|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:54 am
I am referring to the movie entitled "The Longest Most Meaningless Movie in the World", which by the way lives up to it's name.
The movie was released in 1970 and it runs 2880 minutes!! O__o Can you believe that?! I was forced into a huge bet for $100.00 to watch this movie with a friend and see who quit first, me and the other contestant and witness' all decided to burn the movie and order pizza before we gouged our eyes out with forks.
Apparently, the length of this movie is only surpassed by one called "Insomnia" released in the 1980's who's runtime exceeded 84 hours!!!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:55 am
In case any of you are wondering, we got less than 45 minutes into the movie before quitting!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:26 pm
Holy freaking cow.... eek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:21 pm
If I could do something else, like work online or draw while watching it (and take breaks for sleeping, ect) Then I could probably do it. But one sitting just watching. I'd never make it. I wanted to crack my skull open watching Alexander in the theater. Also a long horribly dull movie. (Though the sets and costumes where impressive and Angelina Jolie wasn't bad, creepy, but the charachter was supposed to be creepy so...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:38 am
pay me enough and I'd do it...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:52 pm
And that is my second response to that too... heh heh. I won't do it for less than a thousand...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:39 pm
Money makes people do things.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:08 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time-traveling Marshmallow
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:56 pm
whoa. so who won the bet?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:06 pm
I'd fall asleep. That's just way too much time for a pointless movie
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 4:14 pm
It is...But again, if the price is right ( and I can cover my end of it! ) I'd do it. ^^;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:36 pm
My attention span is way too short. I get bored through normal-length movies half the time. I suppose, if it was a seriously EXCELLENT movie that held my interest, I might be able to sit through it. But, chances are, that'd just be way too much time sitting around. My ADD wouldn't agree with it. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:32 pm
My husband wouldn't be able to sit through that movie either. He's got ADHD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
