Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply Pro-Choice Gaians
About the "Sexual Acceptance" Petition and PCG Policy

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Veled
Captain

Quotable Conventioneer

8,000 Points
  • Person of Interest 200
  • Conventioneer 300
  • Forum Sophomore 300
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 9:28 am


I really hate that I have to even take a stand on this.

... I don't really even get why a bunch of people who would be getting their panties in a wad over not being allowed to talk about ***** (or BDSM, or whatever their topic du jour is) want anything to do with the PCG aside from it being a fairly lax guild. My guess is that most of the people signing it are trolling -- MOST, not all.

I hate the idea that Gaia has to crack down on this s**t in the first place, but really I think it's mostly the hobgoblin of trolling versus there being enough sick ******** on Gaia to warrant further concern.

However, I see no reason why this guild has to support either of them. From personal experience, I have no tolerance for anyone who takes pleasure in the torment of other individuals, and sexual torment especially. It is not in line with the intent of this guild --- that is, To support the rights and autonomy of women and their reproductive capacity -- and I see no reason why sexual non-consensual fetishes have anything to do with this guild.

This said, until further notice:

arrow This guild WILL consider The Freedom of Speech Petition and other similar fetishist material to be trolling, and very not-in-line with our "pro-woman, pro-child, pro-choice" mentality, or the Gaian TOS for that matter.

exclaim Trolling IS a valid reason to be refused admittance to the guild or removed from it. Stricter definitions of what is and isn't trolling will surface as the need arises.

exclaim Support of the petition is NOT a reason in and of itself for disciplinary actions, but since several of the members associated with it have been griefing other PCG members, there may be delays in your admission to the guild or other similar complications if you align yourself with this petition.

If you have a problem with this, bring it up either in this thread or with me in private. Rational heads will prevail, after all.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 9:43 am


Wait. So if we agree with the Freedom of Speech petition or show support for it, it'll be considered trolling and is grounds for our removal?

Lady Adriata

Friendly Entrepreneur

7,800 Points
  • Tycoon 200
  • Profitable 100
  • The Perfect Setup 150

Veled
Captain

Quotable Conventioneer

8,000 Points
  • Person of Interest 200
  • Conventioneer 300
  • Forum Sophomore 300
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 11:50 am


Lady Adriata
Wait. So if we agree with the Freedom of Speech petition or show support for it, it'll be considered trolling and is grounds for our removal?

No.

I was receiving several complaints about trolls and other disruptors that originated from this petition, and have been asked to take out a stance concerning it.

Discussion of illicit acts is one thing, but I have reason to believe that most of the support in this petition is either implicit approval of several of these actions or else trolls supporting it for shock value.

It'd be like trying to be in both the PLG and PCG at the same time; we'd like you to at least have a Damn Good Reason about it.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 12:08 pm


Ah.

I support the petition on the basis that I agree with people being able to DISCUSS taboo subjects in an un-biased manner. As long as said guilds are NOT encouraging illegal activity I see no reason for them to be removed, nor for the people who participate to be banned. I support free speech, even if said speech makes me uncomfortable.

That being said I suppose I just have a hard time understanding how it has anything to do with PCG? They're really separate issues. Taking a stance on abortion isn't taboo the way *****, extreme fetishes, etc is..

Is this because we have many members of the PCG who've also supported the petition, in signatures, etc? I'm just confused about the relevance here.

Lady Adriata

Friendly Entrepreneur

7,800 Points
  • Tycoon 200
  • Profitable 100
  • The Perfect Setup 150

Veled
Captain

Quotable Conventioneer

8,000 Points
  • Person of Interest 200
  • Conventioneer 300
  • Forum Sophomore 300
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 1:05 pm


Lady Adriata
I just have a hard time understanding how it has anything to do with PCG? They're really separate issues. Taking a stance on abortion isn't taboo the way *****, extreme fetishes, etc is.

Is this because we have many members of the PCG who've also supported the petition, in signatures, etc? I'm just confused about the relevance here.

Several of the more prominent supporters of the petition have been coming into this guild and griefing other members. Since many of these supporters had their friends banned for (probably) good reason, we don't necessarily want the PCG getting mixed up in this.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 1:09 pm


Veled
Lady Adriata
I just have a hard time understanding how it has anything to do with PCG? They're really separate issues. Taking a stance on abortion isn't taboo the way *****, extreme fetishes, etc is.

Is this because we have many members of the PCG who've also supported the petition, in signatures, etc? I'm just confused about the relevance here.

Several of the more prominent supporters of the petition have been coming into this guild and griefing other members. Since many of these supporters had their friends banned for (probably) good reason, we don't necessarily want the PCG getting mixed up in this.


Ahhhh. Thanks for the explanation. 3nodding

Lady Adriata

Friendly Entrepreneur

7,800 Points
  • Tycoon 200
  • Profitable 100
  • The Perfect Setup 150

Trite~Elegy

PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:23 pm


Can't this be taken up as a harassment issue Veled?

The 'more prominent freedom of speech petition supporters' who come into the PCG with the intent to gain support through emotional tactics?

I support freedom of speech in general; and lets face it, we pretty much
have total freedom of speech in the PCG as long as it is not at the cost of another member - but what the petition is doing imo is pure bullying/harassment.

Are there not any mod's investigating this issue?
I mean god forbid should the PCG have to 'shut down & clean up' as Nikolita did with her guild just because some nitwits have a tizzy over things we say.
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 7:01 am


Trite~Elegy
Can't this be taken up as a harassment issue Veled?


For a harassment issue to be taken up with the mods, it would most likely be on a case-by-case basis, and best reported by the individual members.

if you wish to report the petition itself, by all means, but I have not inspected the thread enough and don't know how much content is a true TOS violation.

Consider this a 'n** in the bud' before things get out of hand. This is as much "Don't come here if you're gonna be a d**k' as it is a way for mods in the guild to justify taking the actions against these members that they have been asking for.

Veled
Captain

Quotable Conventioneer

8,000 Points
  • Person of Interest 200
  • Conventioneer 300
  • Forum Sophomore 300

Talon-chan

PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 8:00 am


For some reason I didn't see this announcement before.

I agree completely with your choice V. It is one thing to support the freedom of speech for people to talk about *****... and another entirely to support the rape of little children. The consensual sexual freedoms and rights of the individual to be autonomous have nothing to do with granting people a right to rape children unable to consent. We are not limiting the autonomy of ***** by telling them they cannot infringe on the rights of children by not letting them be raped.

Thank you for taking a clear stand against this.
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 7:38 pm



I do see a problem with ***** and rape fantasies / fetishes.
But I would like to point out that BDSM in a relationship is usually consensual.
I enjoy BDSM in the bedroom. Saying it's about "sexual torment" is a huge generalization and I don't think that's fair.


Veled

Trolling IS a valid reason to be refused admittance to the guild or removed from it. Stricter definitions of what is and isn't trolling will surface as the need arises.



I think that not accepting trolls is a great stance.
But if I supported others who enjoy & engage in BDSM would I have not been accepted?

As I pointed out earlier, BDSM in relationships is often consensual & I think that does align with PCG's policy of supporting the rights and autonomy of women - to allow them to do what they want in their bedroom without the fear of harassment and/or judgment of others.

loony x lovegood


Tragic Christmas
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:22 pm


Promotion of *****, bestiality, etc. was the primary reason for taking action against this sort. I think Veled was using BDSM as an example of people whining about how they can't parade around their fetishes on Gaia, and it's rather irrelevant in the grand scheme of things (I didn't see any evidence of BDSM groups being targeted and deactivated to begin with). Your request would not have been denied, unless you had been supporting about some odd brand of BDSM where people are abused and exploited against their will.
PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 3:37 am


I've seen this petition and I have to say that I am very happy you've decided to take the stance on behalf of this guild. I remember this petition (along with the Freedom of Speech, which must be in line with each other) and many of the things the original petitioners want to discuss is simply not acceptable in this environment and often illegal. Bravo.

Koneko Shai


Deformography

Liberal Genius

2,950 Points
  • Citizen 200
  • Signature Look 250
  • Wall Street 200
PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 11:06 am


Koneko Shai
I've seen this petition and I have to say that I am very happy you've decided to take the stance on behalf of this guild. I remember this petition (along with the Freedom of Speech, which must be in line with each other) and many of the things the original petitioners want to discuss is simply not acceptable in this environment and often illegal. Bravo.


Me too. I smiled so wide when I saw this. I smiled wider when I saw the new TOS.
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:16 pm


Deformography
Koneko Shai
I've seen this petition and I have to say that I am very happy you've decided to take the stance on behalf of this guild. I remember this petition (along with the Freedom of Speech, which must be in line with each other) and many of the things the original petitioners want to discuss is simply not acceptable in this environment and often illegal. Bravo.

Me too. I smiled so wide when I saw this. I smiled wider when I saw the new TOS.

I didn't even see the new version, but gods I LOVE it.

Kata Samoes

Reply
Pro-Choice Gaians

 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum