|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 10:03 pm
Not very often will you find a "conspiracy theory" that is well proven, has actual government documents to back it, and also cites its references. Very few "conspiracy theories" are about AIDS. It took me about half an hour to read all of this, but do so and you'll find yourself feeling very unsafe. Summary This is the most controversial videotape you'll ever see. Dr. Robert Strecker refutes, with documented evidence, virtually everything the so-called experts and Government reports have told you about AIDS. He asserts in no uncertain terms that: AIDS is a MANMADE disease... AIDS is NOT a homosexual disease... AIDS is NOT a vernereal disease... AIDS is can be carried by mosquitos... Condoms will NOT prevent AIDS... There can never be a vaccine. A very disturbing passage Another startling fact that was never mentioned in the mainstream media -- the Hepatitis B Vaccine that was given to several thousand male homosexuals in New York and San Francisco in 1978. The fact is, every single person who received that vaccine contracted AIDS -- every single one of them -- without exception. That is what the first American victims of AIDS all had in common. They were receivers of the Hepatitis B Vaccine. It is a document fact. AIDS began in America in 1978 in the homosexual communities of New York and San Francisco, immediately following a government-sponsored program of Hepatitis B Vaccinations. This is all completely documented -- it is completely true. Read & Discuss. Edit: If you've been in TGG as long as I have, you know I'm a gullible sucker. But I also know when you prove me wrong. And I'm not afraid to look like a total idiot in saying I believe most of this, and definately don't exclude it as a probable theory.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 10:41 pm
I wouldn't put it past the US government. I'm too tired to comment beyond that, and it makes my head hurt to think about it so... that's all I'm gonna say.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 12:58 pm
Admittedly, I didn't finish reading that.
Consipiracy theories like that just don't make sense. You would have to have a government entirely comprised of sociopaths for something like to happen.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 3:27 pm
I read it in. I'm glad I popped into his guild today... I'll admit, it was very disturbing. Very little makes me faint hearted, but that hit home.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 3:36 pm
Invisible Monsters Admittedly, I didn't finish reading that. Consipiracy theories like that just don't make sense. You would have to have a government entirely comprised of sociopaths for something like to happen. Actually, the only thing that didn't add up was that he said their couldn't be a cure for all the strands, but then later he says that after a billion or so people died, they'd magically find a cure. Only inconsistancy I found. But for the second thing about finding a cure, I suppose he meant one or two strands instead of every strand known to man. MaiKun: It made feel very unsafe. I was actually shaking. I always thought you could get AIDS through kissing and s**t, but everyone always reassured me that I was paranoid, and you could only get it from consuming, like, gallons of saliva. Now, Just from coughing on someone? That may be a little over-exaggerating it on the reporter's behalf, but it still doesn't make me feel any better.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 4:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 4:44 pm
I find it more than little disappointing that people would give this anymore of a thought besides the one that people have too much time on their hands.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 4:46 pm
That's how I felt as well.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 5:11 pm
[numbered for "fun"] 1. From the website: "And we also know for a scientific fact that the AIDS virus bears no resemblance whatsoever to any virus ever found in a green monkey, but does bear a total resemblance to cow virus and sheep virus, which have somehow been bonded together. The only possible way these two different species of virus could bond together would be in a laboratory -- something engineered in a laboratory -- and then further engineered to make the jump into a human system." I've got nothing to repute the dates. 2. From your own source: "Saliva. Though HIV is sometimes present in saliva, it apparently exists at very low concentrations. HIV can be in saliva because saliva contains T-cells and macrophages, which rove around the surfaces of the mouth's mucous membrane. The concentration of HIVs in saliva seems to be very low compared to blood and semen. In theory, saliva can transmit HIV infection but, so far, it doesn't seem to have happened in real life. Kissing is discussed in more detail in the next section. Tears. HIV can be obtained from tears, but the concentration seems very small. Also, HIV does not seem to appear consistently in tears. Tears are not likely to transmit HIV infection" It doesn't deny nor confirm. 3. I've got nothing. Other than refer to 1. 4. googling "rabies manmade" turns up no results relating to what we're talking about. I don't know much about Rabies, so I can't say much. But I did say that the reporter was probably exaggerating when he said you could get AIDS from simply sneezing. But it isn't entirely unthinkable, as you can get mono from water molecules in the air. However, if you google "AIDS Manmade", as well as "HIV Manmade", you get a ton of results. Apparently this is a rather popular theory.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 5:20 pm
[Q] 2. From your own source: "Saliva. Though HIV is sometimes present in saliva, it apparently exists at very low concentrations. HIV can be in saliva because saliva contains T-cells and macrophages, which rove around the surfaces of the mouth's mucous membrane. The concentration of HIVs in saliva seems to be very low compared to blood and semen. In theory, saliva can transmit HIV infection but, so far, it doesn't seem to have happened in real life. Kissing is discussed in more detail in the next section. Tears. HIV can be obtained from tears, but the concentration seems very small. Also, HIV does not seem to appear consistently in tears. Tears are not likely to transmit HIV infection" It doesn't deny nor confirm. It denies the part of the article that says saliva has more than semen. [Q] 4. googling "rabies manmade" turns up no results relating to what we're talking about. I don't know much about Rabies, so I can't say much. But I did say that the reporter was probably exaggerating when he said you could get AIDS from simply sneezing. But it isn't entirely unthinkable, as you can get mono from water molecules in the air. However, if you google "AIDS Manmade", as well as "HIV Manmade", you get a ton of results. Apparently this is a rather popular theory. I mentioned rabies because it's a disease that passed from animals to humans. AIDS is always a popular subject because there are so many people that don't understand. They're still teaching wrong s**t about it in schools. Invisible Monsters Admittedly, I didn't finish reading that. Consipiracy theories like that just don't make sense. You would have to have a government entirely comprised of sociopaths for something like to happen. Ryan's right. The biggest flaw in this whole thing is the number of people it would take to pull that off. You're talking scientists, doctors, world leaders... it's insane. They would all have to be willing to kill tons of people. I may be pessimistic and paranoid, but I ABSOLUTELY REFUSE to believe that the people in power are all Ku Klux Klan wannabes. The kind of depraved indiference it would take is too much to logically exist.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 9:09 pm
Oh, Q... *sigh* How much research have you done on AIDS outside of this? I seriously suggest that you take the time to do some. [Q] But I did say that the reporter was probably exaggerating when he said you could get AIDS from simply sneezing. But it isn't entirely unthinkable, as you can get mono from water molecules in the air. Mono and HIV. They are both viral, they both have something to do with T-cells. Both can be carried for exteded periods without symptoms. But they are not the same disease nor do the function in the same way. Really at all. Even in looking at the basics of transmission -- mono, you'll find, is most often tranfered through saliva (hence its nickname: the kissing disease), whereas there are no known instances in which HIV has been transfered through saliva alone. HIV is also extremely difficult to keep alive outside of the body. Scientists have to use artificially high concentrations just to keep the virus alive long to work with. Out of curiousity, where are you getting that tidbit about mono and water molecules in the air? It's not that I don't believe you, but I can't find anything to back it up.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:10 am
Invisible Monsters Admittedly, I didn't finish reading that. Consipiracy theories like that just don't make sense. You would have to have a government entirely comprised of sociopaths for something like to happen. Somehow, that's not the biggest obstacle I see in trying to prove this theory... [Q] [numbered for "fun"] 1. From the website: "And we also know for a scientific fact that the AIDS virus bears no resemblance whatsoever to any virus ever found in a green monkey, but does bear a total resemblance to cow virus and sheep virus, which have somehow been bonded together. The only possible way these two different species of virus could bond together would be in a laboratory -- something engineered in a laboratory -- and then further engineered to make the jump into a human system." I've got nothing to repute the dates. Do you have the knowledge of virology to confirm these claims? Or any reputable source? [Q] 2. From your own source: "Saliva. Though HIV is sometimes present in saliva, it apparently exists at very low concentrations. HIV can be in saliva because saliva contains T-cells and macrophages, which rove around the surfaces of the mouth's mucous membrane. The concentration of HIVs in saliva seems to be very low compared to blood and semen. In theory, saliva can transmit HIV infection but, so far, it doesn't seem to have happened in real life. Kissing is discussed in more detail in the next section. Tears. HIV can be obtained from tears, but the concentration seems very small. Also, HIV does not seem to appear consistently in tears. Tears are not likely to transmit HIV infection" It doesn't deny nor confirm. The brilliance of these conspiracy theories and the "experts" is that they prey on the public who easily assume that the presence of the virus in a medium means it is transmissible through that medium, even when the mathematical liklihood is negligible and there is no evidence to support it. They only leave the possibility open because, as responsible scientists, they cannot dismiss it until it is disproved, likely impossible with today's technology. [Q] 3. I've got nothing. Other than refer to 1. ditto [Q] 4. googling "rabies manmade" turns up no results relating to what we're talking about. I don't know much about Rabies, so I can't say much. But I did say that the reporter was probably exaggerating when he said you could get AIDS from simply sneezing. But it isn't entirely unthinkable, as you can get mono from water molecules in the air. However, if you google "AIDS Manmade", as well as "HIV Manmade", you get a ton of results. Apparently this is a rather popular theory. That is possibly the most flawed argument I've ever heard.( But don't think that you're the only one to make such a mistake.) As we say on the Wikipedia, Google =/= proof. A theory's popularity has no bearing on it's accuracy. What about all the people who thought the world was flat? That diseases were caused by demons? That germs spontaneously came into being? Only scientific research can prove or disprove a scientific claim. The valid research, by the way, indicates that condoms are effective in reducing the risk of transmission by a huge margin. Astri Mono and HIV. They are both viral, they both have something to do with T-cells. Both can be carried for exteded periods without symptoms. But they are not the same disease nor do the function in the same way. Really at all. Even in looking at the basics of transmission -- mono, you'll find, is most often tranfered through saliva (hence its nickname: the kissing disease), whereas there are no known instances in which HIV has been transfered through saliva alone. HIV is also extremely difficult to keep alive outside of the body. Scientists have to use artificially high concentrations just to keep the virus alive long to work with. Out of curiousity, where are you getting that tidbit about mono and water molecules in the air? It's not that I don't believe you, but I can't find anything to back it up. Mono sucks. Why do I always get the intimate diseases when I'm not being intimate? gonk You'r right though, in that a little quick research details just how similar but still quite different these viral particles are.( Mono is actually caused by either of 2 different viruses.)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:15 pm
Also to pick on the "AIDS did not jump species." What about the other viruses that jump species. Rabies is still rampant, but remember the whole SARS issue? The fears of avian flu?
They actually had the time (and more importantly, the money) to track down all "several thousand" Hep B vaccinated gay men from 1978? It was 1978, for crying out loud. Medical files were still written and typed, people moved, people died, and more importantly, people might have been sexually liberated, but there were still many unwilling to come out as gay. For all their physicians could know, they were straight. So why would it only appear in gay men vaccinated?
Plus the theory discounts the women and heterosexual men getting infected and only looks at gay metropolitan centers. Why not all major cities? Why not all countries? Just looking over at Africa, where people are hardly getting sufficient health care, how did 25.4 million sub-Sahara men, women, and children get it from a vaccine most will never get? Why is it so big there, if the US made it? What would they achieve?
I find it great that the author makes such sweeping notions that the US govenment wishes to "depopulate" so accurately, that it only affects certain States or "brown people and yellow people." Why spread it to places like Europe, Canada, Mexico, and South America? Why isn't it limited in range, but spread out across the globe? How would it jump continents?
Also, they didn't explain how a cow virus and sheep virus could be forced to magically "bond together," or "engineered" to jump to humans. Aerobic transmission in 16,000 heath care workers? Nice round number, that means crap all. Firstly, they handle potentially biohazardous materials, like blood. Second there's bound to be some that are are HIV+ or with full blown AIDS. And again, how many is that out of the total number of health care workers? Of which country?
Holes in condoms? Unless you're still using porous sheep skin or deliberately punching holes in it shouldn't be letting anything through. If it did have microscoping holes, why don't latex balloons (and condoms, latex and polyurethane) leak out air, except through their opening? Air molecules infintesimally smaller than any virus or cell. If there's a way out, they would find it.
Sorry, I'll stop poking holes. There's just so much ridiculous information there, and sure maybe there are medical professionals and journals that back it up, but why aren't they making a louder noise about it? If it's such a dangerous conspiracy that they've stumbled on that can be proven to the world, why aren't they on a newscast or hauling their asses to the UN to have something done? It isn't the Spanish Inquisition, and their names are already published in journals and the internet. If the the creators of AIDS are out there and that powerful, why haven't they hunted these doctors that are fudging their plans?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:57 am
Put me off Hepatitis B Vaccine anyday. Gosh. That stuff tastes awful anyway.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|