's words to Yoshi in the third film about controlling temper were a little surprising coming from him, but it shows that Raph has at least learned SOMETHING all this time... and keeping Raph doing nothing but blowing his top at everything makes him more two-dimensional than his interaction with Yoshi. Mikey is even given a chance to show an actual crush on a girl instead of just simply acting goofy like he does with April in the second film (and even in the first film to an extent). What teen can't relate to crushing on someone they can't have?
7. Yes, both movies have cheesy dialogue. But there are moments when the third film at least puts the cheesiness on hold long enough to advance the plot in a serious manner. The second film practically drowns itself here, favoring punchlines over sensible exchanges, and even trying to get away with the Shredder tolerating a prisoner talking back to him. The Shredder we saw in the first film wouldn't have put up with crap like that. Walker didn't put up with it either.
8. The third film is populated by better actors who give better performances. No, these actors are not given the same challenge that a drama's script would give, but then that wasn't the idea, was it?
9. The abundant circus music we hear in the second film is ditched by the third film in favor of a more atmospheric score. Music makes a difference, and it did here.