|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:04 pm
So, today in my mail, I recieved this: Lluvia Maya Hello, Your avatar has been resaved, as it was saved with glitches that affected the base avatar. Please try to avoid to keep avatars with glitched avatars that for example removes a limb from the avatar or removes the basic underwear from the avatar. This is the third time it's been resaved by a Mod, you've had 2 previous requests to stop saving your avatar with glitches. This is now a formal warning. If you do it again, you will be banned for 3 days. Thank you, - Lluvia Maya, Gaia Moderator Bah. D< I like being headless. Why must you do this Gaia? It's great and all you don't like glitches, but they happen. Hell, I could go right now and redo the headless glitch. I don't want a 3 day ban though. Ugh. I just wanted to rant. -3-; /wrist Lluvia Maya's the same person who banned [NPC] Shoy. .3. I just don't like her.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 7:08 pm
gonk heart I loved that avatar.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 7:29 pm
They never did that when I was using the ghost space helmet glitch, and I went to Ask the Admin for golly's sake. I guess they have it out for you? D: <3
I liked the headless avatar.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 7:41 pm
The headless avatar was meh... but your headless avatar art was awesome. xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:22 pm
Wait... if you got resaved twice already... why would you keep doing it? Stupid question... but srsly
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:30 pm
A picture speaks a thousand words...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:59 pm
I liked you being headless... It meant I didn't have to see your face... but NOW!... gonk
ILU SHOY!!! Almost more than Monkey does talk2hand
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:58 am
Why's she such a b***h?
I've seen her before, using her godly mod powers to like. Piss people off. I miss your av. ]:
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 6:20 am
That rule is so stupid D: I dont get the point of it. Maybe if you entered it in the arena I could see why its not allowed. And I get why the nakkie glitch isnt allowed. But as for being invisible or missing limbs...I REALLY dont get whats wrong with that D:
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:27 pm
Isn't there supposed to be a bad side to this glitch? Or is it not allowed just because it's not right? Why is it banned again...? question
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:49 pm
MonJ Redux Isn't there supposed to be a bad side to this glitch? Or is it not allowed just because it's not right? Why is it banned again...? question No real downside to it honestly. They just don't like it because it's classifed as a glitch. I find it silly cause it's not like I'm bypassing security to do it, or even using it for gain. I'm just finding a new way to equip things on my avatar that produce a result I like. Glitch or not. @ Meru - Because I like it? If wearing raven hair was a bannable offense, would you still do it?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 6:02 pm
K I N G S H O Y MonJ Redux Isn't there supposed to be a bad side to this glitch? Or is it not allowed just because it's not right? Why is it banned again...? question No real downside to it honestly. They just don't like it because it's classifed as a glitch. I find it silly cause it's not like I'm bypassing security to do it, or even using it for gain. I'm just finding a new way to equip things on my avatar that produce a result I like. Glitch or not. @ Meru - Because I like it? If wearing raven hair was a bannable offense, would you still do it? No because I like my account tyvm, which is the same reason you aren't gonna do it again. I was just wondering why, after getting it resaved twice before, you would still do it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:22 pm
Merumiharu K I N G S H O Y MonJ Redux Isn't there supposed to be a bad side to this glitch? Or is it not allowed just because it's not right? Why is it banned again...? question No real downside to it honestly. They just don't like it because it's classifed as a glitch. I find it silly cause it's not like I'm bypassing security to do it, or even using it for gain. I'm just finding a new way to equip things on my avatar that produce a result I like. Glitch or not. @ Meru - Because I like it? If wearing raven hair was a bannable offense, would you still do it? No because I like my account tyvm, which is the same reason you aren't gonna do it again. I was just wondering why, after getting it resaved twice before, you would still do it. I didn't think that Glitched avatars were a bannable offense. I wouldn't mind being resaved every few days only to set it back up. But a ban is just a little too far imo. Meh. That's just me. If every time I did it, they only resaved my avatar, I could live with that. *shrug* I thought that's all they'd ever do.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:59 pm
the headlessness was cool. O:
but i think sib put it best. there really isn't much you can do. D:
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 8:48 pm
Shoy,
It's a shame that they won't let you have the avatar like that, but really you shouldn't expect anything else. You are breaking the rules and you know it. It's to be expected that consequences would escalate.
Yuki ~
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|