|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:27 am
just wanted to know what spec u guys preffer for pvp, on each class.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 6:26 pm
Well, as a warrior, i would say for me you would go a arms / fury hybrid. you need at least MS and flurry in order to do well. Armory Deathmoo if you wanna see my talents, im too lazy to go get it. blaugh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 10:51 am
Warrior - MS/Fury
Warlock SL/SL
Shaman: Resto [Chain heal pwns threes]
Druid: Resto - Hot healer
Paladin Reckadin!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:31 pm
fire....... for mage. fury for warrior.
those are the only chars ive ever really pvped with.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Walking Advertisement
|
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:56 pm
you do realize reckoning is not worth giving up crusader strike for, right? i play my shaman as 40/0/21, nothing exciting or different
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 7:19 pm
Kayariy fire....... for mage. fury for warrior. those are the only chars ive ever really pvped with....... did yueally just say fire for mages? for pvp, 17/0/44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:03 pm
Shaman = Elemental for 5v5 because the other specs are *yawn* in my opinion 2v2 and 3v3 you'll burn out on mana to really affect any cause.
For rogues all specs are fine, its just how you play. And despite what people say mutilate did not die with resiliance. People who say that just have crap for daggers use S2 and S3 daggers and you'll be fine.
For 2v2 and 5v5 on my lock I use *cough* FG spec. My 2v2 partner is a holy pally, best partner in my opinion. You get BoP and they bubble is immunity from damage for both of you. Blessing of sacrifice on the FG and the pally becomes immune to gouge, blind, sheep and any other CC that breaks on taking damage. Some time I switch to Sl/Sl or UA, because UA spec is much easier to beat rogues then any other spec.
For paladin I do 2v2 as ret with an enhance shammy, with such huge burst damage we almost always kill the healer right away. Its kinda funny. Unless its a pally healer then we force him to bubble then turn to his partner who almost always has justice judged on him so he cant run away.
Uhh... don't play hunters, why play a mage when you can be a lock, priests are meh, druids are boring and id ratherplay a rogue then a warrior.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 1:21 am
The Walking Advertisement you do realize reckoning is not worth giving up crusader strike for, right? i play my shaman as 40/0/21, nothing exciting or different
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 2:49 am
I've been PvPing forever on a hunter. I found the best is 41/11/9 But that's just what fit my play style the best. BM spec tends to burn down most classes fast. But I really think it depends on what you're good at.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:00 am
RivFador Kayariy fire....... for mage. fury for warrior. those are the only chars ive ever really pvped with....... did yueally just say fire for mages? for pvp, 17/0/44 i manage it with crazy luck. for some reason, no one ever, EVER attacks my mage, and i only ever really go to AV. I can stand on top of a cliff and pyroblast people all i want, and no one takes the very little time it would take to run up the cliff and kill me. when my luck goes away, i'll probably stop pvping (isn't really all that fun)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
