|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 6:04 am
His first etching of his famous equation  under Broome bridge has been vandalised. It looks horrible now. Hopefully they'll clean it up.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 12:22 pm
Fixed the equation because it was bothering me.
Besides, it kinda was an act of vandalism in itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 10:39 pm
It is vandalism of Historic value!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:19 am
Layra-chan Fixed the equation because it was bothering me. Besides, it kinda was an act of vandalism in itself. What was wrong with the original out of curiosity? A typo or something?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:34 am
Morberticus Layra-chan Fixed the equation because it was bothering me. Besides, it kinda was an act of vandalism in itself. What was wrong with the original out of curiosity? A typo or something? You had pluses instead of equal signs for the first two equalities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:36 am
Dewdew It is vandalism of Historic value! EXACTLY! I wanna be able to walk through alleys at night and read about non commutating complex numbers. I don't wanna read about having a great time if I call some random mobile number, or how Billy <3s Sinead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:39 am
Layra-chan Morberticus Layra-chan Fixed the equation because it was bothering me. Besides, it kinda was an act of vandalism in itself. What was wrong with the original out of curiosity? A typo or something? You had pluses instead of equal signs for the first two equalities. Jaysus that was dumb. Considering I use them often when modelling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 8:54 pm
Morberticus Layra-chan Morberticus Layra-chan Fixed the equation because it was bothering me. Besides, it kinda was an act of vandalism in itself. What was wrong with the original out of curiosity? A typo or something? You had pluses instead of equal signs for the first two equalities. Jaysus that was dumb. Considering I use them often when modeling. Yeah, the algebra you get out of that set of equations isn't nearly as interesting, as it's not a division algebra. Plus, if you set any of the squares equal to one and the others to -1, you get a rather boring commutative algebra as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:31 am
Layra-chan Morberticus Layra-chan Morberticus Layra-chan Fixed the equation because it was bothering me. Besides, it kinda was an act of vandalism in itself. What was wrong with the original out of curiosity? A typo or something? You had pluses instead of equal signs for the first two equalities. Jaysus that was dumb. Considering I use them often when modeling. Yeah, the algebra you get out of that set of equations isn't nearly as interesting, as it's not a division algebra. Plus, if you set any of the squares equal to one and the others to -1, you get a rather boring commutative algebra as well. Heh, I once naively took out a book on quaternions from our library. I was looking for stuff on matrix representation and got a book on division rings instead. Hooray. *practises using the shift key*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
