|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 3:28 am
I guess you're right DNA, but I still think everyone should just take a step back and a deep breath.
It would just be good if the people involved could work it out and we could all be a big happy Aussie family again sad
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 3:54 am
T'would be better if that was the case yes ;3
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 4:35 am
is there a way we could "un ban" him??
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 7:06 am
nrasjaa is there a way we could "un ban" him?? too late, from what i understand so far from the threads i've read(anything about this really).i dont think bunnah,streek and ws would want to come back afta tis.the damage is done.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 11:57 am
nrasjaa is there a way we could "un ban" him?? That would involve re-inviting him, but that's not an option. As teh Timmay has said, they probably won't want to com back ;D
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 3:04 pm
I'm sorry you guys all feel the need to leave the guild without Bunnah, but he has to learn to accept there are consequences to his actions. The guild would be utter disorder had we feared losing people too much to ban or punish anyone ever.
It's a bit difficult when we have no proof of the posts deleted, and as most people haven't seen them, it is easy for Bunnah and others to deny their existence in the first place. I've stated many times that I've seen them and deleted them, and would bet a December letter that they existed if we could only prove it.
I have to agree with some of you to an extent, that the guild wouldn't be the same without Bunnah. The original purpose of the guild, after all, was to save our group of friends from dying out in GD. We can't, however, just let him get away with all of this without repercussion. I thought of a possible compromise- a permaban. It's used all the time within Gaian forums. We could unban him after three weeks and let him back into the guild, but he has to accept the consequences of his actions.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 4:49 pm
i just feel he need to point out that me and streek never denied they existed. we simply said that they where in other threads or completely off topic
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 4:57 pm
WarriorShadow i just feel he need to point out that me and streek never denied they existed. we simply said that they where in other threads or completely off topic Well guess what, these posts WERE IN SHY'S THREAD. End discussion. Seriously, he's been banned now so can we drop that stupid argument because I know for a fact I saw his posts in that thread and was rather pissed off with him for it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 5:20 pm
Teikou WarriorShadow i just feel he need to point out that me and streek never denied they existed. we simply said that they where in other threads or completely off topic Well guess what, these posts WERE IN SHY'S THREAD. End discussion. Seriously, he's been banned now so can we drop that stupid argument because I know for a fact I saw his posts in that thread and was rather pissed off with him for it. or completely off topicDid you just ignore that part? but i agree bunnah is gone. let the Hostilitys leave with him
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 6:33 pm
WS, have you failed to notice that the posts in Shy's thread aren't even half the reason Bunnah's getting banned? neutral
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|