|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:27 pm
I'm reading last night's ATA. According to Lanzer, there will be no Timmy update this week and today's special evolving update will not premiere any new evolving items. If that's the case, why make a special Tuesday update at all? confused
NB: Essentially today will be nothing but existing items update.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:33 pm
Well that depresses me. =(
By the way, what is ATA, and how can I find it?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:39 pm
perhaps Tama and Pora's lower-generations will evolve...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:39 pm
I think that Pora's other gens have already finished.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:42 pm
TheFourteenthMember I think that Pora's other gens have already finished. I don't think so... they've reached their final stage, but only the first-gen
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:45 pm
I thought that they evolved just like they normally would, they just wouldn't be mentioned. If you look at the Pora Fourth gen in the Marketplace, you can see all the forms. Yet, when you look at Tama's third gen, it only shows a couple forms. So I just assumed that Pora finished.
I could be wrong though. :p
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:46 pm
TheFourteenthMember I thought that they evolved just like they normally would, they just wouldn't be mentioned. If you look at the Pora Fourth gen in the Marketplace, you can see all the forms. Yet, when you look at Tama's third gen, it only shows a couple forms. So I just assumed that Pora finished. I could be wrong though. :p hrmm.... i must check this out... edit: Whoa. You're right... And saved me 20k on a pora! heart (Now i have several first gens, one second gen and a forth gen... Just gotta get a biancamella to get em all!)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:04 pm
Yeah.. i got no idea then.... maybe Lanzer was lying..?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:05 pm
You're very welcome.
Would Lanzer lie? It doesn't seem right, but who knows?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:10 pm
maybe by no new evolving items he meant that they weren't going to release any new eggs, not that there won't be a new form from an existing one.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:13 pm
TheFourteenthMember Well that depresses me. =( By the way, what is ATA, and how can I find it? "Ask The Admin." It's a weekly (Mondays at 9pm EST; 6pm PST) sticky in the GCD held by Lanzer and a bunch of devs. Like the title suggests, it's basically a Q+A with them. And yeah: former generations of evolving items don't get announced. So whenever there's an evolving item update, check your older gen items anyway.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:16 pm
Kotura maybe by no new evolving items he meant that they weren't going to release any new eggs, not that there won't be a new form from an existing one. Oh, yeah, that's exactly it. But if there's no Timmy update or new ones premiering, my questions is why bother making a special Tuesday update at all? confused
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:22 pm
Slanzer Kotura maybe by no new evolving items he meant that they weren't going to release any new eggs, not that there won't be a new form from an existing one. Oh, yeah, that's exactly it. But if there's no Timmy update or new ones premiering, my questions is why bother making a special Tuesday update at all? confused I dunno... it's that 'special' that has everybody suspicious... MAYBE DR.SINGH WILL START TO EVOLVE!! Timmy did bite her awhile ago.. >>
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:23 pm
Maybe because they wanted to watch us speculate for about a week.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:24 pm
TheFourteenthMember You're very welcome. Would Lanzer lie? It doesn't seem right, but who knows? He may be trying to keep it a seeeecccccreeeeetttt
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|