|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:25 pm
Alright, let's see if you people have what it takes to do long distance remote viewing. I've taken and object from my house and placed in my room. This object will be the object for viewing. In two days or so, I will end the test period and reveal what the target is so you WILL see what the target it later. If you can describe the object well I'll give you a 100 points. If you can describe one of the decoys well, I'll give 50 points. Depending on how distinctive the description is and accurate, I'll add on more points, up to 100 more. If anyone can get 100 points or more, I will give them 1000 gold as a reward for renewing my faith in the subject, for all of my recent tests have come out fruitless.There will be three decoys and I'm experienced enough in Remote Viewing to choose good targets.
For those who don't know what RV is or how to do it, here is a quick guide.
1. Calm yourself, don't think to much about what is going on, just the target that needs to be described and will be shown to you in the future. Most all areas of ESP can be used and are mixed together to make it work. Make sure you have something to write impressions on.
2. Whatever you do, do not dismiss descriptions. Most accurate descriptions flash in your head and leave as quickly as they come. If an impression comes up that seems very clear and prevalent, write it down and mark it as mental noise. It's rarely that clear and often doesn't fit.
3.Don't analyze things! just write down details that come to head. "It seems like a school bus" usually ends up a lot worse then "It's red and has a fair amount of curves." Your brain can't analyze while Remote Viewing it seems, which is why language is hard to perceive.
4. Don't worry about being wrong or right! It's better to just stay calm and try and write down what comes naturally to mind. Just being able to nail a fair portion of details nets you some good points.
Also,
If you feel like doing the same thing, go ahead. I enjoy remote viewing various things and seeing how close I can get. Just be sure that object has distinctive features.
Good luck to all trying to participate!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:39 am
k, for the decoy I got a blue plastic cup.
For the object it's like a ball, round, but not a ball. The round object is either pinkish or metallic in color.
And I think you have, or are trying the technique where you take a paper clip and a string and a cup, and tie the string to the paper clip, then tape the string ot the cup, and move the paper clip.
They're on top of something wooden, or paper, like a stack of books on a desk.
And I think your room has quite an array of items in it, doesn't it?
I'm trying to find things to prove all my faith wrong. Am I wrong? confused please tell me I'm wrong
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:56 am
Not much time,so I did a quick one(crap,now I am all dizzy...)
Decoy-Small mirror or something rectangular and reflective.
Object-I got some pyramid shaped object...Clear with a blue tint is what I picked up as far as color...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 11:00 am
If we're supposed to post in here...
I had just made guesses as to what I see when I think on it. My mind is occupied with something else though... so...
What I end up seeing when thinking on it is like a rubber ball that has multiple colors on it... and then a fox figurine.
I won't even try to say that I'm accurate to any extent... this isn't my field. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 2:31 pm
Alright, I don't believe you people get the idea of a decoy. The decoys are other objects placed to compare results to and make sure you can target the right thing. The decoy is not meant to be described purposely. When I said 50 points for describing the decoy, I meant if you describe it accidentally in place of the true object.
My bad. ^_^;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 2:35 pm
LoBo_23 And I think you have, or are trying the technique where you take a paper clip and a string and a cup, and tie the string to the paper clip, then tape the string ot the cup, and move the paper clip. please tell me I'm wrongNice try Lobo but your looking over what I posted in the skeptics forum and using that to increase your rating it seems. I actually don't have one, I just designed it off the top of my head.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 3:44 pm
because ive never done remote viewing before, this is pretty much just guessing and saying what pictures come to mind.
1.) an actionfigure or something like that ex. Barbie, G.I. Joe ect...
2.) a book/comic.
i dont know what order either goes in so... lol?
EDIT: damnit i looked over the post about not guessing the decoy... so ill change it to
1.) a book/comic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 3:49 pm
>.> i just read the bottom part of your post too... so ill do an object whilst im here. smile
ok, its leaning in front of my computer. the better the description the more (points?).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 8:37 pm
Im getting something long and curved inward it seems, with red somewhere on it. Something oval shaped, brown, flat on some part of the surface. Something like a barbie flashed in my head too, just the barbies head though.
Just some descriptions that came to mind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:31 pm
fluffysteel2 because ive never done remote viewing before, this is pretty much just guessing and saying what pictures come to mind. 1.) an actionfigure or something like that ex. Barbie, G.I. Joe ect... 2.) a book/comic. i dont know what order either goes in so... lol? EDIT: damnit i looked over the post about not guessing the decoy... so ill change it to 1.) a book/comic. Again, people make the same mistakes over and over again. Do not analyze. If you see clearly what the item is, it's most probobly or most definitely, WRONG. I hate to say it but people just don't have the ability at this point to pick up on things so clearly. Clear pictures, or mental noise, can be classified as your imagination. Feel free to try again if you'd like.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:50 pm
Pyrokin132 fluffysteel2 because ive never done remote viewing before, this is pretty much just guessing and saying what pictures come to mind. 1.) an actionfigure or something like that ex. Barbie, G.I. Joe ect... 2.) a book/comic. i dont know what order either goes in so... lol? EDIT: damnit i looked over the post about not guessing the decoy... so ill change it to 1.) a book/comic. Again, people make the same mistakes over and over again. Do not analyze. If you see clearly what the item is, it's most probobly or most definitely, WRONG. I hate to say it but people just don't have the ability at this point to pick up on things so clearly. Clear pictures, or mental noise, can be classified as your imagination. Feel free to try again if you'd like. but if we go about this as you tell us with just details then in short we ARE telling you what it is.... besides that you make it sound like a game of 20 questions.... und auch, i've never done any remote veiwing so i hope you werent expeting my answer to be anything remotely close. but i know its perfectly possible to be able to see something ex: my object or your object from a remote location without prior knowledge. i've researched into this alot recently. there are hundreds of cases that someone has a OBE and they see medicl procedures being done on them and things like the top of things hanging from the ceiling. some hospitals even have plates hanging from the roof that have something writen on teh top(the part virtualy un-veiwable from the floor). in any case theres also thousands of cases disprooven- but theres still the.... i dont rember what its called. it was some german testing room that they experimented in. the average hit rate was expected to be only 20% by chance, but when the tests were completed the hit rate was at 36%. then they made an auto (whatever its called) that did the same thing but without ANY chance of human mistake, and it scored 36% also. the testing involved two people-a sender and a receiver. the sender piced one picture/video out of 4 randomly selected images/clips. the sender then described openly the picture adn details and stuff. the receiver meaanwhile was in a diffrent room listening to white noise in a sondproof room. then the receiver had to desribe afterwords how he felt during the time and anything that came to mind. then s/he was asked to pic a picture out of the 4 that best describes the feelings/thoughts s/he had during the period of relaxation and listening to white noise. the hit rate by chance would have only been 20% but after testing hundreds of hundreds(?) of people it ended up being 36%. (?)-i don recal how many people it was but in know they tested groups of 100 people at a time over a period of years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:03 pm
fluffysteel2 Pyrokin132 fluffysteel2 because ive never done remote viewing before, this is pretty much just guessing and saying what pictures come to mind. 1.) an actionfigure or something like that ex. Barbie, G.I. Joe ect... 2.) a book/comic. i dont know what order either goes in so... lol? EDIT: damnit i looked over the post about not guessing the decoy... so ill change it to 1.) a book/comic. Again, people make the same mistakes over and over again. Do not analyze. If you see clearly what the item is, it's most probobly or most definitely, WRONG. I hate to say it but people just don't have the ability at this point to pick up on things so clearly. Clear pictures, or mental noise, can be classified as your imagination. Feel free to try again if you'd like. but if we go about this as you tell us with just details then in short we ARE telling you what it is.... besides that you make it sound like a game of 20 questions.... und auch, i've never done any remote veiwing so i hope you werent expeting my answer to be anything remotely close. but i know its perfectly possible to be able to see something ex: my object or your object from a remote location without prior knowledge. i've researched into this alot recently. there are hundreds of cases that someone has a OBE and they see medicl procedures being done on them and things like the top of things hanging from the ceiling. some hospitals even have plates hanging from the roof that have something writen on teh top(the part virtualy un-veiwable from the floor). in any case theres also thousands of cases disprooven- but theres still the.... i dont rember what its called. it was some german testing room that they experimented in. the average hit rate was expected to be only 20% by chance, but when the tests were completed the hit rate was at 36%. then they made an auto (whatever its called) that did the same thing but without ANY chance of human mistake, and it scored 36% also. the testing involved two people-a sender and a receiver. the sender piced one picture/video out of 4 randomly selected images/clips. the sender then described openly the picture adn details and stuff. the receiver meaanwhile was in a diffrent room listening to white noise in a sondproof room. then the receiver had to desribe afterwords how he felt during the time and anything that came to mind. then s/he was asked to pic a picture out of the 4 that best describes the feelings/thoughts s/he had during the period of relaxation and listening to white noise. the hit rate by chance would have only been 20% but after testing hundreds of hundreds(?) of people it ended up being 36%. (?)-i don recal how many people it was but in know they tested groups of 100 people at a time over a period of years. The white noise thing is Ganzfield. People were asked to describe a picture however, not identify. Responses would be something live, "has lots of greenery, plants and such. Perhaps trees. Some blue is also in there as well as a person. Not sure what they are doing, but there is a person there. It seems artificial though, the colors and shapes." instead of "It's a painting of a woman in the woods" The point is that you can't identify clearly a picture or place or something purposely using ESP. At least not without tons of training and practice. However, almost ALL people can remote view. I got a fair match on my first try, as have many people tested. ESP isn't as foreign as people make it out to be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:05 pm
a**l Jesus Im getting something long and curved inward it seems, with red somewhere on it. Something oval shaped, brown, flat on some part of the surface. Something like a barbie flashed in my head too, just the barbies head though. Just some descriptions that came to mind. Now though I can't reveal the answer or if your right or wrong, but I would like to point out that this is how an observation should look. Just details, not identification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:11 pm
Pyrokin132 a**l Jesus Im getting something long and curved inward it seems, with red somewhere on it. Something oval shaped, brown, flat on some part of the surface. Something like a barbie flashed in my head too, just the barbies head though. Just some descriptions that came to mind. Now though I can't reveal the answer or if your right or wrong, but I would like to point out that this is how an observation should look. Just details, not identification. >.< dam yoo!! emo you didnt read the friggin post did you.... crying you done hurt my feelings. arrow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:15 pm
fluffysteel2 Pyrokin132 a**l Jesus Im getting something long and curved inward it seems, with red somewhere on it. Something oval shaped, brown, flat on some part of the surface. Something like a barbie flashed in my head too, just the barbies head though. Just some descriptions that came to mind. Now though I can't reveal the answer or if your right or wrong, but I would like to point out that this is how an observation should look. Just details, not identification. >.< dam yoo!! emo you didnt read the friggin post did you.... crying you done hurt my feelings. arrow Uh, dude, look one post above it. >_<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
