|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:39 pm
Insomnesiac There's no point in sheeping Peles anyway, because like everyone said the clue is too obvious and we don't know if it really is the real clue to begin with. So no sheeping Peles until way later in the game if the CK hasn't been caught by then. Wait Wait Wait, if this is a true clue, then maybe it was obvious to throw us off and make us suspect it wasnt a true clue or wasnt Peles. SUSPICIOUS!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:57 pm
DeGei Insomnesiac There's no point in sheeping Peles anyway, because like everyone said the clue is too obvious and we don't know if it really is the real clue to begin with. So no sheeping Peles until way later in the game if the CK hasn't been caught by then. Wait Wait Wait, if this is a true clue, then maybe it was obvious to throw us off and make us suspect it wasnt a true clue or wasnt Peles. SUSPICIOUS! I thought about that too, but it's just too incoherent. If even the glimpse of a lead shows up from a valid clue, the filly's good as dead. I guarentee you Peles WILL be sheeped in the next 3 rounds, and not killed. Because the sniper KNOWS we will sheep her because of the clue. Even if all logic goes against it, it's so obvious that the mob psycology of this game would take only one of the sniper's allies to whisper something to another gaian, and a voting chain reaction will be put into effect. It's not Peles. Not a snowball's chance in hell.
...once again, assuming the clue is legit
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 7:02 pm
Roger Silverwood DeGei Insomnesiac There's no point in sheeping Peles anyway, because like everyone said the clue is too obvious and we don't know if it really is the real clue to begin with. So no sheeping Peles until way later in the game if the CK hasn't been caught by then. Wait Wait Wait, if this is a true clue, then maybe it was obvious to throw us off and make us suspect it wasnt a true clue or wasnt Peles. SUSPICIOUS! I thought about that too, but it's just too incoherent. If even the glimpse of a lead shows up from a valid clue, the filly's good as dead. I guarentee you Peles WILL be sheeped in the next 3 rounds, and not killed. Because the sniper KNOWS we will sheep her because of the clue. Even if all logic goes against it, it's so obvious that the mob psycology of this game would take only one of the sniper's allies to whisper something to another gaian, and a voting chain reaction will be put into effect. It's not Peles. Not a snowball's chance in hell.
...once again, assuming the clue is legitThe ironic thing about this clue is that it reminds me of the game 4 clues, and how some of them were obvious yet not at the same time. Meh, maybe I shouldn't have been to quick to post "OMG Peles fits that clue". Either way looks like she'll end up getting sheeped in the next few rounds. =/
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 7:04 pm
Your guys' posts are too lone for BHK xp
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 7:07 pm
Insomnesiac Roger Silverwood DeGei Insomnesiac There's no point in sheeping Peles anyway, because like everyone said the clue is too obvious and we don't know if it really is the real clue to begin with. So no sheeping Peles until way later in the game if the CK hasn't been caught by then. Wait Wait Wait, if this is a true clue, then maybe it was obvious to throw us off and make us suspect it wasnt a true clue or wasnt Peles. SUSPICIOUS! I thought about that too, but it's just too incoherent. If even the glimpse of a lead shows up from a valid clue, the filly's good as dead. I guarentee you Peles WILL be sheeped in the next 3 rounds, and not killed. Because the sniper KNOWS we will sheep her because of the clue. Even if all logic goes against it, it's so obvious that the mob psycology of this game would take only one of the sniper's allies to whisper something to another gaian, and a voting chain reaction will be put into effect. It's not Peles. Not a snowball's chance in hell.
...once again, assuming the clue is legitThe ironic thing about this clue is that it reminds me of the game 4 clues, and how some of them were obvious yet not at the same time. Meh, maybe I shouldn't have been to quick to post "OMG Peles fits that clue". Either way looks like she'll end up getting sheeped in the next few rounds. =/ Of course she will ^^ It's what the sniper wants us to do.
It also looks like Duke's half-ready to crack on a name...whether or not that's the real sniper, they're probably going down too
Edit: And from what Dukes is describing the sniper is doing is very much how a male would act...
Double edit: Maybe I brought to that assumption too quickly...please disregard
Triple edit: Didn't I say I was gunna keep my long neck outta this round?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 2:06 pm
Hawaiian Mythology: Part Two: Children of the Gods: XIII. Pele Legends Lava rocks are said to mark the fate of members of Kahawali's family and of his ... Pele names are given to children born into her family, but such names ... www.sacred-texts.com/pac/hm/hm15.htm - 31k - Cached - Similar pages
Go Google.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:20 am
Child born of lava stone? Does that have anything to do with BHK's new name? (Something about sand, if I'm correct.)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 9:26 pm
Anael De Ezra Child born of lava stone? Does that have anything to do with BHK's new name? (Something about sand, if I'm correct.) He changed his name after the clue, so I doubt there's a connection... ninja
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 9:27 pm
Ohh! I'm becoming suspicious! surprised Fun Fun! mrgreen
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:33 pm
It could also be someone who was born where theres lots of lava, like Hawaii?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|