Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply Ethics and Serious Debates
Illegal immigration in the U.S. Goto Page: 1 2 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

What should we do with the illegal immigrant situation?
  Ignore it
  Give them amnesty
  Deport them
  Put a lava or shark infested moat around the boarder XD
  Other
View Results

namida_no_chi

PostPosted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 7:21 am


I don't think this would really fit into any other thread, and I know its a very popular topic. Discuss your opinions on illegal immigration in the U.S. here. Do you think we should give the illegals here amnesty? Do you think we should just leave them alone? Do you think we should crack down, and deport every single one of them? And why?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 7:42 am


I personally think we should deport them because having so many undocumented people in the country is causing problems. It is causing problems with our health care systems when people do things like come here, run up a hefty medical bill, and then skip out without paying, causing insurance rates to rise to rediculous sums. We basically end up paying for some one else's medical treatment when some of us citizens cannot afford medical treatment ourselves.

It is bankrupting our Social security system when people who are not citizens and have never paid into that system, collect money that they do not deserve from it.

And I'd hate to bring up this cliche, but it is true: ALL illegal immigrants are criminals. Hens the first word in the term "illegal". But aside from that, I'm seeing that a lot of illegals are doing things like using other people's social security numbers to collect other people's money. And just today the thing I saw that inspired me to start this thread was an item on fox news about these two illegal immigrants in Texas for are now being granted a second hearing in a brutal rape/murder from several years ago. I have been seeing a lot of things about how illegal immigrants have been committing violent crimes (like rape and murder), and skipping out before they are arrested. Or, for example, this guy I was watching about on Fox news in New Jersey. I believe the details were that (and I could have the order mixed up here) he raped a 6 year old girl, been sent to prison, got out but didn't actually go back to Mexico (as he was supposed to, because he was an illegal from there. Although that is also INS's fault to some degree), and he ended up killing two more college girls.

I don't think we should allow so many people that we know nothing about into the country, or allow the ones that are here to stay. Because you end up with people that can commit crimes (like theft, which is what I would call the whole medical/social security issue, and violent crimes), and then don't have to deal with the consequences (leaving other people who are citizens to suffer), or that are free to commit another crime. These people have no right to be here because immigrating to this country is supposed to be a privledge, not a right. Since they are not U.S. citizens, they don't have the rights that U.S. citizens are granted by the constitution. And as often as I may disagree with our government, I will agree with them in the process that they have to allow immigrants into this country, so that we know who they are. When it comes right down to it, the illegal population is a burden on society. And for what reason? So businesses can exploit them for cheap labor, and stuff their own pockets?

namida_no_chi


Calypsophia

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:31 am


I'm divided on the subject.

on one hand, yes they are illegal just by dodging the system and coming in here sneakily. but it's not exactly easy to do it the right way. there is something like a 15 or 18 year waiting list to come in legally, and I feel for those in serious need of getting out of wherever they are. it can even take 10 years for asylum to be granted (which isnt the same thing really, but check it out..).

one example that's been in the news (time magazine) recently was a couple from the middle east... palestinian I think. they applied for asylum in 1996 and the american government allowed them entry while they waited for their application to be processed..... they waited 10 years. during that time, they've had 4 children. each year they'd have to get new work permits processed in order to legally hold down a job -and this process came with it's own hassles. so, 10 years later the american gov't comes back and DENIES the application, telling them since their children were born here one of them (the father)can stay here with the children, but the mother has to leave. why the mother and not the father, I dont know. but to me this is terribly *wrong*. they came in legally, did everything right no matter how difficult it was... it's not their fault it took our gov't 10 frikkin years to process an asylum application and they shouldnt be expected to just put their whole lives on hold in the interim.

I think people should come into this country legally and abide by our processes, but I also think our govt shouldnt make it so damn hard for them to do so. what pisses me off the most tho, are the illegal immigrants who come in here and take advantage of the fact that they got thru by proceeding to break our laws. we have enough criminals of our own, thank you. I have a friend who's ex bf was an illegal immigrant who would frequently drink and drive. he got busted once, went to court, they found he was illegal, but did they deport him? NO. *that* pisses me off.

it seems it's a damned if you do, damned if you dont type of situation. those who want to do it right, cant or get denied, and those who seek to beat the system get allowed to stay. wtf?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 8:43 am


Calypsophia
I'm divided on the subject.

on one hand, yes they are illegal just by dodging the system and coming in here sneakily. but it's not exactly easy to do it the right way. there is something like a 15 or 18 year waiting list to come in legally, and I feel for those in serious need of getting out of wherever they are. it can even take 10 years for asylum to be granted (which isnt the same thing really, but check it out..).

I understand what you mean, but at the same time, we're not obligated to let everyone who wants to come here (even by legal means) in. I'm not saying that our government is efficient in any way, but the fact remains that we don't have to let everyone in.

Calypsophia
one example that's been in the news (time magazine) recently was a couple from the middle east... palestinian I think. they applied for asylum in 1996 and the american government allowed them entry while they waited for their application to be processed..... they waited 10 years. during that time, they've had 4 children. each year they'd have to get new work permits processed in order to legally hold down a job -and this process came with it's own hassles. so, 10 years later the american gov't comes back and DENIES the application, telling them since their children were born here one of them (the father)can stay here with the children, but the mother has to leave. why the mother and not the father, I dont know. but to me this is terribly *wrong*. they came in legally, did everything right no matter how difficult it was... it's not their fault it took our gov't 10 frikkin years to process an asylum application and they shouldnt be expected to just put their whole lives on hold in the interim.

This is one of those instances where the government fails. They have the time to kick someone out who came here legally, but not enough time to kick out an illegal child molester who, as a result of their lack of actually escorting him out of the country, killed two girls. I'm not saying we don't need reform, but alas, there's something like 12 million illegal immigrants in the country right now, and we don't really know anything about any of them. We don't know when another of them will exploit us or turn around and kill someone. And they really have no right to be here. Like I said before, they're becoming a burden on society. I heard this thing on the news (I believe it was fox), a couple of months ago about how a woman (who I believe was an illegal) came into the emergency room somewhere in California bleeding, but because of illegals who have been coming in, running up bills and then skipping out on them (causing everyone else to pay for it), and the fact she had no health insurance, they refused her treatment, and let her bleed to death on the hospital floor. This whole thing is affecting EVERYONE in a negative way.

Calypsophia
I think people should come into this country legally and abide by our processes, but I also think our govt shouldnt make it so damn hard for them to do so. what pisses me off the most tho, are the illegal immigrants who come in here and take advantage of the fact that they got thru by proceeding to break our laws. we have enough criminals of our own, thank you. I have a friend who's ex bf was an illegal immigrant who would frequently drink and drive. he got busted once, went to court, they found he was illegal, but did they deport him? NO. *that* pisses me off.

Yes, but I think you'll find that this isn't the only area where the government is inefficient. I know from personal experience.

The same instance with that guy I told you about in NJ. Although he killed to people because INS failed to do their job.

Calypsophia
it seems it's a damned if you do, damned if you dont type of situation. those who want to do it right, cant or get denied, and those who seek to beat the system get allowed to stay. wtf?

Well I'm sure it does seem that way, but I do think the first thing we have to do is get some of the illegal immigrants out of the country, because they're causing serious problems. And like I said before, we are also not obligated to let everyone into the country, even if they do try to do it the legal way.

namida_no_chi


Calypsophia

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:49 am


namida_no_chi
Calypsophia
I'm divided on the subject.

on one hand, yes they are illegal just by dodging the system and coming in here sneakily. but it's not exactly easy to do it the right way. there is something like a 15 or 18 year waiting list to come in legally, and I feel for those in serious need of getting out of wherever they are. it can even take 10 years for asylum to be granted (which isnt the same thing really, but check it out..).

I understand what you mean, but at the same time, we're not obligated to let everyone who wants to come here (even by legal means) in. I'm not saying that our government is efficient in any way, but the fact remains that we don't have to let everyone in.[


well then, we need to remove the sonnet (“The New Colossus”) inscribed in bronze at the base of the Statue of Liberty that reads:

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land:
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost, to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

because it kinda insinuates that everyone is welcome.


But I wouldnt say we're obligated to let everyone in either. I would be against admitting someone with a criminal background, for example, but it shouldnt take 10 - 18 years to find out. I dont care how many applicants we have, nothing should take that long. hell, that's an entire lifetime for some.
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:32 am


Calypsophia
namida_no_chi
Calypsophia
I'm divided on the subject.

on one hand, yes they are illegal just by dodging the system and coming in here sneakily. but it's not exactly easy to do it the right way. there is something like a 15 or 18 year waiting list to come in legally, and I feel for those in serious need of getting out of wherever they are. it can even take 10 years for asylum to be granted (which isnt the same thing really, but check it out..).

I understand what you mean, but at the same time, we're not obligated to let everyone who wants to come here (even by legal means) in. I'm not saying that our government is efficient in any way, but the fact remains that we don't have to let everyone in.[


well then, we need to remove the sonnet (“The New Colossus”) inscribed in bronze at the base of the Statue of Liberty that reads:

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land:
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost, to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

because it kinda insinuates that everyone is welcome.


But I wouldnt say we're obligated to let everyone in either. I would be against admitting someone with a criminal background, for example, but it shouldnt take 10 - 18 years to find out. I dont care how many applicants we have, nothing should take that long. hell, that's an entire lifetime for some.

It isn't like what is inscribed on the statue of liberty is law. Heck, we don't even follow a lot of what is in our own constitution. For example, police can obtain a search warrant for your house on the basis of probable cause. But in the constitution, it says they have to have probable cause AND the swore testimony of 2 (I believe) witnesses. Not either or, AND. As you can see, this country is in need of reform on many other issues besides just illegal immigration. Plus you said it yourself that everyone is not welcome. I think I can assume that (based on what you said) you wouldn't like the idea of some foreign country emptying their prisons into our country, based on what the statue of liberty said.

But let me ask you, would you let 12,000,000 law-abiding, legally applied immigrants into the country? Even taking into consideration the burden that would become on our economic system by having all of these other people flocking into the country.

Think of it with the analogy of donating to a charity. It's nice to donate to a charity when you have the money. But it's not smart to send ALL of your money to a charity. If you do that, you don't even have the means to support yourself, but a few troubled or disadvantaged people will be able to better at your sacrifice. So then you become a charity case. Our government is obligated to take care of its own citizens before it starts worrying about people from other countries.

namida_no_chi


Calypsophia

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 7:30 am


namida_no_chi
Calypsophia
namida_no_chi
Calypsophia
I'm divided on the subject.

on one hand, yes they are illegal just by dodging the system and coming in here sneakily. but it's not exactly easy to do it the right way. there is something like a 15 or 18 year waiting list to come in legally, and I feel for those in serious need of getting out of wherever they are. it can even take 10 years for asylum to be granted (which isnt the same thing really, but check it out..).

I understand what you mean, but at the same time, we're not obligated to let everyone who wants to come here (even by legal means) in. I'm not saying that our government is efficient in any way, but the fact remains that we don't have to let everyone in.[


well then, we need to remove the sonnet (“The New Colossus”) inscribed in bronze at the base of the Statue of Liberty that reads:

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land:
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost, to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

because it kinda insinuates that everyone is welcome.


But I wouldnt say we're obligated to let everyone in either. I would be against admitting someone with a criminal background, for example, but it shouldnt take 10 - 18 years to find out. I dont care how many applicants we have, nothing should take that long. hell, that's an entire lifetime for some.

It isn't like what is inscribed on the statue of liberty is law. Heck, we don't even follow a lot of what is in our own constitution. For example, police can obtain a search warrant for your house on the basis of probable cause. But in the constitution, it says they have to have probable cause AND the swore testimony of 2 (I believe) witnesses. Not either or, AND. As you can see, this country is in need of reform on many other issues besides just illegal immigration. Plus you said it yourself that everyone is not welcome. I think I can assume that (based on what you said) you wouldn't like the idea of some foreign country emptying their prisons into our country, based on what the statue of liberty said.

But let me ask you, would you let 12,000,000 law-abiding, legally applied immigrants into the country? Even taking into consideration the burden that would become on our economic system by having all of these other people flocking into the country.

Think of it with the analogy of donating to a charity. It's nice to donate to a charity when you have the money. But it's not smart to send ALL of your money to a charity. If you do that, you don't even have the means to support yourself, but a few troubled or disadvantaged people will be able to better at your sacrifice. So then you become a charity case. Our government is obligated to take care of its own citizens before it starts worrying about people from other countries.


I didnt say it was law, all I said is it rather 'insinuates' that all are indeed welcome. why have it there if it's not what we truly believe? I agree there has to be some kind of limit.

as for your example with charities, if I had the money to give, I'd rather not actually give the money, but buy the items they need and send them that. blankets and first aid kits to the red cross, for example. I dont trust some charity organizations when it comes to money. I just dont have that extensive faith in people in general when it comes to money.

here's a question to pose: what if those we let in had to accept the jobs and places to live that the govt is willing to give them? or... only let in those willing to be part of something like that? make it a gov't program of sorts... not quite democratic, and somewhat communist but beggers cant be choosers, right? most immigrants come in and remain around the coasts or not far from the region of their homeland which is part of the reason border cities and states tend to be more populated than say... in WY, Idaho or Iowa or the Dakotas. what if we put them to work on some of our smaller organic farms for instance.. or in factories (please dont take these examples as tho they are the only possibilities.. they're only examples and not meant to be focused on) they're willing to work for less money anyway it seems and willing to do the things most of us born and bred americans would be too proud (or lazy) to do. so give them lesser wages than the born american, but at the same time make their wages more than what they would be in their country of origin to make it worth while.
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 9:16 am


Calypsophia
I didnt say it was law, all I said is it rather 'insinuates' that all are indeed welcome. why have it there if it's not what we truly believe? I agree there has to be some kind of limit.

I don't really think any one comes to this country thinking they're going to be allowed in based on what it says on the statue of liberty, though. As you said, there has to some kind of limit, either way. Like the lady you were talking about earlier who ogt deported after 10 years (was it?) of living here. Do you know why she was rejected? What if it was because so many people had already come into the country? Not that I'm saying I agree with it taking so long for them to get their denial. Nor do I think that, if indeed they were denied, any of them (including their kids) should be allowed to stay. Technically, they are not U.S. citizens if they are born to parents, none of whom are U.S. citizens.

Calypsophia
as for your example with charities, if I had the money to give, I'd rather not actually give the money, but buy the items they need and send them that. blankets and first aid kits to the red cross, for example. I dont trust some charity organizations when it comes to money. I just dont have that extensive faith in people in general when it comes to money.

I fear you may have missed the point of my analogy. I'm saying that you wouldn't give and give to others until you didn't even have the means to support your own self, would you? You wouldn't spend all of your money buying items to send to charities until you didn't even have enough money to pay your own bills would you? Or let's say money was already tight, you wouldn't go out and then spend a substantial sum of your pay check to donate, would you? Because our country is in a similar quandary.

Calypsophia
here's a question to pose: what if those we let in had to accept the jobs and places to live that the govt is willing to give them? or... only let in those willing to be part of something like that? make it a gov't program of sorts... not quite democratic, and somewhat communist but beggers cant be choosers, right? most immigrants come in and remain around the coasts or not far from the region of their homeland which is part of the reason border cities and states tend to be more populated than say... in WY, Idaho or Iowa or the Dakotas. what if we put them to work on some of our smaller organic farms for instance.. or in factories (please dont take these examples as tho they are the only possibilities.. they're only examples and not meant to be focused on) they're willing to work for less money anyway it seems and willing to do the things most of us born and bred americans would be too proud (or lazy) to do. so give them lesser wages than the born american, but at the same time make their wages more than what they would be in their country of origin to make it worth while.

Ah, but that's just it. Why should we go giving jobs away to foreigners if a fair percent of our own citizens don't even have jobs? This goes back to my charity example. Trying to financially support others before yourself. Our government does not have an obligation to those people, because they are not citizens, but they do have a responsibility to their own people. I'm sure if jobs like that exist, the what, 33% of unemployed in this country would like to know about them. Why should we hire our foreigners for less money when some of our own people don't have jobs. You're saying our own citizens should go penniless so that immigrants can have jobs? Then our own citizens become a financial burden on the rest of us, when the entire problem could be averted by just not letting those people in the country to begin with.

namida_no_chi


Sakyh
Crew

PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:28 pm


*insert very loud and long useage of profanity here* Sorry I just wrote an entire page worth of commentry on this topic and it's gone. And it's 1:14 in the morning.

I think this is the first time I have agreed with you on something Namida.

Illegal immigrants are bankrupting our economy. Yes they are taking low-paying jobs, but they are also making use of services on which they don't pay tazes. And taxes is where our government gets money for all the programs it funds (Social security, welfare, medicare/medicade, etc.). And some, not a big percentage mind, but some none-the-less are committing horrendous attrocities here.

I think deportation should be decided on a case-by-case basis. And families should not be deported, nor broken up. That's just cruel. For those instances, and others, I believe they should pay a steep fine. However, it is stupid to believe they could pay such a thing at one time. Such a fine should be paid through monthley payments that are flexible so that the illegals can actually pay the fine without going broke, more so.

I believe extensive background checks should be done on those who wish to come here, but once they pass it...it should not be so dang hard to get a work visa. It should only be difficult if they want to be a citizen. Most don't, they want to work to support their families. We can't really blame them, after all isn't a nickname of ours the "land of opportunity?"

I have no problems with a citizenship test being arduous, but a worker's visa? Cut them some slack.

I think it should be madatory for them to learn english, even if they just want to work here. English is the language of the majority (and it should be the national language but thanks to the 'politically correctness' and 'we dont want to hurt anyone's feelings' trend going on, that's not gonna happen) and they need to learn it so that they can't be taken advantage of. And when I say learn, I mean become literate in. And, such a mandate would give jobs to those who are bilengual. Meaning the people wanting work visas could learn english, then teach it to others rather than do construction or work at MacDonalds.

Like Calypsophia said, we have it in writing that anyone is welcomed here (just not bad crinimals). We are a "melting pot" we are a land made up of imigrants. Heck, if you're white, you're most likely a mutt made up of several ethniticities.

Mind, every last generation of our country has had an ethnic group that was despised. Irish, Germans, Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Cubans (I think they were once...), and others were all met with hatred and dispise. Hispanics are simply the group of the decade.

Oh! That reminds me, it's not just Mexicans. Mexico is just the country Latin Americans use to get here. A good majority come from countries like Hondorus I believe. Just throwing that out there.

I feel that there is more I am forgetting but it is 1:30 am now and I've had a long day. Good nite.

NOTE: I didn't read anythign past Calyposophia's post so I repeated anything...sorry. I'm tired. Wasn't up to reading everything.
PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 7:06 am


namida_no_chi
Calypsophia
I didnt say it was law, all I said is it rather 'insinuates' that all are indeed welcome. why have it there if it's not what we truly believe? I agree there has to be some kind of limit.

I don't really think any one comes to this country thinking they're going to be allowed in based on what it says on the statue of liberty, though. As you said, there has to some kind of limit, either way. Like the lady you were talking about earlier who ogt deported after 10 years (was it?) of living here. Do you know why she was rejected? What if it was because so many people had already come into the country? Not that I'm saying I agree with it taking so long for them to get their denial. Nor do I think that, if indeed they were denied, any of them (including their kids) should be allowed to stay. Technically, they are not U.S. citizens if they are born to parents, none of whom are U.S. citizens.

Calypsophia
as for your example with charities, if I had the money to give, I'd rather not actually give the money, but buy the items they need and send them that. blankets and first aid kits to the red cross, for example. I dont trust some charity organizations when it comes to money. I just dont have that extensive faith in people in general when it comes to money.

I fear you may have missed the point of my analogy. I'm saying that you wouldn't give and give to others until you didn't even have the means to support your own self, would you? You wouldn't spend all of your money buying items to send to charities until you didn't even have enough money to pay your own bills would you? Or let's say money was already tight, you wouldn't go out and then spend a substantial sum of your pay check to donate, would you? Because our country is in a similar quandary.

Calypsophia
here's a question to pose: what if those we let in had to accept the jobs and places to live that the govt is willing to give them? or... only let in those willing to be part of something like that? make it a gov't program of sorts... not quite democratic, and somewhat communist but beggers cant be choosers, right? most immigrants come in and remain around the coasts or not far from the region of their homeland which is part of the reason border cities and states tend to be more populated than say... in WY, Idaho or Iowa or the Dakotas. what if we put them to work on some of our smaller organic farms for instance.. or in factories (please dont take these examples as tho they are the only possibilities.. they're only examples and not meant to be focused on) they're willing to work for less money anyway it seems and willing to do the things most of us born and bred americans would be too proud (or lazy) to do. so give them lesser wages than the born american, but at the same time make their wages more than what they would be in their country of origin to make it worth while.

Ah, but that's just it. Why should we go giving jobs away to foreigners if a fair percent of our own citizens don't even have jobs? This goes back to my charity example. Trying to financially support others before yourself. Our government does not have an obligation to those people, because they are not citizens, but they do have a responsibility to their own people. I'm sure if jobs like that exist, the what, 33% of unemployed in this country would like to know about them. Why should we hire our foreigners for less money when some of our own people don't have jobs. You're saying our own citizens should go penniless so that immigrants can have jobs? Then our own citizens become a financial burden on the rest of us, when the entire problem could be averted by just not letting those people in the country to begin with.


it's not a matter of should. it's a matter of trying to be fair to all. at least as fair as possible. the fact that this country was made up entirely of immigrants (except for the natives, but we pretty much killed them off), and now we have this attitude of 'why should we' makes us seem like a bunch of hypocrites.. (granted, we look like hypocrites for a lot of other reasons to the rest of the world too tho but that's another story). technically, after what the early white immigrants did to the indians I dont feel that any of us have a real right to this land. we dont own it. we set up the illusion that we do, but we dont...we dont really own anything. I'm trying not to come from a greedy 'these jobs are MINE, this country is MINE' kind of attitude. I'm sick and tired of money ruling every single decision we make. it's the way civilization is built, and I cant do anything about it, but christ, our values are in the wrong place. they (civilized mentality) make it so that we dont have much of a choice but to be this way and sometimes I hate myself for it. for going along with it.. but if I didnt I'd likely be homeless and so would my children.

the whole thing just makes me mad.

Calypsophia


Calypsophia

PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 7:21 am


Sakyh
*insert very loud and long useage of profanity here* Sorry I just wrote an entire page worth of commentry on this topic and it's gone. And it's 1:14 in the morning.

I think this is the first time I have agreed with you on something Namida.

Illegal immigrants are bankrupting our economy. Yes they are taking low-paying jobs, but they are also making use of services on which they don't pay tazes. And taxes is where our government gets money for all the programs it funds (Social security, welfare, medicare/medicade, etc.). And some, not a big percentage mind, but some none-the-less are committing horrendous attrocities here.

I think deportation should be decided on a case-by-case basis. And families should not be deported, nor broken up. That's just cruel. For those instances, and others, I believe they should pay a steep fine. However, it is stupid to believe they could pay such a thing at one time. Such a fine should be paid through monthley payments that are flexible so that the illegals can actually pay the fine without going broke, more so.

I believe extensive background checks should be done on those who wish to come here, but once they pass it...it should not be so dang hard to get a work visa. It should only be difficult if they want to be a citizen. Most don't, they want to work to support their families. We can't really blame them, after all isn't a nickname of ours the "land of opportunity?"

I have no problems with a citizenship test being arduous, but a worker's visa? Cut them some slack.

I think it should be madatory for them to learn english, even if they just want to work here. English is the language of the majority (and it should be the national language but thanks to the 'politically correctness' and 'we dont want to hurt anyone's feelings' trend going on, that's not gonna happen) and they need to learn it so that they can't be taken advantage of. And when I say learn, I mean become literate in. And, such a mandate would give jobs to those who are bilengual. Meaning the people wanting work visas could learn english, then teach it to others rather than do construction or work at MacDonalds.

Like Calypsophia said, we have it in writing that anyone is welcomed here (just not bad crinimals). We are a "melting pot" we are a land made up of imigrants. Heck, if you're white, you're most likely a mutt made up of several ethniticities.

Mind, every last generation of our country has had an ethnic group that was despised. Irish, Germans, Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Cubans (I think they were once...), and others were all met with hatred and dispise. Hispanics are simply the group of the decade.

Oh! That reminds me, it's not just Mexicans. Mexico is just the country Latin Americans use to get here. A good majority come from countries like Hondorus I believe. Just throwing that out there.

I feel that there is more I am forgetting but it is 1:30 am now and I've had a long day. Good nite.

NOTE: I didn't read anythign past Calyposophia's post so I repeated anything...sorry. I'm tired. Wasn't up to reading everything.


you are 100% correct. and the reason these immigrants were all despised was only because they'd take jobs away from people already born here. but the difference between the immigrants of today and those back then, is
for the most part, immigrants of the past endeavored to learn english.. they werent catered to the way immigrants here are. it pisses me off to see written driving tests in spanish, french, german, etc... wtf? what happened to when in rome.....

and I'm a perfect example of a white born american mutt. I'm 3rd generation american born on my mothers side (not sure about my fathers side), and my bloodlines between consist of german, swedish, finnish, polish, english, and french canadian. and that's just me, my first husband had a lot more in his bloodline including scots, irish, and swiss.. so my only child pretty much represents all of europe with the exception of spain! lol
PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 4:08 pm


Sakyh
*insert very loud and long useage of profanity here* Sorry I just wrote an entire page worth of commentry on this topic and it's gone. And it's 1:14 in the morning.

I had a similar thing happen to me. My internet browser just suddenly decided to update itsself when I was right in the middle of typing. Luckily when the updated version came up my text was still there.

Sakyh
*I think this is the first time I have agreed with you on something Namida.

I think you might be right. Hey, there's another one for ya. XP

Sakyh
*Illegal immigrants are bankrupting our economy. Yes they are taking low-paying jobs, but they are also making use of services on which they don't pay tazes. And taxes is where our government gets money for all the programs it funds (Social security, welfare, medicare/medicade, etc.). And some, not a big percentage mind, but some none-the-less are committing horrendous attrocities here.

True, true.

Sakyh
*I think deportation should be decided on a case-by-case basis. And families should not be deported, nor broken up. That's just cruel. For those instances, and others, I believe they should pay a steep fine. However, it is stupid to believe they could pay such a thing at one time. Such a fine should be paid through monthley payments that are flexible so that the illegals can actually pay the fine without going broke, more so.

I think deportation should apply to everyone who came in illegally. But not really for say, someone who's visa has expired. Deportation shouldn't be something that could break up families. In the instances of families who illegally come in together, they can just as easily be deported together. And like in the instance Calyposophia pointed out, I think EVEYONE in the family should be deported. The children, which seem to be the reason the government is letting any of them stay, are NOT legal citizens. Therefore I don't see why they are being allowed to stay. Sure it sucks that the only life that they've ever known is here, and they're accustomed to this sort of lifestyle, but I blame that situation on the government. if they had adequately done their job to begin with, that situation would not have come about. but at the same time I don't agree with like, some of these Mexican women coming over here illegally to have the babies and then using that as an excuse to stay in the country because the child is supposed to be American by being born here. But the child would not be an American because neither of its parents are American citizens. That same thing applies in the earlier mentioned case.

Sakyh
*I believe extensive background checks should be done on those who wish to come here, but once they pass it...it should not be so dang hard to get a work visa. It should only be difficult if they want to be a citizen. Most don't, they want to work to support their families. We can't really blame them, after all isn't a nickname of ours the "land of opportunity?"

Agreed, agreed.

Sakyh
*I have no problems with a citizenship test being arduous, but a worker's visa? Cut them some slack.

I agree. I mean, at least a background check or something on the person to make sure they're not criminals. but it shouldn't take longer to approve the visa, than the visa will actually last. -_-

Sakyh
*I think it should be madatory for them to learn english, even if they just want to work here. English is the language of the majority (and it should be the national language but thanks to the 'politically correctness' and 'we dont want to hurt anyone's feelings' trend going on, that's not gonna happen) and they need to learn it so that they can't be taken advantage of. And when I say learn, I mean become literate in. And, such a mandate would give jobs to those who are bilengual. Meaning the people wanting work visas could learn english, then teach it to others rather than do construction or work at MacDonalds.

I totally agree. I hate how we're having to bend over backwards as a society just to accommidate people who aren't even citizens here (because I believe one of the requirements of being a citizen is that you actually have to speak English), because they don't even speak the language. Everthing has to be billingual now, and it only creates more work, and makes things more complicated. Don't go live in a country if you can't speak the language. Because you can't expect society to create special treatment for you (although we seem to be doing just that, creating everything in english and spanish, as if we're encouraging illegals from Mexico and South America, or other people who can't speak enough english to survive and do things like buy groceries or talk to a doctor, to come here).

Sakyh
*Like Calypsophia said, we have it in writing that anyone is welcomed here (just not bad crinimals). We are a "melting pot" we are a land made up of imigrants. Heck, if you're white, you're most likely a mutt made up of several ethniticities.

Yeah, we have a lot of things in writing that we don't really abide by. Like some places in the constitution which still refer to blacks as like 3/4 of a person, or whatever. Hey, if were up to me, we'd give this entire nation back to the Natives, because in my opinion, no one else has any business (or right) being here. But that's a slightly different conversation. I liek to think that my being from several European, black, and native american heritage, I still maintain a fair view. As opposed to a lot of God-fearing, fight to the death, white-bred americans who don't like to admit that their ancestors were murderous thieves, and that this country is founded on just about EVERYTHING that is illegal in its own society. The thing that really chaps my a** about that is how they try to glorify those people and make them seem to great. And they try to white-wash their atrocities in history books by either excluding the details, or trying to minimize them. Saying things like they "found" or "settles" or "claimed some place". Failing to mention all the people they had to kick off or kill that place in order to do that. XD What do you think would happen if someone had tried to do the same thing to Europe? Although I think we've already seen this somewhat demonstrated by invasions of European countries by other European countries. Notice how Germany "INVADED" most of Europe in the second world war, not "settled", or "claimed"?

Sakyh
*Mind, every last generation of our country has had an ethnic group that was despised. Irish, Germans, Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Cubans (I think they were once...), and others were all met with hatred and dispise. Hispanics are simply the group of the decade.

I don't really think that would be the case though if we didn't have so many illegal immigrants from those countries here, doing the things we've mentioned.

Sakyh
*Oh! That reminds me, it's not just Mexicans. Mexico is just the country Latin Americans use to get here. A good majority come from countries like Hondorus I believe. Just throwing that out there.

Yes, but Mexico has their fare share here too. I've heard that they actually have a lot of illegals using the Mexican boarder to cross over from all different countries. Like these people I heard about who tracked a group of Al Qaeda (sp?) through the Mexican boarder.

Sakyh
*I feel that there is more I am forgetting but it is 1:30 am now and I've had a long day. Good nite.

NOTE: I didn't read anythign past Calyposophia's post so I repeated anything...sorry. I'm tired. Wasn't up to reading everything.

namida_no_chi


Guru Drak

Omnipresent Elder

PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 4:23 pm


I am unsure of the northern border, but the southern, on land to land, I had thought, how hard is it to finance a concrete wall, or to electrify one, to discourage fleeing into this country, or even just to travel to it if not fleeing.
PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 4:41 pm


Calypsophia
it's not a matter of should. it's a matter of trying to be fair to all.

What about fair to the people that are already here? It's not fair to them that they shouldn't have jobs, but some person who moves here to suck money out of the economy and send it back to another country does? What about fair to the native Americans. As far as I'm concerned, we're ALL illegal immigrants (aside form the natives).

Calypsophia
at least as fair as possible. the fact that this country was made up entirely of immigrants (except for the natives, but we pretty much killed them off), and now we have this attitude of 'why should we' makes us seem like a bunch of hypocrites.. (granted, we look like hypocrites for a lot of other reasons to the rest of the world too tho but that's another story).

Woah woah woah. I as an individual don't think I am hypocritical about being insensitive to immigrants, because I am also insensitive to people already here. But yes, the majority of our population who believe they have some right to be here, as if they aren't 600th generation illegal immigrants, ARE hypocrites. You know, when I say something like that, people usually say something like "well that was my ancestors, and that was several hundred years ago. No body who even did any of that is still alive." I say: As long as you perpetuate the crime, you're just a guilty as the people who originally committed it.

Calypsophia
technically, after what the early white immigrants did to the indians I dont feel that any of us have a real right to this land. we dont own it. we set up the illusion that we do, but we dont...we dont really own anything.

Agreed. The thing that makes me mad is that a lot of native Americans are still living in poverty on reservations that are in shitty parts of the country. Contrary to what some people believe, not every native American owns a casino. -_- That's like saying every white person is as rich as Bill Gates.

Calypsophia
I'm trying not to come from a greedy 'these jobs are MINE, this country is MINE' kind of attitude. I'm sick and tired of money ruling every single decision we make. it's the way civilization is built, and I cant do anything about it, but christ, our values are in the wrong place. they (civilized mentality) make it so that we dont have much of a choice but to be this way and sometimes I hate myself for it. for going along with it.. but if I didnt I'd likely be homeless and so would my children.

I know what you mean. I hate so many things about this country and the way it is and has been run. I think of it like this: My ancestors were native americans who were shat on by the Europeans who came over here with guns, and thought that gave them some sort of right to be here. They continue to be shat on to this day by the situations a lot of them have been forced into, and are often ignored. Some of my other ancestors were africans who were kidnapped and forced into slaves, and then looked upon with disgust as if they were sub human. And they acted as if the Africans have no right to be here, when the white people are the ones who crought them here to being with. They have pretty much been shat on for the last 400 years (although less that it used to be within the last 30 or so). Some of my white ancestors were English and were part of the original colony in Georgia that was a debttor's prison. They were shat on by other white people because the system they were in caused them to be poor. Another of my ancestors were Irish immigrants (since the early 1900s), and they were also shat on by other white people for being Irish. What exactly do I have to be thankful for? What has this country done, but continually shat on my ancestors? That is what it is FOUNDED upon, the mistreatment of other people, a lot of whom I just happened to be composed of.

the whole thing just makes me mad.
you and me both

namida_no_chi


namida_no_chi

PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 4:43 pm


Drak of Paradise
I am unsure of the northern border, but the southern, on land to land, I had thought, how hard is it to finance a concrete wall, or to electrify one, to discourage fleeing into this country, or even just to travel to it if not fleeing.

Or a shark infested moat? xd

No but seriously. Our country spends untold sums of money to spoiled politicians so they can afford 2 houses and limo service everywhere, and other rediculous, frivilous things. I don't see why we couldn't spring for the money to, hm, I dunno, protect our own country.
Reply
Ethics and Serious Debates

Goto Page: 1 2 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum