DangerSqueezit
Clinton has been "slamming" Obama, saying all he has is rhetoric and not solutions. I've been disappointed in the way he's handled this criticism. I guess I think he should dismiss it for the bullshit that it is--but instead he's tried to incorporate more of his plans as president into his speeches.
It also bothers me how the media has legitimized this. What the hell does Hillary say that's so much more substantive than what Obama says?
I think he's playing it too safe right now. I don't want to see him let the opposition set the tone for the race like the Bush campaign did in '04.
Anyway, I just wanted to see what everyone's opinion on this was.
Plain and simple: He's just being mature about this. Barrack is the type of guy who, even if it's the wrong attitude, will take critique and run with it. He's just simply playing her game -- and winning.
Persoanlly, I've always liked how non-schalaunt(sp?) his attitude was toward Hillary. Hillary always loses her cool when she gets angry or frustrated and then she often loses her point as well. Barrack, on the other hand, never really seems to lose his cool and always stays on track. No one's perfect, but he has a great temperament for being a president. 4laugh