Welcome to Gaia! ::

The Gaian Driver

Back to Guilds

Gaia's first and most exclusive automotive enthusiast connection. 

Tags: Cars, Automobile, Racing, Race, Tuner 

Reply ▼ VEHICLE DISCUSSION & POLLS - Compare and discuss various vehicles.
SRT-4 Goto Page: 1 2 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

SRT-4?
  RICE.
  Those things are ********' OUT!
  Dude, it's a Neon.
  Steps on Z06.
View Results

cyberspectre
Captain

PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:18 am


What do you guys think of the SRT-4? I don't mean to bash or anything, and I know they can be relatively quick, but I think that too many people put them in the same league as the Evo or STi. I've taken two of them with ease in my Z. Plus, I think it's just plain ugly. Opinions?
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 11:03 pm


thats odd. the 0-60 is faster than a Z. remember, the heart of it is driven by a td04 mitsubishi turbo.

its a decent car. suspension is nicer than a lot of newer cars. front and rear swaybars....tuned f/r suspension.

and besides, its a 16valve 2.4l turbo... come on...

ive seen them RIP on porsches at the autocross here.

theres a red one that actually hangs with the Evos too.
i wouldnt put them on that level off the lot, but with some work yeah.

delSOLdier
Vice Captain


Zon Matsukai

PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 6:25 am


I like them and everything, but I'm perfectly happy not having to put premium in my car right now. >.<
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 8:13 pm


This wasn't 0-60, it was from 30-40 mph rolls to about 70. Is the motor also made by Mitsubishi or is it truly a Chrysler motor?

cyberspectre
Captain


mbdevelopments
Crew

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:43 am


chrysler block, mitsi turbo


although to be fair a LOT of imprezas come with Mitsi TD04's as standard so counts for nothing, the Hearse will have one fitted too from this saturday cool

they look ok, but it'd not a cool 4-banger
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:03 pm


they look stupid and should have been AWD
and lets not forget tha in general american companies dont no how to make four bangers and this is no exeption

soundkakashi


chaos.ultima.mage

Aged Gaian

PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 11:47 am


I personally like how they sound, as long as you don't do like some of the morons around where I live and put glass-packs on them. But, I'm not a fan of the look or anything...I mean, it's just a Neon with a body kit...

I haven't raced one, but I've wanted to. I can't imagine they're very fast stock.  
PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2008 5:53 pm


I don't like it. I would never buy one, it looks way too much like a neon. I don't care if it can out run a lambo. It looks worse than the PT cruiser. I wouldn't dare compare it to a Evo or STI. I would rather have an evo. I heard from edmunds.com that you can put a $1K cpu upgrade into an evo that will give it a 75 hp boost and gives it sharper quicker steering responce.

Onewing949


Ivan The Somekinda-Punk
Crew

PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:04 pm


Onewing949
I don't like it. I would never buy one, it looks way too much like a neon. .
That's cuz it is a Neon. An upgraded Neon that's trying way too hard to pretend it's not a Neon, BUT WE ******** KNOW IT'S A DAMN NEON!

Also, thanks for reminding me how much I hated my '97 Neon Sport from when I was 17-18.
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 6:24 am


A car's a car m8, just be thankful you have something to go to work/school in. Back in the day we rode our pushbikes to school or walked, rain or shine.

Janet Crash
Vice Captain

Shadow Spark

12,450 Points
  • Energy Harvester 150
  • Bitter Sandstorm 200
  • Mystical Adversary 25

fastdev

PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 6:04 pm


What my nephew did was put the frame, engine, and other stuff and put a 240sx body on it and we had a rear-wheel, rear engine, 240sx. I've seen him lay waste on some of your well known performance cars (one of my buddies stock GT-R for that matter) but of course we totally overhauled it we dynoed at about 523 horsepower.
PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 12:18 am


The more I read this bloke's old posts, the happier I feel that he'll probably never pass the driving test...

Janet Crash
Vice Captain

Shadow Spark

12,450 Points
  • Energy Harvester 150
  • Bitter Sandstorm 200
  • Mystical Adversary 25

Quakes21

PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 1:41 am


As for looks and stuff, the car doesn't look bad in my opinion. I mean even though its a Neon and theres no getting around that, its really not all that bad. I wouldn't mind having one, despite the fact thats its a Plymouth. Now when it comes to comparing them to Evo's and STi's I think it has a good chance, not stock, but it has potential. All a srt is, is like a cousin to a Eclipse GSX without the all wheel drive.
PostPosted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 2:30 pm


What everyone is forgetting that anything can be fast with enough money invested,case in point smartcars with hyabusa swaps in them.

but at the end of the day its still a neon xp

BoostedIntegra


cyberspectre
Captain

PostPosted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 5:59 pm


Quakes21
As for looks and stuff, the car doesn't look bad in my opinion. I mean even though its a Neon and theres no getting around that, its really not all that bad. I wouldn't mind having one, despite the fact thats its a Plymouth. Now when it comes to comparing them to Evo's and STi's I think it has a good chance, not stock, but it has potential. All a srt is, is like a cousin to a Eclipse GSX without the all wheel drive.


But the Eclipse GSX is much slower, isn't it? I know they're quick cars, but let's analyze the hierarchy.

Back in the day when they sold the Eclipse GSX, the next level up in the Mitsubishi line was the 3000GT VR4, which was, while much heavier, quicker because it has the 6G72 3.0 Turbo.

Now, the 3KGT, performance wise, is about identical to my car, stock for stock. So, if the Eclipse GSX and SRT4 are cousins, wouldn't that mean that the Eclipse GSX is just as fast as, if not faster than my car and the 3KGT?

I know that's not true. The GSX, back in '94, was tested by Motor Trend who clocked a 0-60 time of 6.6 seconds. Even if we seriously curve it and say it can do it in 6, it's much slower than a stock 350Z.

So, I don't think they're truly cousins... If that were true, then in theory, the GSX would be faster because it's a coupe, therefore lighter, plus it has AWD.

Also, Car & Driver tested the SRT-4 and clocked a 0-60 time of 5.6 seconds. They also tested the '03 350Z and clocked it at 5.4 seconds.

So... Doesn't that mean that stock for stock, the 350Z is faster? That'd explain my victories, especially considering mine's an '06 and not an '03.

I've gotta have someone clock my 0-60 times one of these days. The gauge cluster in my car includes a stopwatch, and I've tried to use that to clock it, but it's difficult to concentrate on getting the best time and having to stop the stopwatch at the same time. The last time I TRIED it, I left it in auto mode (obviously, because I want one hand on the wheel at least) and clocked a 5.8. Disappointing, but auto mode just sucks. It's so much quicker when you shift it yourself with the tiptronic - you gain a couple hundred RPM that way, plus harder shifts.

I'll have someone come with me for a ride with a stopwatch soon.
Reply
▼ VEHICLE DISCUSSION & POLLS - Compare and discuss various vehicles.

Goto Page: 1 2 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum