|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 11:35 am
So, we've all seen the posts in here quoting the Bible as proof to back a claim. The question is, does it qualify as actual proof? Apparently, the majority of us don't believe so, but there are supporters of both sides. So, let's examine it in full, right here, so we won't keep arguing about it in other threads.
I realize that not everyone here is religious. I know I'm not. We believe the Bible doesn't constitute real proof because it's steeped in falsehoods and contradictions. Compared to science, it holds no ground. Beliefs can't be proven or disproven, and that makes them difficult to argue, whether for or against. They have to be taken largely in faith.
As far as debates go, I don't think beliefs should be used as a basis for argument, because there's nothing to argue. You can't prove whether or not a belief is wrong. There's no winner in an argument based on faith. Neither side is going to give any ground. Perhaps that's why some people rely on using beliefs to back their claims, because they know it's impossible to lose.
In any case, I don't think the Bible should be used as evidence when attempting to argue a point. If it were based on more than just faith, it'd be a different story, but as I've said, beliefs can't be argued against, and that ruins the entire premise of having a debate.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:03 pm
Most people use the bible as guidlines to life. It teaches them what is right and wrong, and "truth". To them the Bible is "truth" and to other's science is "truth". Where is it anyone's place to say the bible is wrong, and science is right?
~ I Love Tommy ~
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:55 pm
I believe that evolution and/or the bible should only be used in a debate where neither side of the said debate can be proven.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 1:20 pm
but the bible wouldnt prove anything either o.O
in my case, im religious, but i never bring up the bible cause most people will find my argument as important as if id said 'Hey! Harry Potter said that...' rolleyes which i say sometimes xD but only among geeks.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 1:51 pm
Rockula but the bible wouldnt prove anything either o.O in my case, im religious, but i never bring up the bible cause most people will find my argument as important as if id said 'Hey! Harry Potter said that...' rolleyes which i say sometimes xD but only among geeks. lol
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 3:24 pm
Kyle Riley
Most people use the bible as guidlines to life. It teaches them what is right and wrong, and "truth". To them the Bible is "truth" and to other's science is "truth". Where is it anyone's place to say the bible is wrong, and science is right?
~ I Love Tommy ~ Science may not be any more right than the Bible, but science is something that can be proven, usually through math. In incidents of morals, of course, it's a different matter. "Right vs wrong" follows different rules than "true vs false". I suppose I should have clarified that in the beginning.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 5:41 pm
[Hmmm. I'm not sure because most people who use the bible in debate, that I have encountered, always attack the other person instead of debating so it turns into a huge fight instead of debate.
Personally I think if you can use it in an acceptable way that makes sense and that is not attacking the other and actually debating the subject then go right ahead.]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 6:17 pm
Zorlock Darksoul Kyle Riley
Most people use the bible as guidlines to life. It teaches them what is right and wrong, and "truth". To them the Bible is "truth" and to other's science is "truth". Where is it anyone's place to say the bible is wrong, and science is right?
~ I Love Tommy ~ Science may not be any more right than the Bible, but science is something that can be proven, usually through math. In incidents of morals, of course, it's a different matter. "Right vs wrong" follows different rules than "true vs false". I suppose I should have clarified that in the beginning.
FYI: When I said right I meant truth.
Math is only numbers. There are people who don't believe science. Some people still think the world is flat, others don't believe evolution ever occurred. Just because science said it did, doesn't make them believe it anyone more. That is the exact same as your view on the Bible; Just because the Bible says so doesn't make it true.
~ I Love Tommy ~
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:19 pm
I think it should be allowed. I mean, your opinions are based on your beliefs, right? whatever it may be. The only problem I have with it, is that people who debate from a completely religious point of view, often don't really know their material. The main reason I personally hate all religions is the brain washing factor. When you finally stopped just taking the preacher's word for it and do the research yourself, that's what it needs to come down to for debates on your religious POV. You need to know ALL the facts and conditions. Not just a verse or two.
And also the fact is that people who have already been 'brain washed' as it were, get easily offended and angered. They like others to see what they think(or have been taught to think), but freak out if someone tries to counter it.
And the reason I think people even join religions is because they're too lazy to think for themselves and would rather be told what to think. Not that everyone is. Many debaters and religion followers from all points of view really know their stuff. But the laziness thing is my personal experience with religions.
But that's a whole 'nother debate... ^^;
Point is, it should be allowed like any other source, but people who use their source better know it well and be prepared to be countered.

|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:30 am
If someone believes in the Bible, I don't see why they shouldn't be allowed to use information gathered from it. But on the other side, what if they encounter someone who isn't religious and doesn't believe in the Bible?
That's pretty much having someone arguing their view, using something that the other person believes to be 100% fake. How is that debate going to get anywhere?~ I Love Kyle. ~
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:06 am
Kyle Riley Zorlock Darksoul Kyle Riley
Most people use the bible as guidlines to life. It teaches them what is right and wrong, and "truth". To them the Bible is "truth" and to other's science is "truth". Where is it anyone's place to say the bible is wrong, and science is right?
~ I Love Tommy ~ Science may not be any more right than the Bible, but science is something that can be proven, usually through math. In incidents of morals, of course, it's a different matter. "Right vs wrong" follows different rules than "true vs false". I suppose I should have clarified that in the beginning.
FYI: When I said right I meant truth.
Math is only numbers. There are people who don't believe science. Some people still think the world is flat, others don't believe evolution ever occurred. Just because science said it did, doesn't make them believe it anyone more. That is the exact same as your view on the Bible; Just because the Bible says so doesn't make it true.
~ I Love Tommy ~ Math is fact. There's no denying math. 2+2=4. Science that is based solely on math is irrefutable, assuming the calculations are correct. Science that is based on something other than math (like evolution) is open for debate, of course. That's why the final step in any scientific endeavor is to prove it mathematically, so it becomes an undeniable fact. As a side note, who the hell still believes the world is flat? Introduce me to them so I can fire them into space to see for themselves.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:24 am
Zorlock Darksoul Kyle Riley Zorlock Darksoul Kyle Riley
Most people use the bible as guidlines to life. It teaches them what is right and wrong, and "truth". To them the Bible is "truth" and to other's science is "truth". Where is it anyone's place to say the bible is wrong, and science is right?
~ I Love Tommy ~ Science may not be any more right than the Bible, but science is something that can be proven, usually through math. In incidents of morals, of course, it's a different matter. "Right vs wrong" follows different rules than "true vs false". I suppose I should have clarified that in the beginning.
FYI: When I said right I meant truth.
Math is only numbers. There are people who don't believe science. Some people still think the world is flat, others don't believe evolution ever occurred. Just because science said it did, doesn't make them believe it anyone more. That is the exact same as your view on the Bible; Just because the Bible says so doesn't make it true.
~ I Love Tommy ~ Math is fact. There's no denying math. 2+2=4. Science that is based solely on math is irrefutable, assuming the calculations are correct. Science that is based on something other than math (like evolution) is open for debate, of course. That's why the final step in any scientific endeavor is to prove it mathematically, so it becomes an undeniable fact.
That wasn't exactly my point. I was pointing out that different people believe different things. Just because you think science is right doesn't mean everyone does. And if someone is allowed to debate about open ended nonscientific fact then others should be allowed to debate using a Bible.
~ I Love Tommy ~
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:25 am
You have the key... Honestly, I believe using the Bible as fact in a debate should be confined to religious debate and such. If it's brought up between someone who believes the Bible to be fact and someone who completely regards it as false, it'll just turn into a debate ABOUT the Bible, God, Jesus, etc.
I don't really believe the Bible, since I want physical scientific proof it was actually written by someone 'touched by God.' Hell, if I were given any physical proof at all that there's even a God, I'd become Christian all over again.
Blind faith just doesn't work with me. So the Bible is not something I prefer people to use in a debate that doesn't involve religion. To unlock my heart. <3
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:38 am
I agree, things can get way out of hand whenever religions are discussed, but it's mostly because the threads in this forum aren't really all debates. A lot of it is technically just discussion of POVs and opinions. When you debate, you should avoid, "I think..." statements and just put the facts from your source. Your opinion on the matter will be known by which side you chose in the debate. In a real debate, the opponents agree at the beginning that their sources are considered fact by that person. And the counter debate must take the into consideration. It's like the saying goes. "Keep your friends close but your enemies closer." The key to winning a debate is knowing your material AND your opponent's better than they do. x3
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:53 am
waratte naite kimi to deaete mieru sekai wa kagayakidashita himawari yureru taiyou no shita de kanjite ita kaze wo kimi wo
I think it should be allowed.
I don't think people who post their "opinions", that are based on what they've learned through their religion, post because they want to start an arguement over religion. They are just giving their point of view on the situation. Anyone who can't sit and read someone's point without jumping on them should leave.
If someone can't use their beliefs in their points, then this forum isn't going to go anywhere.
-Agrees with Kyle, Tom and Camo-
Laughing, crying, meeting you The world I saw began to shine Under the sun where the sunflowers swayed I felt the wind, I felt you
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|