Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply Pro-Choice Gaians
"Women and Children"

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Grip of Death

PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2004 7:05 pm


"What the heck is THIS topic about, Grip?", you say. Well, read on, for I will connect it to the abortion debate in a minute... or maybe an hour! xp Enjoy my musings.

I'm sure all of you have heard the phrase "women and children" somewhere before. "All women and children aboard the lifeboats!" "Women and children this and that".

Aahh Language, a very powerful device that provokes thought, but doesn't neccessarily define thought.

The importance of the phrase "Women and children" in my mind is that two entities are inseperable. Women are in conjunction with children.

I see baby changing stations in women's restrooms (dunno if they have them in men's rooms). I see an internet christian women's sub-forum where they... mostly discuss about their children. And so on...

"Women and children." Because this phrase implies a togetherness of two seperate entities, it also implies that women have qualities JUST LIKE CHILDREN. Most unfortunately, many of these qualities are dysfunctional towards women. Women are weak, women are silly, women are weak-willed and weak-minded. Women need to be protected. Women need to be sheltered. Need I go on?

...And there are beliefs about how women are "natural mothers". As you'll learn in a social-science textbook, that is actually a myth. Parenting is a skill that needs to be developed- ask any parent. Just because a woman has the capacity to give birth.. does not make her a "natural mother!"

It's not stigmatised if a man does not like children. Women, however, who do not "like" children, or just acts distantly to them, are very stigmatised. It's almost as if a woman is perceived to be demonic, or a cold-hearted ice-queen, or other explosively hateful perceptions. She is also perceived as being flat-out unloving. Especially, these women are classified as unfeminine. Truly, it's all too easy to misunderstand a woman who is not *completely* into children.

But besides from denying women a full identity, splicing women and children as one entity supports women's slavery. Lets take a look of some different forms of constraints a woman is under by being expected to like, and take care of children~

Economic slavery- A stay-at-home mother does not make a wage, but rather is completely dependent on her husband for substance. Also, a woman who tends to her child while keeping a career is going to have a harder time climbing up the corperate ladder, or be successful at her job. We need not even mention that a woman who sacrifices her career to be a stay-at-home mom... for the kids.

Physical slavery- a stay-at-home mother is usually bound at the home doing the housework, an underappricated, underacknowledged, repetitive, non-paying job. A woman who juggles career and children are more stressed. Career moms can be highly constrained by time.

Mental slavery- the stay-at-home mother, being bound at the house, and doing work that's repetitive and underappriciated probably experiences boredom. Especially since she does not make wages, she relies on her husband to validate spending money for recreational excursians. But also, she lacks a strong, official union of likeminded stay-at-home-moms. This indicates that she lacks the power of organization to challenge her subordinated position. Also, I see cases of mothers who live their identity through their children because there is nothing else substantial the woman could find to develop herself more through (to note, the children end up usually resenting that). The career-oriented mom probably feels guilt over what is more important in her life: Her husband, friends, and the media all point fingers to her for being "irresponsible" for valuing her career, and blame for the kid's misdeeds generally fall on her.

Now am I saying that no woman should be a stay-at-home mom? Absolutely not. That is her choice if that's what makes her happy, although i'll also wish for the stay-at-home moms to be ensured of autonomy. Also, am I saying that woman who like children are to be comdemned? Absolutely not. I'm not here to condemn women who like children, but challenge the ideas that all women should do so. Like I stated earlier, it's the expectation from society that women should like children, and that women should take care of children put the woman under huge constraints. Her very identity, like I said earlier, is put into question.

"Okey Dokey Grip. I actually took the time to read all this stuff, and my eyes are getting tired. Hurry up and tell me what this has to do with the abortion debate!" xd GOTCHA~!

- Being tied to children, through identity, and through living, also ties up a woman's freedom.

- also, the double-standard that men do not have to like children can justify some men to absolve being tied up to children. While this may be conducive to allowing a woman a full decision over the fetus during a pregnancy (well, at least for now, anyway)... she also isn't guarenteed of much help over child-care if a baby is born.

- Pressures are put on women not to abort, disregarding XX reason(s). The expectation to "like" children, plus to be identified with children, are beliefs which contribute to the pressure. The "munchkin" inside your body is a "part of you." "how could you abort something that's a part of YOU?" "Don't you like children? Then why are you killing it? That's YOUR baby!" "If you hate babies, then you must love killing them, you baby murderer!"
.
.
.
.
.
.
Anyway, one last thought, which is important to say yet a bit off topic: Children have different issues from women. It not only does women injustice to form the two together as one entity, but it does children considerable injustice too.

Anyway, Comments are welcome, as always, even if you want to b***h at me for always writing long, drawn out crap. wink I'm interested in your thoughts about women and children being forged as one group too.

Oh s**t, I also forgot the upside to child-rearing responsibilities xp : men of these current generations are interacting more with their children than they were in the previous generations. Go men! heart Still, much progress can be made. "Say... let's work together, shall we?" wink
PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2004 7:22 pm


Quote:
I see baby changing stations in women's restrooms (dunno if they have them in men's rooms). I see an internet christian women's sub-forum where they... mostly discuss about their children. And so on...


They do, just not everywhere.

Quote:
"Women and children." Because this phrase implies a togetherness of two seperate entities, it also implies that women have qualities JUST LIKE CHILDREN


Say it with me Grip...genetics...genetics blaugh

Quote:
Women are weak, women are silly, women are weak-willed and weak-minded. Women need to be protected. Women need to be sheltered. Need I go on?


Ok now you're being silly. This isn't the case, simply prejudice. A woman can be very strong in today's society.

It started though as a patriarchal society, and somewhat still is. But I will say this, women have also lessened themselves in someways. I mean you start having high schools who get dates to the Prom by shortening their skirt length.

I think with the introduction of condom and such (thanks alot Sanger...) we have everyday "casual" sex now, and people have turned this into now, if you will, a form of bribery. And let's face it, many men want it. So if a women has it. I think it's degrading how a women can put on something skanky and claim "it's her" when clearly, it's what he wants...

Quote:
...And there are beliefs about how women are "natural mothers". As you'll learn in a social-science textbook, that is actually a myth. Parenting is a skill that needs to be developed- ask any parent. Just because a woman has the capacity to give birth.. does not make her a "natural mother!"


They are. We all have natural parenting instincts, like did you ever notice it's hard to ignore a crying baby especially if no one is paying attention to it? People just need to shape their technique. We all have it, now it's made better on exp.

And the lovely stuff on the bottom.

Do you love your pro-choice views? Do you want your child to hear at least what you have to say? If you are not stay at home, more then likely, they and you will not have the time, and valuable family time is lost. You just lose that family aspect, that's why it's probably better to go partially impoverished then being totally dead silent around your kids because you've been working all day.

Ack this was the farthest thing from abortion so I figured I just give meh two cents.

DCVI


Grip of Death

PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2004 7:43 pm


my personal feelings about children~

I'm a gal who says "I don't care for children". I guess i'm either too afraid to say "I don't like kids", or "I hate kids", or that I feel the use of language is too strong to convey my feelings most accurately.

I still think I'm young, with a life ahead of me. I'm just 20, and I would like to complete college, pursue my identity, and develop a career. I just don't want a baby right now... or, can't envision one for a while. Heck, I can't even envision having a boyfriend for a while, muchless a kid!

With other people's children... I'm just uncomfortable. I'm afraid if I too closely interact with other's kids, I will accidently cause harm to the child (I think they're delicate). And my a** would get sued over that if it happened (in America, people love to sue at the drop of a handle, it seems). I'm afraid of having responsibility over children and do not feel I can handle it now. Also, I think small children are icky. All those germs, the drool, the dirt, the boogers, the stinky smells. xp

I don't really see babies as cute, they all look the same to me, lol. xp small children can be cute... but can also be ear-splittingly rambunctious.

I don't have much of a history of interacting with children, so it all feels quite awkward with me when I do interact with children. sweatdrop

However

I smile at children often. I try to be friendly, even if only on a distant level. I would like the world to seem like a friendlier place to the child.

I truly admire an infant's capability for awareness of their surroundings, rudimentary logic, and other aspects of intelligence. I think small children are more brighter than many humans think.

I believe that children are seperate entities from their parents, and should have rights. No, I'm not talking about fetuses, lol. I don't intend for children to overpower their own caretakers, but support children protection from abuse, having respect for thoughts and feelings, that kind of stuff.

I would be fiercly angry, if there was ever an understatement, if i see or hear of a child being abused. I'm such a sucker over a child's pain that my heart winces when I hear a "brat" wailing at the store over an unrequited request for a toy or candy... even though it's gratingly annoying too.

So... am I so heartless? ninja
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 1:27 pm


Good lord...my boyfriend expects me to support him. I'm not kidding. He jokes about it all the time but i'm starting to think that hes serious.
But I can see what you mean...its assumed that the woman will stay at home with the children but i'm assuming if the woman has a better career and makes more money it will more likely be the man who stays. Or like my parents...they both work. Life isn't cheap and usually both parents have to work.
I don't see how women have lessened themselves tho kp. Men can do the same....seriously men are slutty too. They just don't wear short skirts. They have other ways of trying to impress the female kind. *shrugs*
The condom did not make sex more casual. Its usually people who are not responsible who have casual meaningless sex and you don't need a condom for that. Casual sex would have happened..condom or not. Don't blam it on safe sex teaching...
Lets face it many women want sex too. I can leave a man high and dry just as much as a man can.

It all depends on how you were brought up...eventually women won't be seen as the weaker sex (i'm sure some people still think this) once its weeded out a few generations. Just like racism...althought i'm sure that will take longer.

High Princess Sioned


voxule

PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 1:41 pm


this is a bit off topic...but it has to do with the mother bit....it is possible for human males to produce milk 3nodding ...normally this is blocked by hormones...but when a couple has a child...the male can breastfeed eek they will start to produce milk just like females

I just thought that this would be a fun fact to share sweatdrop
PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 11:06 pm


okey dokey, it's been a long time since I've made this topic. It's probably not my brightest shining star. But here, I acknowledge an ideology. One that, commonly accepted, subjugate women. And possibly lead to a social unacceptance of abortion?

and Kp606, I am so sorry I haven't responded to you earlier. I could have swore that I had a rebuttal typed up and saved somewhere on my computer, it wasn't completely finished though. I'm scratching my head as to where it is, I may just have to write it up again! Don't fear though, for I plan on jumping back to this soon. And I appriciate your feedback- as well as the other posters feedbacks.

I'm just bringing up the topic now because of this- you don't even have to read the topic. One thing I'd really like to challenge in this topic is that pro-choicers hate kids, or don't have children, or don't take care of children. As well as seperate woman into her own entity, her own identity. Do ya'll have any stories to share?

BUMP~

Grip of Death


Nethilia

Liberal Member

3,450 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Person of Interest 200
PostPosted: Sat Jan 01, 2005 3:30 pm


Grip of Death


I'm just bringing up the topic now because of this- you don't even have to read the topic. One thing I'd really like to challenge in this topic is that pro-choicers hate kids, or don't have children, or don't take care of children. As well as seperate woman into her own entity, her own identity. Do ya'll have any stories to share?

BUMP~


I love children. I fawn over my nieces (both of them) and I fully expect to have children of my own one day. But I cannot afford them now, and my morals are such that it's either abortion or parenthood too early. Theses are not everyone's morals, and they should not be. I also know a great many people who don't like children, and they should not be forced into parenthood.
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 2:06 pm


And some of us would actually rather adopt than deal with childbirth. 3nodding

Epona Bride


Maverynthia

PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 7:40 am


Quote:
like did you ever notice it's hard to ignore a crying baby especially if no one is paying attention to it?


I don't think ANYONE can ignore a crying baby, men included. They are so annoying that I bet MOST people are secretly wishing someone shuts it up by any means neccassary.
PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:38 am


kp606


Do you love your pro-choice views? Do you want your child to hear at least what you have to say? If you are not stay at home, more then likely, they and you will not have the time, and valuable family time is lost. You just lose that family aspect, that's why it's probably better to go partially impoverished then being totally dead silent around your kids because you've been working all day.

Ack this was the farthest thing from abortion so I figured I just give meh two cents.


Um... no.

Careers do not negate strong families. Career or no, you still need to take the effort to make a strong family. Working (for either sex) is like many things, good in moderation. Both of my parents work, but they also took time to make sure we were a strong family . My brother and I were read to and sang to every night when we were children, and we always ate dinner together, and had family discussions, and my father taught me advanced math way before I learned it in school, we had scientific and mathematical discussions over dinner... We went places together. They took the time to explain the goings on of the time, like the gulf war, and tax law, and abortion (and why choice is important 3nodding ), and sex/alchohol...

And let me just say, that my mother is the only one of my parents who has had consistant employment for my entire life. If it wasn't for her, we'd be out of a house now. She makes so much more money than my father now. It's not his fault, there are a lot of factors, but being a working mother isn't something that is frivolous. And in any case, being "partially impoverished" wouldn't have helped anything, I can assure you.

On the charge of the deterioration of the "family aspect" careers are just scapegoats. Like GTA and the teen violence rate.

One word: Personal responsibility. It Works wonders.

And why is it, that women are the ones, who, in general, are automatically expected to surrender their dreams and ambitions to bear the cross of motherhood?

I need to find myself a nice house-husband...

cactuar tamer


~Silent-Owl~

PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 8:47 am


Grip of Death
okey dokey, it's been a long time since I've made this topic. It's probably not my brightest shining star. But here, I acknowledge an ideology. One that, commonly accepted, subjugate women. And possibly lead to a social unacceptance of abortion?

and Kp606, I am so sorry I haven't responded to you earlier. I could have swore that I had a rebuttal typed up and saved somewhere on my computer, it wasn't completely finished though. I'm scratching my head as to where it is, I may just have to write it up again! Don't fear though, for I plan on jumping back to this soon. And I appriciate your feedback- as well as the other posters feedbacks.

I'm just bringing up the topic now because of this- you don't even have to read the topic. One thing I'd really like to challenge in this topic is that pro-choicers hate kids, or don't have children, or don't take care of children. As well as seperate woman into her own entity, her own identity. Do ya'll have any stories to share?

BUMP~


I am young mother two, very happy I made my choice and I dont regret anything. I have always been pro-choice even before my little men entered my life. I have always wanted kids and loved being around kids, heck I thought of being a teacher at one point.

My boys are apart of me and I am still my own woman. Lucky for me, I have wonderful parents whom I love dearly and they love to take thier grandchildren from time to time and let me have some peace.

I am currently a stay at home mother, I stopped working to have my youngest and am trying to get back into the workforce (not easy in the winter time).

But I am not going to lie there are some times I feel overwhelmed by parenthood, but thats what friends and family are for to help keep you sane. No one said parenting was easy.

Being that my oldest is 3, I am finding the whole potty training thing difficult. But he is learning and so am I. I do whatever I can for them. Their needs come before mine or my fiancee's. Not just cuz, they are little and cant fend for themselves, but also because I love them dearly and they are the light at the end of a very dark tunnel.

So, You can be pro-choice and choose family. I did, but that doesnt mean everyone has to. Its a personal decision between the woman and her partner (if he cares).
PostPosted: Sat Jan 15, 2005 10:15 pm


Feminist...rage.....rising....at...conservatives...and...female oppression....

NightdollRavenwing

Reply
Pro-Choice Gaians

 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum