I would like to state that one study, which only looked at 237 mothers in Baltimore, does not represent all women who have had induced abortions. Not to mention that this data seems to have been collected in the 1980s.
I challenge both the biases of those doing the study, and the application of data from
one city and a
very small group of families to the entire abortion debate.
I mean, I could hand pick some "Pro-Life" mothers who killed or harmed their children (which makes them not actually Pro-Life, hence the quotes), but that wouldn't indicate that
all Pro-Life mothers wish to harm their children.
The data itself seems to be from a study of women who abuse or neglect their children. Really,
all this study can actually conclude is that a portion of these abusive/neglectful women (not even all such women, just these) got abortions.
According to
this chart from that study, the numbers of
really abusive mothers who got abortions and who didn't get abortions were about the same.
I would like to see a larger study done on newly collected data, then I might see the validity of this (if, in fact, new data finds the same results).